SLF (SLF)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company's capital allocation efficiency presents a notable divergence between return on invested capital and shareholder returns, with an ROIC of 1.1% suggesting limited value creation relative to the cost of equity despite a robust DuPont-decomposed ROE of 14.7%. This high leverage-driven profitability is evidenced by an Equity Multiplier of 15.63x, which amplifies net margins and asset turnover rather than operational efficiency, while the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates moderate fundamental strength with room for deterioration in financial health metrics.
Valuation analysis reveals a significant gap between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates, as the stock trades at approximately half its DCF-derived fair value of $38, implying that the market is currently discounting future growth expectations or assigning a lower terminal multiple than the model suggests. This discrepancy exists even though revenue growth remains healthy at 11.5% YoY, creating an environment where downside protection may be substantial if earnings power stabilizes without relying on excessive leverage.
Insider activity provides a contrasting signal to the fundamental metrics, with $55 million in net buying over the last ninety days suggesting management confidence that could offset concerns regarding low ROIC and high financial leverage. While the Fama-French risk profile is not explicitly detailed here, the combination of deep valuation discounts and significant insider accumulation creates an asymmetric setup where potential upside from mean reversion competes with risks inherent to a highly leveraged balance sheet structure.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $48 | $34 | $25 |
| 3% | $57 | $38 | $28 |
| 4% | $71 | $44 | $31 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $38 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VYMI or CWI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SLF shares regardless of SLF's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to SLF through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SLF to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SLF (SLF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with SLF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SLF Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SLF Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SLF Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SLF convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SLF converts 50% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 50% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 85,999 | $70.06 | $6.0M |
| 2026-05-08 | 10,540 | $69.51 | $732,635.4 |
| 2026-05-06 | 4,830 | $73.21 | $353,604.3 |
| 2026-05-05 | 4,035 | $72.14 | $291,084.9 |
| 2026-05-04 | 9,847 | $72.32 | $712,135.04 |
| 2026-05-01 | 13,816 | $72.08 | $995,857.28 |
| 2026-04-30 | 13,276 | $70.51 | $936,090.76 |
| 2026-04-29 | 395 | $71.19 | $28,120.05 |
| 2026-04-28 | 55 | $70.70 | $3,888.5 |
| 2026-04-27 | 1,321 | $71.53 | $94,491.13 |
| 2026-04-24 | 4,126 | $70.74 | $291,873.24 |
| 2026-04-22 | 29 | $70.32 | $2,039.28 |
| 2026-04-21 | 700 | $70.41 | $49,287 |
| 2026-04-17 | 502 | $68.61 | $34,442.22 |
| 2026-04-16 | 2,965 | $68.32 | $202,568.8 |
| 2026-04-14 | 351 | $66.28 | $23,264.28 |
| 2026-04-10 | 37 | $66.03 | $2,443.11 |
| 2026-04-09 | 39 | $65.94 | $2,571.66 |
| 2026-04-08 | 450 | $63.89 | $28,750.5 |
| 2026-04-06 | 10,616 | $63.62 | $675,389.92 |
| 2026-04-02 | 2,237 | $62.95 | $140,819.15 |
| 2026-03-31 | 3,053 | $61.92 | $189,041.76 |
| 2026-03-30 | 5,157 | $61.37 | $316,485.09 |
| 2026-03-27 | 947 | $62.53 | $59,215.91 |
| 2026-03-26 | 1,409 | $62.77 | $88,442.93 |
| 2026-03-25 | 12,731 | $63.01 | $802,180.31 |
| 2026-03-24 | 245 | $63.15 | $15,471.75 |
| 2026-03-23 | 197 | $62.07 | $12,227.79 |
| 2026-03-19 | 550 | $63.35 | $34,842.5 |
| 2026-03-18 | 1,386 | $63.97 | $88,662.42 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SLF to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.