BRK.A (BRK.A)
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price level of $723,821 for BRK.A presents a unique analytical challenge due to the extreme valuation scale inherent in Class A shares, which often obscures standard technical patterns typically visible in more liquid or lower-priced equities. Without specific data regarding Short-Term Moving Average crossovers, volume anomalies, or immediate price action relative to key support and resistance zones, it is impossible to deduce precise institutional positioning from the provided figures alone. In large-cap conglomerates of this magnitude, significant capital flows often occur through private block trades or over-the-counter transactions that do not immediately reflect in public intraday volume metrics, making standard technical indicators less reliable for gauging real-time sentiment compared to smaller market participants. Consequently, any attempt to infer whether larger players are aggressively accumulating or distributing based solely on the single price point is speculative and lacks necessary context regarding recent trend direction or volatility compression. Institutional behavior in such assets frequently diverges from retail-driven technical signals, as major entities may hold positions for extended periods without generating the high-frequency trading patterns that standard moving average strategies rely upon to identify shifts in control. A comprehensive assessment of institutional intent would require a broader dataset encompassing historical price ranges, comparative volume profiles against prior periods, and specific indicators like Relative Strength Index or Average True Range to establish meaningful baselines for deviation analysis. Until additional technical parameters are supplied, the available information remains insufficient to construct a narrative about market maker activity or directional bias driven by large
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Smart Money Flow
Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares Change | % Change | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | -2 | -100.0% | Exited |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | -17 | -34.0% | Decreased |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | -4 | -100.0% | Exited |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | +2 | +100.0% | New Position |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q4 | +19 | +61.3% | Increased |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2025-Q4 | +4 | +100.0% | New Position |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MGV or VTV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BRK.A shares regardless of BRK.A's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to BRK.A through 4 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BRK.A to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BRK.A (BRK.A) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with BRK.A. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BRK.A Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 157 BRK.A shares, reducing daily market volatility.
BRK.A (BRK.A) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.1% of the MGV (MGV) and 0.5% of the Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VTV). Across 4 tracked ETFs, approximately 0M shares (0.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest BRK.A Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BRK.A Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for BRK.A over the past year sits near $727828.75 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $707210.00 sits 2.8% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)
Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares | Value ($K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | 33 | $23,698,620K |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q4 | 50 | $37,740,000K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2025-Q4 | 4 | $3,019,200K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | 2 | $1,509,600K |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q3 | 31 | $23,380,200K |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| BRK-B | 0.961 | 0.976 | High co-movement |
| BRK.B | 0.960 | 0.976 | High co-movement |
| MMC | 0.519 | 0.442 | Moderate |
| AFL | 0.506 | 0.453 | Moderate |
| HIG | 0.476 | 0.458 | Moderate |
| L | 0.468 | 0.388 | Moderate |
| TRV | 0.458 | 0.459 | Moderate |
| VRTPX | 0.443 | 0.322 | Moderate |
| MRSH | 0.442 | 0.427 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare BRK.A to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.