POST (POST)

$5.0B
Market Cap
17.6
P/E Ratio
0.34
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 1.4 DistressBeneish M -2.47 CleanROIC−WACC -0.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 1.4 falls in the academic distress zone.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of POST reveal a capital allocation challenge, as the return on invested capital sits at 5.2%, falling short of the estimated cost of equity to generate value with an ROIC-WACC spread of -0.8%. This negative spread suggests that current operations are not creating intrinsic wealth relative to their financing costs. The DuPont decomposition highlights a margin-driven profitability model, where net margins of 4.1% and gross margins of 28.7% support the returns, yet these thin spreads limit upside potential even if turnover remains stable. Financial health indicators present a mixed signal; while the Beneish M-Score of -2.47 indicates low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 1.4 flags moderate distress territory, and the Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 reflects weak financial strength or deteriorating fundamentals compared to industry peers.

Valuation metrics suggest a market price that may be disconnected from intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow models. With a current P/E ratio of 17.6x, the stock trades at a premium relative to its implied growth rate and historical averages if those benchmarks are lower than this multiple, although specific sector comparisons were not provided in the data set. The DCF fair value calculation implies a target price of $375; comparing this figure directly against the current market capitalization would determine whether the security is trading at a discount or premium to its calculated intrinsic worth. Investors must weigh whether the 17.6x multiple adequately compensates for the negative ROIC spread and the moderate distress signals inherent in the Altman score, particularly given the modest revenue growth of only 3% year-over-year which constrains future cash flow expansion assumptions used in such valuations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%6%8%
2%$270$270$148
3%$375$375$187
4%$586$586$246

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $375 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
1.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.47
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

28.7%
Gross Margin
4.1%
Net Margin
5.2%
ROIC
6.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -0.8%— Negative spread.
+3.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-8.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
488.1M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

2.59x
Debt / Equity
1.67x
Current Ratio
2.2x
Interest Coverage
5.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.99%
FCF Yield
1.3B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.21
Act: $1.41
+16.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.65
Act: $2.03
+22.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.88
Act: $2.09
+11.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.67
Act: $2.13
+27.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

11.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.33
Price/Book
827569
Avg Volume
$119.85
52W High
$94.13
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$109M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding POST
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$140B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VDC or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell POST shares regardless of POST's individual fundamentals. We estimate $109M of passive capital is structurally linked to POST through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on POST's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in POST to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

POST Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
POSTEpicenterVBKETFSPDWETFMDYETFWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskPGLow RiskKOLow RiskPEPLow Risk
POST Price Drop (%)0

If POST (POST) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with POST. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

POST Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
POST

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

POST Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does POST convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$488M
EBITDA
$1.3B
FCF Conversion
37%
Reinvestment Rate
63%
37% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
5.2%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-0.8%

POST converts 37% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 63% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-149,982$104.31$1.0M
2026-05-13113$102.75$11,610.75
2026-05-072,929$103.74$303,854.46
2026-05-051,222$103.84$126,892.48
2026-05-04362$103.40$37,430.8
2026-05-0130$104.75$3,142.5
2026-04-30365$102.05$37,248.25
2026-04-2912$103.11$1,237.32
2026-04-28462$103.81$47,960.22
2026-04-244$104.64$418.56
2026-04-2321$104.23$2,188.83
2026-04-2013,080$101.59$1.3M
2026-04-143,900$99.86$389,454
2026-04-133,900$101.02$393,978
2026-04-097,299$101.54$741,140.46
2026-04-06830$100.32$83,265.6
2026-04-0225,847$97.23$2.5M
2026-04-0138,939$98.86$3.8M
2026-03-3117,755$97.20$1.7M
2026-03-269,035$97.21$878,292.35
2026-03-242,803$97.35$272,872.05
2026-03-231$96.72$96.72
2026-03-201,374$97.41$133,841.34
2026-03-177,450$97.68$727,716
2026-03-136,429$97.75$628,434.75
2026-03-1216,801$101.63$1.7M
2026-03-117,815$104.06$813,228.9
2026-03-10152$105.43$16,025.36
2026-03-0928$105.55$2,955.4
2026-03-034,899$106.65$522,478.35

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare POST to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.