SPLV(SPLV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe SPLV ETF demonstrates a distinct concentration within the Utilities sector, which accounts for 13.3% of its total portfolio value based on current data. This heavy weighting is primarily driven by an exceptional overlap in top holdings, where ten individual positions are all classified under Utilities and each represents approximately 1.3% to 1.4% of assets under management. Notably, the single largest holding, CNP, sits at 1.4%, creating a scenario where nearly one-fifth of the fund's exposure is derived from just this utility giant combined with its nine peers listed in the top ten. This structural characteristic suggests that the ETF's performance will be highly correlated with the broader utilities index rather than offering diversification across other market sectors, as no non-utility names appear among the leading positions provided.
Geographically and quantitatively, while specific regional breakdowns are not detailed in the supplied data, the composition of these top ten holdings implies a significant tilt toward large-cap, established utility companies that often operate with substantial domestic footprints or regulated monopolies within their respective service territories. The uniformity of weightings around 1.3% indicates an equal-weighted approach to this specific cluster of utilities, preventing any single entity other than CNP from dominating the top tier beyond a narrow margin. With assets under management totaling $7.3 billion, the fund possesses sufficient scale to maintain liquidity for these large-cap constituents while adhering strictly to its sector mandate. Investors analyzing this vehicle should recognize that its risk profile is intrinsically tied to utility-specific factors such as interest rate sensitivity and regulatory changes, given that almost all of its most prominent assets fall within this single defensive yet cyclical industry segment.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 03:57:06.21399+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100The investment theme implied by the ticker SPLV is Small-Mid Cap Utilities, and this objective appears to be strongly supported by the provided data. The top ten holdings are exclusively concentrated within the utilities sector, with no unrelated industries present in the list. Furthermore, every single holding listed represents a mid-to-small capitalization utility company rather than a broad market mega-cap giant, which indicates that the fund maintains its thematic focus without relying on large-cap names to artificially stabilize returns or mask a lack of strategy.
The concentration risk profile is consistent with the stated small-mid cap theme, as evidenced by the fact that these specific ten companies account for only 13.3% of the total portfolio weight despite their individual weights ranging between 1.29% and 1.40%. This suggests a broad diversification strategy across many names rather than an over-reliance on a few dominant players, which aligns with the typical structure of small-cap funds seeking to avoid single-stock volatility. The sector breakdown shows a complete dedication to utilities for these top positions, demonstrating high coherence between the fund's composition and its implied investment mandate without deviation into other sectors or asset classes.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 22:20:13.65714+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of SPLV demonstrates a distinct and concentrated focus on the Utilities industry, which accounts for 13.3% of the portfolio through exactly ten holdings. This uniform distribution across the top utilities suggests an investment thesis centered entirely on this specific defensive segment rather than seeking diversification into broader market sectors like technology or healthcare. The complete absence of exposure to other industries indicates that the fund is designed as a pure-play vehicle for investors specifically targeting utility equities, thereby exposing the entire portfolio's performance trajectory solely to the idiosyncratic risks and macroeconomic drivers affecting this single sector.
Concentration risk appears elevated given that the top ten holdings represent 13.3% of total assets, with all five largest positions being utilities comprising roughly half a percentage point each. While individual stock weights are modest at approximately 1.4%, the lack of any non-utility exposure means there is no buffer against sector-wide downturns or regulatory shifts that specifically impact regulated utility companies. This structure implies a factor tilt toward value and low volatility characteristics historically associated with utilities, as well as a sensitivity to interest rate environments that disproportionately affect capital-intensive infrastructure firms. The homogeneity of the top holdings further reinforces that the fund's returns will be highly correlated with the performance of large-cap electric power and water operators, limiting potential diversification benefits while amplifying sector-specific beta.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 07:26:06.774044+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share SPLV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 53% of SPLV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPRSP | $83B | — | 10 | 13.3% |
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 10 | 13.3% |
| IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF | $762B | 0.03% | 10 | 13.3% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 10 | 13.3% |
| SCHVSCHV | $15B | — | 10 | 13.3% |
13% of SPLV's portfolio by weight is also held by RSP, which commands 11× more assets under management. When RSP receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging SPLV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 67% ofSPLV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 13% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietarySPLV is down 0.5% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +7.2%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 7.7% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 13% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of SPLV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of SPLV's analyzed weight, 0% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 100% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 13% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
HIGHHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
SPLV has a Passive Crowding Score of 61/100. On average, 18.4% of the market capitalization of SPLV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. In the event of a broad sell-off, SPLV faces elevated "gap-down" risk — as passive redemptions force simultaneous selling of constituents where a large portion of the float is not actively trading.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 31 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CNP | CenterPoint Energy Inc Utilities | 1.35% | 25.9x | 5/9 |
| 2 | WEC | WEC Energy Group Inc Utilities | 1.35% | 22.3x | 5/9 |
| 3 | PNW | Pinnacle West Capital Corp Utilities | 1.35% | 18.6x | 4/9 |
| 4 | SO | Southern Co Utilities | 1.34% | 23.5x | 4/9 |
| 5 | ATO | Atmos Energy Corp Utilities | 1.34% | 20.8x | 6/9 |
| 6 | AEE | Ameren Corp Utilities | 1.34% | 19.4x | 6/9 |
| 7 | DTE | DTE Energy Co Utilities | 1.33% | 23.5x | 5/9 |
| 8 | EVRG | Evergy Inc Utilities | 1.31% | 21.8x | 4/9 |
| 9 | LNT | Alliant Energy Corp Utilities | 1.31% | 22.5x | 6/9 |
| 10 | DUK | Duke Energy Corp Utilities | 1.29% | 18.9x | 7/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how SPLV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
10 holdings · 13.3% tracked weight2026-05-23
10 holdings · 13.3% tracked weight2026-05-22
10 holdings · 13.3% tracked weight2026-05-21
10 holdings · 13.3% tracked weight2026-05-20
10 holdings · 13.3% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove SPLV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How SPLV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.