Industrials

Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR)

$1.1B
Market Cap
5.6
P/E Ratio
0.60
Beta
7.17%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 1.4 DistressBeneish M -2.37 CleanROIC−WACC +3.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 5.6x earnings — a 87% discount to the sector average of 44.7x — ENR is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Energizer Holdings reveal a stark dichotomy between operational efficiency and capital structure leverage. While the company generates value with an ROIC-WACC spread of +3.2%, indicating that returns on invested capital comfortably exceed the cost of capital, this advantage is heavily amplified by extreme financial engineering rather than organic profitability drivers. The DuPont decomposition shows an ROE of 140.7% driven almost entirely by a massive equity multiplier of 26.82x, suggesting earnings are primarily leveraged through debt rather than margin expansion or asset turnover efficiency. This high leverage is corroborated by a precarious Altman Z-Score of 1.4, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk, even as the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and negative Beneish M-Score of -2.37 hint at reasonable financial health relative to earnings manipulation concerns.

Valuation metrics present Energizer as deeply discounted compared to its peers, trading at a P/E multiple of 5.6x against an industrial sector average of 45.7x. Such a divergence implies the market is pricing in significant distress risks or expects stagnation, contrasting sharply with the modest but positive revenue growth trajectory of 2.3% year-over-year and healthy gross margins near 41.8%. A DCF framework utilizing the provided ROIC-WACC spread would suggest intrinsic value far exceeds current trading levels if default risk were ignored; however, the market's severe discount likely reflects a premium placed on the company's fragile balance sheet rather than its cash flow generation capabilities.

Recent insider activity shows net buying of $112,360 over the last 90 days, which may indicate confidence in management's ability to navigate the leverage-induced risks or suggest undervaluation at current levels. The convergence of a low F-Score indicating stable fundamentals against a critically low Z-Score creates an asymmetric risk profile where downside protection relies on successful deleveraging while upside remains capped by credit constraints until capital structure normalization occurs.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

5.6x
ENR P/E
44.7x
Sector Avg
-87%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.37
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

41.8%
Gross Margin
8.1%
Net Margin
9.2%
ROIC
6.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +3.2%— Positive spread.
+2.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+527.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
63.2M
Free Cash Flow
138%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

8.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.65x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
26.82x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
140.7%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

25.82x
Debt / Equity
2.11x
Current Ratio
2.8x
Interest Coverage
5.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.46%
FCF Yield
565.1M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$112,360
Net Buying
1
Buy Transactions
0
Sale Transactions
2026-02-02AQUA CAPITAL LTDBuy$112,360
2026-01-02HUNT KEVIN JOther4,335 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.68
Act: $0.67
-1.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.62
Act: $1.13
+81.0%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $1.16
Act: $1.05
-9.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.26
Act: $0.31
+19.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

4.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
8.11
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$30.29
52W High
$16.38
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$4.7B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ENR
0.39%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$1.2T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VGK or VEA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ENR shares regardless of Energizer Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to ENR through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Energizer Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ENR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ENREpicenterVXUSETFVEAETFVEUETFASMLLow RiskSMSNUnknownTSMLow Risk2330UnknownA000660Unknown
ENR Price Drop (%)0

If Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding NV (ASML) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ENR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ENR Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ENR

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ENR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Energizer Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$63M
EBITDA
$565M
FCF Conversion
11%
Reinvestment Rate
89%
11% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.2%
ROIC − WACC Spread
3.2%

Energizer Holdings, Inc. converts 11% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 89% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-122,775$17.58$48,784.5
2026-05-04317$19.68$6,238.56
2026-04-2018,791$20.48$384,839.68
2026-04-16902$19.27$17,381.54
2026-04-1041$18.48$757.68
2026-04-0983$17.74$1,472.42
2026-04-08287$16.70$4,792.9
2026-04-071$16.86$16.86
2026-03-31289$16.88$4,878.32
2026-03-262,949$16.74$49,366.26
2026-03-24190$17.08$3,245.2
2026-03-171,473$16.96$24,982.08
2026-03-16205$17.01$3,487.05
2026-03-0318$20.50$369
2026-02-25542$22.67$12,287.14
2026-02-203,676$22.36$82,195.36
2026-02-057,240$23.38$169,271.2
2026-02-0366,969$22.51$1.5M
2026-01-285,133$21.73$111,540.09
2026-01-1217,031$21.63$368,380.53
2026-01-0740$20.19$807.6
2026-01-0514,292$19.93$284,839.56
2025-12-31513$20.02$10,270.26
2025-12-2245$19.81$891.45
2025-12-1225$20.87$521.75
2025-12-0846,040$18.21$838,388.4
2025-12-0525$18.11$452.75
2025-12-0266,033$17.36$1.1M
2025-11-2011,533$18.16$209,439.28
2025-11-1323,565$24.38$574,514.7

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ENR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.