PRMB (PRMB)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.0.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of PRMB present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and inefficient capital deployment. While the company demonstrates robust revenue growth of 29.3% YoY, supported by healthy gross margins at 30.3%, this momentum is undermined by razor-thin net margins of just 0.9%. This compression suggests that operating leverage or cost structures are failing to translate top-line gains into bottom-line profitability. Consequently, the return on invested capital stands at a meager 4.0%, which falls significantly below the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 6.4%, resulting in a negative spread of -2.4%. This indicates that the business is currently destroying shareholder value through its current operational model. Despite these efficiency concerns, financial stability metrics offer some nuance; the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 signals moderate fundamental strength, and the Beneish M-Score of -2.76 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, though an Altman Z-Score of 1.0 raises potential solvency flags that warrant close monitoring against historical norms.
Valuation metrics reflect extreme market optimism regarding future growth prospects rather than current cash-flow generation capabilities. The stock trades at a premium P/E ratio of 86.5x, which implies the market is pricing in sustained high-growth trajectories and margin expansion that have not yet materialized in earnings per share. This valuation stands in sharp contrast to the intrinsic value derived from discounted cash flow analysis, which places fair value at $38. The disparity between the current trading multiple and the DCF-implied price suggests a significant gap between market sentiment and fundamentals based on projected free cash flows. Investors must weigh whether the anticipated revenue acceleration can eventually drive margin improvement sufficient to justify such a high multiple, or if the negative ROIC-WACC spread will persist, leading to a re-rating that could narrow this valuation gap substantially.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.4% | 8.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $32 | $28 | $14 |
| 3% | $46 | $38 | $18 |
| 4% | $73 | $58 | $25 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $38 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VDC or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PRMB shares regardless of PRMB's individual fundamentals. We estimate $154M of passive capital is structurally linked to PRMB through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PRMB's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PRMB to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PRMB (PRMB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PRMB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PRMB Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest PRMB Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PRMB Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PRMB convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PRMB converts 23% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 77% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 187 | $22.24 | $4,158.88 |
| 2026-05-04 | 381 | $20.03 | $7,631.43 |
| 2026-04-30 | 8,359 | $19.30 | $161,328.7 |
| 2026-04-27 | 2,077 | $20.40 | $42,370.8 |
| 2026-04-23 | 646 | $20.08 | $12,971.68 |
| 2026-04-20 | 21,927 | $20.89 | $458,055.03 |
| 2026-04-17 | 69 | $20.33 | $1,402.77 |
| 2026-04-10 | 213 | $20.15 | $4,291.95 |
| 2026-04-08 | 3,494 | $18.34 | $64,079.96 |
| 2026-04-02 | 522 | $18.87 | $9,850.14 |
| 2026-04-01 | 799 | $18.83 | $15,045.17 |
| 2026-03-31 | 905 | $18.46 | $16,706.3 |
| 2026-03-30 | 330 | $18.25 | $6,022.5 |
| 2026-03-26 | 176,054 | $18.42 | $3.2M |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,760 | $21.87 | $38,491.2 |
| 2026-03-05 | 1,792 | $22.65 | $40,588.8 |
| 2026-02-27 | 9,371 | $22.65 | $212,253.15 |
| 2026-02-26 | 9,371 | $19.63 | $183,952.73 |
| 2026-02-23 | 5,010 | $18.73 | $93,837.3 |
| 2026-02-09 | 6,057 | $19.63 | $118,898.91 |
| 2026-02-06 | 37,028 | $19.23 | $712,048.44 |
| 2026-02-02 | 22,580 | $18.94 | $427,665.2 |
| 2026-01-26 | 19 | $19.26 | $365.94 |
| 2026-01-23 | 22 | $19.05 | $419.1 |
| 2026-01-20 | 5,200 | $18.81 | $97,812 |
| 2026-01-15 | 659 | $18.32 | $12,072.88 |
| 2026-01-13 | 1,123 | $18.14 | $20,371.22 |
| 2026-01-12 | 41 | $17.99 | $737.59 |
| 2025-12-31 | 419 | $16.43 | $6,884.17 |
| 2025-12-29 | 875 | $16.61 | $14,533.75 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare PRMB to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.