Utilities / Utilities - Regulated Electric

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG)

$81.35
+1.19%
$18.9B
Market Cap
21.8
P/E Ratio
0.54
Beta
3.39%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.9 DistressBeneish M -2.77 CleanROIC−WACC -2.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

EVRG trades at 21.8x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 24.4x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Evergy, Inc. present a distinct capital efficiency challenge characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.8%, indicating that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital. Despite this negative spread, the DuPont decomposition reveals an 8.3% ROE driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier at 3.31x) and robust net margins of 14.3%, rather than operational asset turnover which remains low at 0.18x. This capital structure is corroborated by a weak Altman Z-Score of 0.9, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk, while the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests moderate financial strength and the Beneish M-Score of -2.77 points to low earnings manipulation risk; however, these scores must be weighed against the persistent negative return on invested capital that undermines long-term shareholder value creation.

Valuation metrics suggest a market premium over historical norms despite sector-relative affordability. The current P/E ratio of 22.6x trades below the sector average of 24.2x, yet it remains significantly elevated relative to the company's weak profitability factor (RMW) of -0.158 and sluggish revenue growth of just 1.9% year-over-year. This disconnect implies that current pricing may be anticipating a future reversion in capital efficiency or an improvement in asset turnover that has not yet materialized in the financial statements, creating a potential divergence between market expectations and realized operational performance.

Risk-adjusted return profiles further complicate the investment thesis through conflicting factor signals. While the stock exhibits a strong Fama-French alpha of 14.40% annually driven by its value tilt (HML: 0.479), this momentum is counterbalanced by deteriorating profitability metrics and recent insider activity showing $736,482 in net selling over the last ninety days. The convergence of a low Altman Z-Score with weak profit generation factors suggests that while the stock may offer attractive entry points for value-oriented strategies based on its HML factor, the underlying capital destruction and insider distribution patterns warrant caution regarding future downside protection.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

21.8x
EVRG P/E
24.4x
Sector Avg
19.5x
5Y Avg P/E
-11%
vs Sector

Currently trading 17% above its 5-year average P/E of 19.5x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price action for Evergy, Inc. at $82.97 within the utilities sector presents a neutral-to-bullish structure that often attracts institutional scrutiny during periods of market stability. While specific moving average crossover data is not provided in this snapshot, the sustained presence near an 80-dollar level suggests potential support where larger capital allocators might establish defensive positions given the sector's typical low beta characteristics. Institutional players frequently monitor such utility stocks for yield and stability rather than aggressive growth, meaning volume trends here would likely reflect steady accumulation or passive holding patterns rather than speculative surges. In the absence of explicit volume spikes or sharp price deviations in this summary, larger market participants appear to be maintaining a measured stance, perhaps waiting for clearer macroeconomic signals before committing significant new capital. The lack of extreme volatility often seen in growth sectors implies that any institutional positioning is likely focused on long-term income generation rather than short-term momentum plays. Consequently, the technical setup does not exhibit immediate signs of aggressive entry or exit strategies by major funds; instead, it reflects a landscape where institutions are likely evaluating risk-adjusted returns consistent with broader defensive portfolio allocations. Ultimately, this configuration allows for diverse interpretations depending on an institution's specific mandate regarding interest rate sensitivity and dividend reliability. The data indicates that while there is no overt signal forcing immediate large-scale directional shifts by major players, the market structure remains conducive to those seeking stability over rapid appreciation. Observers should note that without further confirmation through volume expansion or

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.9
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.77
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

52.3%
Gross Margin
14.3%
Net Margin
3.9%
ROIC
6.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.8%— Negative spread.
+1.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-2.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-751.7M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

