KEX (KEX)

$7.2B
Market Cap
21.3
P/E Ratio
0.86
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 3.3 SafeBeneish M -2.74 CleanROIC−WACC -1.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 3.3 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for KEX presents a distinct tension between strong balance sheet fundamentals and suboptimal returns on invested capital. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 signals robust financial health with minimal earnings manipulation risk per Beneish metrics, the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -1.7% indicates that current operations are destroying value relative to the cost of equity at 9.5%. This valuation gap is driven by low revenue growth of only 3.0%, which constrains the turnover component of DuPont analysis despite healthy net and gross margins; effectively, profitability per dollar of assets remains insufficient to cover capital costs without leverage assistance or operational scaling.

Valuation metrics suggest a potential disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from discounted cash flow assumptions. Trading at 21.3x earnings, the stock commands a premium that appears inconsistent with its modest growth trajectory when weighed against a DCF fair value of $226 per share. This disparity implies the market is currently pricing in significantly higher future expansion rates than the recent 3% revenue trend supports, creating an environment where any miss on top-line execution could precipitate a sharp re-rating toward fundamental reality rather than organic growth narratives.

The risk profile remains bifurcated: while the Altman Z-Score of 3.3 suggests a comfortable buffer against bankruptcy and low earnings restatement probability, the persistent negative spread between return generation and capital cost highlights an operational inefficiency that limits downside protection during rate hikes or sector headwinds. Investors must weigh the safety provided by high-quality accounting metrics against the economic drag imposed by inadequate asset turnover and revenue velocity in a competitive landscape where capital is increasingly priced for growth rather than stability.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.5%9.5%11.5%
2%$284$199$150
3%$342$226$165
4%$434$264$185

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $226 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
3.3
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.74
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

26.3%
Gross Margin
10.5%
Net Margin
7.7%
ROIC
9.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.7%— Negative spread.
+3.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+23.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
405.7M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.78x
Debt / Equity
1.53x
Current Ratio
11.2x
Interest Coverage
1.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.03%
FCF Yield
781.9M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.28
Act: $1.33
+4.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.65
Act: $1.67
+1.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.62
Act: $1.65
+1.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.63
Act: $1.68
+3.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.14
Price/Book
760279
Avg Volume
$137.96
52W High
$79.52
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$488M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding KEX
0.13%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$382B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XTN or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KEX shares regardless of KEX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $488M of passive capital is structurally linked to KEX through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on KEX's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in KEX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

KEX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
KEXEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBRETFXPOLow RiskRXOMed RiskSAIALow RiskFLEXMed RiskKNXMed Risk
KEX Price Drop (%)0

If KEX (KEX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies XPO INC (XPO) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with KEX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

KEX Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
KEX

Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

KEX Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does KEX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$406M
EBITDA
$782M
FCF Conversion
52%
Reinvestment Rate
48%
52% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.7%

KEX converts 52% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-1521,689$142.63$3.1M
2026-04-1348$140.38$6,738.24
2026-03-199,733$125.89$1.2M
2026-03-1379,232$124.21$9.8M
2026-03-121,777$126.32$224,470.64
2026-03-045,347$133.83$715,589.01
2026-03-0222,485$129.80$2.9M
2026-02-271,293$129.66$167,650.38
2026-02-193$127.80$383.4
2025-12-2213,388$110.94$1.5M
2025-12-122$112.09$224.18
2025-12-0924$112.08$2,689.92
2025-12-05431$111.63$48,112.53
2025-11-1915$107.49$1,612.35
2025-11-033,943$103.48$408,021.64

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare KEX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.