Industrials

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

$706.06
+2.70%
$106.8B
Market Cap
98.0
P/E Ratio
1.24
Beta
0.06%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 5.1 SafeBeneish M -2.43 CleanROIC−WACC -3.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

PWR trades at 98.0x earnings — a 119% premium to its sector average of 44.7x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 5.1. DCF fair value of $242 implies 59% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of PWR reveal a distinct tension between high-growth momentum and deteriorating capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition indicates that returns on equity are driven primarily by significant leverage rather than operational excellence, with an equity multiplier of 2.76x offsetting modest net margins of 3.6%, the cost of capital is eroding value generation. An ROIC-WACC spread of -3.2% signals that current investments fail to cover financing costs, a dynamic often associated with high-beta growth strategies but concerning for long-term compounding. Despite this negative spread, qualitative risk indicators remain robust; the company maintains a strong Altman Z-Score of 5.0 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.43 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk, supported by a solid Piotroski F-Score of 5/9. However, the Profitability Factor alpha of -0.101 highlights that recent performance has underperformed relative to peers based on profitability metrics despite impressive revenue growth of 20.3% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. The current P/E ratio of 82.7x sits at an extreme premium, implying the market is aggressively pricing in sustained hyper-growth that may not align with fundamental earnings power. This disconnect is quantified by a DCF fair value calculation showing -56.0% downside potential relative to current prices, driven by assumptions regarding future free cash flow growth. Although the model assumes a 10-year implied FCF growth rate of 25.8%, which would be necessary to justify existing multiples, the negative Value Factor alpha of -0.368 suggests the stock is currently overvalued relative to its size and book value characteristics typical of small-cap equities. The market appears to be pricing in a scenario where operational leverage eventually converts into margin expansion that has not yet materialized.

Risk-adjusted return profiles indicate significant exposure to growth factor risks rather than value premiums. The Fama-French alpha of 29.43% annually reflects substantial outperformance against the benchmark, but this is counterbalanced by negative tilts in both size/value and profitability factors, suggesting the returns are concentrated in high-risk, low-margin segments. With insider flow remaining neutral over the last 90 days, there is no clear signal of management conviction or distress at the current price levels. The combination of a deeply negative ROIC spread and valuation multiples that exceed historical norms creates an environment where future performance hinges entirely on whether operating leverage can improve margins without further increasing financial risk through additional leverage.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$706.06
Fair Value
$243
Implied Upside
-65.6%
$243IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)21%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)11.2%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
26.9%annual FCF growth priced in at $706.06

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 20% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →9.2%11.2%13.2%
2%$293$218$170
3%$337$242$184
4%$397$272$202

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $706.06.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $242 (-59.4%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

98.0x
PWR P/E
44.7x
Sector Avg
49.5x
5Y Avg P/E
+119%
vs Sector

Currently trading 74% above its 5-year average P/E of 49.5x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
5.1
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.43
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

15.0%
Gross Margin
3.6%
Net Margin
8.1%
ROIC
11.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -3.2%— Negative spread.
+20.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+13.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.6B
Free Cash Flow
4%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

3.6%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
1.14x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.76x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
11.4%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.76x
Debt / Equity
1.14x
Current Ratio
6.3x
Interest Coverage
1.9x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.75%
FCF Yield
2.6B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.66
Act: $1.78
+6.9%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.45
Act: $2.48
+1.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $3.26
Act: $3.33
+2.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $3.02
Act: $3.16
+4.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.1100
Latest Dividend
$0.40
2025 Total
+48.1%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.04
2018
$0.17
2019
$0.21
2020
$0.18
2021
$0.36
2022
$0.33
2023
$0.27
2024
$0.40
2025
$0.22
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-04-02$0.11000.0%
2026-01-02$0.1100+10.0%
2025-10-01$0.10000.0%
2025-07-01$0.10000.0%
2025-04-03$0.10000.0%
2025-01-02$0.1000+11.1%
2024-10-01$0.09000.0%
2024-07-01$0.09000.0%
2024-04-08$0.09000.0%
2023-12-29$0.0900+12.5%
2023-09-29$0.08000.0%
2023-06-30$0.08000.0%
Stock Splits
2000-04-10: 1.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

34.6%
Annual Volatility
2.40
Sharpe (1Y)
1.31
Sharpe (3Y)
-33.9%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-33.9%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.20
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.173
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
-0.368
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
-0.101
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.238
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +29.43%
R²: 35.1%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

43.3
Forward P/E
2.00
PEG Ratio
11.81
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$788.75
52W High
$337.48
52W Low
82%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$15.0B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PWR
0.23%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.5T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like IWP or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PWR shares regardless of Quanta Services, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $15.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to PWR through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Quanta Services, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PWR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PWREpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFCATLow RiskGELow RiskCATLow RiskVRTLow RiskGEVLow Risk
PWR Price Drop (%)0

If Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PWR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PWR Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 PWR shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
PWR
Total Shares
150M
ETF Lock-Up
14.6%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
14.6%Locked Float

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.8% of the IWP (IWP) and 2.6% of the VOT (VOT). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 22M shares (14.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PWR Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
PWR
PRICE
$706.06
FLOOR (POC)
$438.81
STRENGTH
High
$349$37114%$39412%$41611%$439POC 15%$4619%$484$507$529$5526%$5747%$597$619$642$665$687$710$706.06$732$755$777
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Quanta Services, Inc. over the past year sits near $438.81 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $706.06 trades 60.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

PWR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Quanta Services, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.6B
EBITDA
$2.6B
FCF Conversion
63%
Reinvestment Rate
37%
63% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-3.1%

Quanta Services, Inc. converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-287,436$637.28$4.7M
2026-04-241,280$633.44$810,803.2
2026-04-202,601$601.88$1.6M
2026-04-16213$591.82$126,057.66
2026-04-06635$560.63$356,000.05
2026-03-263,448$573.50$2.0M
2026-03-2514$578.44$8,098.16
2026-03-24853$567.45$484,034.85
2026-03-16261$559.02$145,904.22
2026-03-134,593$566.91$2.6M
2026-03-11217$564.05$122,398.85
2026-03-0554,497$568.38$31.0M
2026-02-27261$565.05$147,478.05
2026-02-268,256$562.77$4.6M
2026-02-25413$568.21$234,670.73
2026-02-1853$525.13$27,831.89
2026-02-12133$523.96$69,686.68
2026-02-0427$488.60$13,192.2
2026-02-033,929$477.77$1.9M
2026-01-20998$466.75$465,816.5
2026-01-15136$437.07$59,441.52
2026-01-085$436.89$2,184.45
2026-01-077$438.22$3,067.54
2026-01-02176$422.06$74,282.56
2025-12-3031$431.03$13,361.93
2025-12-23516$433.03$223,443.48
2025-12-223,705$426.66$1.6M
2025-12-1729$438.49$12,716.21
2025-12-054,412$464.84$2.1M
2025-12-0361$454.72$27,737.92

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
FIX0.7520.810High co-movement
VRT0.7000.685High co-movement
EME0.6620.656Moderate
ETN0.6550.657Moderate
CW0.6110.720Moderate
GEV0.5970.640Moderate
FN0.5970.659Moderate
HWM0.5830.573Moderate
TSM0.5810.622Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare PWR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.