Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicPWR trades at 98.0x earnings — a 119% premium to its sector average of 44.7x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 5.1. DCF fair value of $242 implies 59% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of PWR reveal a distinct tension between high-growth momentum and deteriorating capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition indicates that returns on equity are driven primarily by significant leverage rather than operational excellence, with an equity multiplier of 2.76x offsetting modest net margins of 3.6%, the cost of capital is eroding value generation. An ROIC-WACC spread of -3.2% signals that current investments fail to cover financing costs, a dynamic often associated with high-beta growth strategies but concerning for long-term compounding. Despite this negative spread, qualitative risk indicators remain robust; the company maintains a strong Altman Z-Score of 5.0 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.43 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk, supported by a solid Piotroski F-Score of 5/9. However, the Profitability Factor alpha of -0.101 highlights that recent performance has underperformed relative to peers based on profitability metrics despite impressive revenue growth of 20.3% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. The current P/E ratio of 82.7x sits at an extreme premium, implying the market is aggressively pricing in sustained hyper-growth that may not align with fundamental earnings power. This disconnect is quantified by a DCF fair value calculation showing -56.0% downside potential relative to current prices, driven by assumptions regarding future free cash flow growth. Although the model assumes a 10-year implied FCF growth rate of 25.8%, which would be necessary to justify existing multiples, the negative Value Factor alpha of -0.368 suggests the stock is currently overvalued relative to its size and book value characteristics typical of small-cap equities. The market appears to be pricing in a scenario where operational leverage eventually converts into margin expansion that has not yet materialized.
Risk-adjusted return profiles indicate significant exposure to growth factor risks rather than value premiums. The Fama-French alpha of 29.43% annually reflects substantial outperformance against the benchmark, but this is counterbalanced by negative tilts in both size/value and profitability factors, suggesting the returns are concentrated in high-risk, low-margin segments. With insider flow remaining neutral over the last 90 days, there is no clear signal of management conviction or distress at the current price levels. The combination of a deeply negative ROIC spread and valuation multiples that exceed historical norms creates an environment where future performance hinges entirely on whether operating leverage can improve margins without further increasing financial risk through additional leverage.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 20% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.2% | 11.2% | 13.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $293 | $218 | $170 |
| 3% | $337 | $242 | $184 |
| 4% | $397 | $272 | $202 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $706.06.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $242 (-59.4%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 74% above its 5-year average P/E of 49.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-02 | $0.1100 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | $0.1100 | +10.0% |
| 2025-10-01 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-01 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-04-03 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-01-02 | $0.1000 | +11.1% |
| 2024-10-01 | $0.0900 | 0.0% |
| 2024-07-01 | $0.0900 | 0.0% |
| 2024-04-08 | $0.0900 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-29 | $0.0900 | +12.5% |
| 2023-09-29 | $0.0800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-30 | $0.0800 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IWP or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PWR shares regardless of Quanta Services, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $15.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to PWR through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Quanta Services, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PWR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PWR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 PWR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.8% of the IWP (IWP) and 2.6% of the VOT (VOT). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 22M shares (14.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest PWR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PWR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Quanta Services, Inc. over the past year sits near $438.81 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $706.06 trades 60.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
PWR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Quanta Services, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Quanta Services, Inc. converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | 7,436 | $637.28 | $4.7M |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,280 | $633.44 | $810,803.2 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,601 | $601.88 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-16 | 213 | $591.82 | $126,057.66 |
| 2026-04-06 | 635 | $560.63 | $356,000.05 |
| 2026-03-26 | 3,448 | $573.50 | $2.0M |
| 2026-03-25 | 14 | $578.44 | $8,098.16 |
| 2026-03-24 | 853 | $567.45 | $484,034.85 |
| 2026-03-16 | 261 | $559.02 | $145,904.22 |
| 2026-03-13 | 4,593 | $566.91 | $2.6M |
| 2026-03-11 | 217 | $564.05 | $122,398.85 |
| 2026-03-05 | 54,497 | $568.38 | $31.0M |
| 2026-02-27 | 261 | $565.05 | $147,478.05 |
| 2026-02-26 | 8,256 | $562.77 | $4.6M |
| 2026-02-25 | 413 | $568.21 | $234,670.73 |
| 2026-02-18 | 53 | $525.13 | $27,831.89 |
| 2026-02-12 | 133 | $523.96 | $69,686.68 |
| 2026-02-04 | 27 | $488.60 | $13,192.2 |
| 2026-02-03 | 3,929 | $477.77 | $1.9M |
| 2026-01-20 | 998 | $466.75 | $465,816.5 |
| 2026-01-15 | 136 | $437.07 | $59,441.52 |
| 2026-01-08 | 5 | $436.89 | $2,184.45 |
| 2026-01-07 | 7 | $438.22 | $3,067.54 |
| 2026-01-02 | 176 | $422.06 | $74,282.56 |
| 2025-12-30 | 31 | $431.03 | $13,361.93 |
| 2025-12-23 | 516 | $433.03 | $223,443.48 |
| 2025-12-22 | 3,705 | $426.66 | $1.6M |
| 2025-12-17 | 29 | $438.49 | $12,716.21 |
| 2025-12-05 | 4,412 | $464.84 | $2.1M |
| 2025-12-03 | 61 | $454.72 | $27,737.92 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| FIX | 0.752 | 0.810 | High co-movement |
| VRT | 0.700 | 0.685 | High co-movement |
| EME | 0.662 | 0.656 | Moderate |
| ETN | 0.655 | 0.657 | Moderate |
| CW | 0.611 | 0.720 | Moderate |
| GEV | 0.597 | 0.640 | Moderate |
| FN | 0.597 | 0.659 | Moderate |
| HWM | 0.583 | 0.573 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.581 | 0.622 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare PWR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.