WDS (WDS)

$44.8B
Market Cap
16.6
P/E Ratio
-0.25
Beta
4.75%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Beneish M -2.98 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital efficiency profile reveals a significant divergence between return on invested capital and equity returns, with an ROIC of 5.3% that appears insufficient to justify the leverage-driven expansion of shareholder yield seen in the DuPont decomposition. The 6.8% return on equity is mechanically sustained by an equity multiplier of 1.67x rather than organic operational momentum, as evidenced by a declining revenue trajectory of -1.5% year-over-year despite robust profitability metrics including a net margin of 20.9% and gross margin of 34.9%. This structural reliance on leverage to offset stagnating top-line growth is corroborated by the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, which signals moderate financial distress or deteriorating fundamentals when compared against historical stability benchmarks typically associated with high-quality compounders.

Valuation metrics present a complex picture where the current price-to-earnings multiple of 16.6x sits at a premium relative to earnings quality given the negative revenue trend and sub-par ROIC spread. While the elevated net margins suggest strong pricing power or cost discipline, the market appears to be pricing in future operational turnaround potential that has not yet materialized, as indicated by the shrinking asset turnover ratio of 0.20x. The combination of a declining top line with static profitability implies that current valuations may be detached from underlying cash flow generation capabilities unless significant margin expansion or volume recovery occurs soon.

The Beneish M-Score of -2.98 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, suggesting the reported financials are likely authentic despite the concerning growth dynamics. However, the interaction between a solid F-score and weak revenue trends creates an ambiguous risk-reward profile where downside protection from fundamental transparency exists alongside limited upside catalysts absent clear inflection points in sales velocity or asset utilization efficiency.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-2.98
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

34.9%
Gross Margin
20.9%
Net Margin
5.3%
ROIC
-1.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-23.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-782.0M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

20.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.20x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.67x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
6.8%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.67x
Debt / Equity
1.59x
Current Ratio
15.8x
Interest Coverage
0.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
9.4B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.25
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$25.19
52W High
$12.48
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.3B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding WDS
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$1.1T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VPL or VYMI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WDS shares regardless of WDS's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to WDS through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in WDS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

WDS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
WDSEpicenterVXUSETFVEAETFVEUETF005930Unknown000660UnknownSMSNUnknownTSMLow RiskA000660Unknown
WDS Price Drop (%)0

If WDS (WDS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (005930) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with WDS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

WDS Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
WDS

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

WDS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does WDS convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-782,000,000
EBITDA
$9.4B
FCF Conversion
-8%
Reinvestment Rate
108%
-8% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

WDS converts -8% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 108% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1437$22.45$830.65
2026-05-1111,451$21.57$246,998.07
2026-05-088,440$21.91$184,920.4
2026-05-074,682$22.42$104,970.44
2026-05-0516,972$23.46$398,163.12
2026-05-04150$23.53$3,529.5
2026-05-018,119$23.85$193,638.15
2026-04-309,719$24.00$233,256
2026-04-2910,719$23.26$249,323.94
2026-04-2812,643$23.12$292,306.16
2026-04-2712,520$23.04$288,460.8
2026-04-248,725$23.03$200,936.75
2026-04-22138$22.74$3,138.12
2026-04-173,324$23.85$79,277.4
2026-04-1625,987$23.58$612,773.46
2026-04-101,225$23.37$28,628.25
2026-04-095,532$23.63$130,721.16
2026-04-08167$24.68$4,121.56
2026-04-0714,599$24.41$356,361.59
2026-04-0632,982$24.23$799,153.86
2026-04-0236,045$23.68$853,545.6
2026-04-0110,826$23.88$258,524.88
2026-03-3112,547$24.27$304,515.69
2026-03-3020,448$24.78$506,701.44
2026-03-2713,622$23.82$324,476.04
2026-03-261,294$23.66$30,616.04
2026-03-257,870$24.34$191,555.8
2026-03-2415,034$23.74$356,907.16
2026-03-239,407$24.14$227,084.98
2026-03-2081,829$24.47$2.0M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare WDS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.