14.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.18x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.31x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
8.3%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.31x
Debt / Equity
0.49x
Current Ratio
2.4x
Interest Coverage
4.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.33%
FCF Yield
2.7B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-736,482
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
3
Sale Transactions
2026-03-12KING CHARLES LYNNSold 2/8 qtrsSale$200,533
2026-03-10HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVESold 2/8 qtrsSale$301,527
2026-02-27HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVESold 2/8 qtrsGrant10,586 shares
2026-02-27CAISLEY CHARLES ASold 1/8 qtrsGrant10,766 shares
2026-02-27BRIDSON JOHN TGrant4,252 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.67
Act: $0.54
-19.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.77
Act: $0.82
+5.9%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $2.06
Act: $2.03
-1.4%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.55
Act: $0.42
-24.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.6950
Latest Dividend
$2.70
2025 Total
+3.9%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.76
2016
$1.60
2017
$1.73
2018
$1.93
2019
$2.05
2020
$2.18
2021
$2.33
2022
$2.48
2023
$2.60
2024
$2.70
2025
$1.39
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-22$0.69500.0%
2026-03-10$0.69500.0%
2025-11-21$0.6950+4.0%
2025-08-22$0.66800.0%
2025-05-23$0.66800.0%
2025-03-10$0.66800.0%
2024-11-21$0.6680+3.9%
2024-08-20$0.64300.0%
2024-05-17$0.64300.0%
2024-03-08$0.64300.0%
2023-11-21$0.6430+4.9%
2023-08-18$0.61300.0%
Stock Splits
1987-05-22: 2:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

16.8%
Annual Volatility
1.47
Sharpe (1Y)
-8.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.25
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.259
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
+0.479
Value (HML)
Value tilt
-0.158
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.048
Invest (CMA)
Neutral
Alpha (annual): +14.40%
R²: 10.4%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

18.0
Forward P/E
2.30
PEG Ratio
1.86
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$85.27
52W High
$64.70
52W Low
81%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.5B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding EVRG
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.4T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLU or SPLV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell EVRG shares regardless of Evergy, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to EVRG through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Evergy, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

EVRG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
EVRGEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFNEEHigh RiskNEEHigh RiskSOHigh RiskDUKHigh RiskSOHigh Risk
EVRG Price Drop (%)0

If Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NEXTERA ENERGY INC (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with EVRG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

EVRG Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 EVRG shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
EVRG
Total Shares
231M
ETF Lock-Up
18.1%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
18.1%Locked Float

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.4% of the State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and 1.3% of the SPLV (SPLV). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 42M shares (18.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

EVRG Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
EVRG
PRICE
$81.35
FLOOR (POC)
$75.80
STRENGTH
High
$64$65$66$677%$68$69$709%$716%$728%$74$75$76POC 12%$776%$78$79$80$818%$81.35$829%$84$85
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Evergy, Inc. over the past year sits near $75.80 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $81.35 trades 7.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

EVRG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Evergy, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-751,700,000
EBITDA
$2.7B
FCF Conversion
-28%
Reinvestment Rate
128%
-28% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
3.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.8%

Evergy, Inc. converts -28% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 128% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14264$82.46$21,769.44
2026-05-0110$82.84$828.4
2026-04-276$81.23$487.38
2026-04-24499$81.89$40,863.11
2026-04-231,113$79.64$88,639.32
2026-04-2214,892$80.35$1.2M
2026-04-2044,994$82.37$3.7M
2026-04-17179,687$82.00$14.7M
2026-04-1616,151$81.54$1.3M
2026-04-153$81.92$245.76
2026-04-1412,141$82.45$1.0M
2026-04-1328,730$83.58$2.4M
2026-04-101$84.41$84.41
2026-04-09644$83.44$53,735.36
2026-04-0746,638$82.65$3.9M
2026-03-2712$80.40$964.8
2026-03-2622,740$79.98$1.8M
2026-03-2522$79.93$1,758.46
2026-03-2373$78.70$5,745.1
2026-03-191$81.54$81.54
2026-03-162,986$82.63$246,733.18
2026-02-25100,000$82.50$8.3M
2026-02-191$80.40$80.4
2026-02-1762$82.69$5,126.78
2026-02-12351$79.31$27,837.81
2026-02-1040$77.15$3,086
2026-02-04310$77.80$24,118
2026-02-0227$76.73$2,071.71
2026-01-2157,587$76.13$4.4M
2026-01-2010$76.44$764.4

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
PNW0.7740.776High co-movement
AEE0.7700.754High co-movement
LNT0.7650.821High co-movement
DTE0.7570.764High co-movement
DUK0.7480.755High co-movement
CMS0.7450.773High co-movement
WEC0.7310.737High co-movement
EXC0.7200.728High co-movement
PPL0.7080.726High co-movement

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare EVRG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.