IEX (IEX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 4.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust fundamental quality, characterized by a high-quality earnings profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.51, signaling strong financial health and low manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 12.0% ROE is primarily driven by superior profitability rather than operational efficiency or leverage; specifically, a net margin of 14.0% acts as the primary engine, supported by moderate asset turnover of 0.50x and an equity multiplier of only 1.72x. While gross margins stand at a healthy 44.5%, revenue growth remains modest at 5.8% year-over-year, suggesting that current returns are more a function of pricing power than top-line expansion.
Valuation metrics indicate the market is pricing in significant future performance relative to historical norms and sector peers, as evidenced by a forward P/E multiple of 29.1x which appears elevated given the moderate growth trajectory. The disparity between this premium valuation and the DCF-derived fair value of $116 suggests that current prices may embed optimistic assumptions regarding future cash flow generation or sustained margin expansion beyond recent trends. Investors must weigh whether the high quality indicated by the financial scores justifies a multiple nearly three times typical low-growth utility profiles, assuming no significant acceleration in revenue velocity occurs to support such a premium.
With insider activity showing neutral flows over the past 90 days and no specific risk factor deltas or Fama-French alpha data provided, the investment case rests entirely on the tension between the company's exceptional balance sheet strength and its modest growth rate relative to its valuation. The combination of high margins and low leverage creates a defensive moat, yet the lack of insider buying alongside a P/E that exceeds implied DCF valuations necessitates scrutiny regarding whether current pricing accounts for potential stagnation in revenue expansion.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $143 | $103 | $79 |
| 3% | $169 | $116 | $86 |
| 4% | $208 | $133 | $95 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $116 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MOAT or VBR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IEX shares regardless of IEX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to IEX through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in IEX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If IEX (IEX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IEX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 29 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
IEX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest IEX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 29 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
IEX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does IEX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
IEX converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 226 | $213.85 | $48,330.1 |
| 2026-03-25 | 7 | $192.88 | $1,350.16 |
| 2026-03-04 | 892 | $208.96 | $186,392.32 |
| 2026-02-24 | 44 | $206.65 | $9,092.6 |
| 2026-02-20 | 4,122 | $207.86 | $856,798.92 |
| 2026-02-06 | 106 | $212.94 | $22,571.64 |
| 2026-02-05 | 24,661 | $212.25 | $5.2M |
| 2026-02-04 | 626 | $201.61 | $126,207.86 |
| 2026-01-30 | 92 | $199.72 | $18,374.24 |
| 2026-01-29 | 97 | $196.40 | $19,050.8 |
| 2026-01-21 | 35,398 | $193.30 | $6.8M |
| 2026-01-02 | 1,576 | $177.94 | $280,433.44 |
| 2025-12-30 | 1,494 | $180.01 | $268,934.94 |
| 2025-12-12 | 133 | $181.24 | $24,104.92 |
| 2025-10-31 | 2,764 | $170.30 | $470,709.2 |
| 2025-10-20 | 29 | $166.31 | $4,822.99 |
| 2025-10-15 | 58 | $163.65 | $9,491.7 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare IEX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.