Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 5.6x earnings — a 87% discount to the sector average of 44.7x — ENR is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Energizer Holdings reveal a stark dichotomy between operational efficiency and capital structure leverage. While the company generates value with an ROIC-WACC spread of +3.2%, indicating that returns on invested capital comfortably exceed the cost of capital, this advantage is heavily amplified by extreme financial engineering rather than organic profitability drivers. The DuPont decomposition shows an ROE of 140.7% driven almost entirely by a massive equity multiplier of 26.82x, suggesting earnings are primarily leveraged through debt rather than margin expansion or asset turnover efficiency. This high leverage is corroborated by a precarious Altman Z-Score of 1.4, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk, even as the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and negative Beneish M-Score of -2.37 hint at reasonable financial health relative to earnings manipulation concerns.
Valuation metrics present Energizer as deeply discounted compared to its peers, trading at a P/E multiple of 5.6x against an industrial sector average of 45.7x. Such a divergence implies the market is pricing in significant distress risks or expects stagnation, contrasting sharply with the modest but positive revenue growth trajectory of 2.3% year-over-year and healthy gross margins near 41.8%. A DCF framework utilizing the provided ROIC-WACC spread would suggest intrinsic value far exceeds current trading levels if default risk were ignored; however, the market's severe discount likely reflects a premium placed on the company's fragile balance sheet rather than its cash flow generation capabilities.
Recent insider activity shows net buying of $112,360 over the last 90 days, which may indicate confidence in management's ability to navigate the leverage-induced risks or suggest undervaluation at current levels. The convergence of a low F-Score indicating stable fundamentals against a critically low Z-Score creates an asymmetric risk profile where downside protection relies on successful deleveraging while upside remains capped by credit constraints until capital structure normalization occurs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VGK or VEA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ENR shares regardless of Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to ENR through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Energizer Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding NV (ASML) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ENR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ENR Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ENR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ENR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Energizer Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Energizer Holdings, Inc. converts 11% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 89% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 2,775 | $17.58 | $48,784.5 |
| 2026-05-04 | 317 | $19.68 | $6,238.56 |
| 2026-04-20 | 18,791 | $20.48 | $384,839.68 |
| 2026-04-16 | 902 | $19.27 | $17,381.54 |
| 2026-04-10 | 41 | $18.48 | $757.68 |
| 2026-04-09 | 83 | $17.74 | $1,472.42 |
| 2026-04-08 | 287 | $16.70 | $4,792.9 |
| 2026-04-07 | 1 | $16.86 | $16.86 |
| 2026-03-31 | 289 | $16.88 | $4,878.32 |
| 2026-03-26 | 2,949 | $16.74 | $49,366.26 |
| 2026-03-24 | 190 | $17.08 | $3,245.2 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,473 | $16.96 | $24,982.08 |
| 2026-03-16 | 205 | $17.01 | $3,487.05 |
| 2026-03-03 | 18 | $20.50 | $369 |
| 2026-02-25 | 542 | $22.67 | $12,287.14 |
| 2026-02-20 | 3,676 | $22.36 | $82,195.36 |
| 2026-02-05 | 7,240 | $23.38 | $169,271.2 |
| 2026-02-03 | 66,969 | $22.51 | $1.5M |
| 2026-01-28 | 5,133 | $21.73 | $111,540.09 |
| 2026-01-12 | 17,031 | $21.63 | $368,380.53 |
| 2026-01-07 | 40 | $20.19 | $807.6 |
| 2026-01-05 | 14,292 | $19.93 | $284,839.56 |
| 2025-12-31 | 513 | $20.02 | $10,270.26 |
| 2025-12-22 | 45 | $19.81 | $891.45 |
| 2025-12-12 | 25 | $20.87 | $521.75 |
| 2025-12-08 | 46,040 | $18.21 | $838,388.4 |
| 2025-12-05 | 25 | $18.11 | $452.75 |
| 2025-12-02 | 66,033 | $17.36 | $1.1M |
| 2025-11-20 | 11,533 | $18.16 | $209,439.28 |
| 2025-11-13 | 23,565 | $24.38 | $574,514.7 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ENR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.