RXRX (RXRX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.2. Beneish M-Score of -1.49 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of RXRX present a stark contradiction between aggressive top-line expansion and severe capital destruction. Despite posting 27% year-over-year revenue growth, the company is generating negative returns on invested capital at -38.3%, creating a widening spread against its weighted average cost of capital (WACC) that has deteriorated to -49.3%. This value erosion is mathematically driven by an unsustainable net margin contraction to -868.3%, which overwhelms the modest 0.05x asset turnover and low equity multiplier, resulting in a DuPont ROE of -57.0%. While the Beneish M-Score of -1.49 suggests management earnings are not aggressively manipulated, the Altman Z-Score of 0.2 signals extreme proximity to insolvency, compounded by a Piotroski F-Score of only 4/9 that indicates significant deterioration in financial health relative to peers.
Valuation metrics reflect this precarious balance between growth expectations and profitability concerns. The market appears pricing in substantial future margin normalization or asset restructuring rather than current earnings power, given the negative net income environment. Although specific historical P/E comparisons are unavailable due to losses, the Fama-French factor loadings reveal a distinct divergence from traditional value characteristics; the stock exhibits a strong growth tilt with an HML factor of -0.832 while suffering heavily on the profitability dimension (RMW: -2.980). This positioning suggests investors are betting exclusively on revenue velocity and potential market share gains, accepting current capital inefficiencies as a temporary cost of business model transformation rather than addressing immediate solvency risks.
Risk assessment highlights significant downside volatility driven by both fundamental fragility and insider sentiment. The net selling pressure from insiders amounting to $3.4 million over the last 90 days aligns with the deteriorating F-Score, suggesting internal stakeholders are reducing exposure despite the revenue uptick. Furthermore, the weak profitability factor loading indicates that relative to other stocks in its implied sector, RXRX is underperforming on earnings power metrics significantly more than it deviates from value benchmarks. The combination of an Altman Z-score near distress territory and substantial insider outflows creates a high-risk profile where any failure to quickly normalize margins could trigger severe re-rating pressure, while the current Fama-French alpha of 8.06% appears anomalous given the underlying capital destruction metrics.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKG or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RXRX shares regardless of RXRX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $178M of passive capital is structurally linked to RXRX through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RXRX's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in RXRX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If RXRX (RXRX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG (CRSP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with RXRX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RXRX Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 RXRX shares, reducing daily market volatility.
RXRX (RXRX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.1% of the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) and 1.0% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 5 tracked ETFs, approximately 60M shares (11.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest RXRX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RXRX Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for RXRX over the past year sits near $4.86 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $3.61 sits 25.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 233,607 | $3.15 | $735,862.05 |
| 2026-05-12 | 45,174 | $3.26 | $147,267.24 |
| 2026-05-08 | 15,459 | $3.27 | $50,550.93 |
| 2026-05-07 | 83,578 | $3.43 | $286,672.54 |
| 2026-05-06 | 1,798 | $3.37 | $6,059.26 |
| 2026-05-05 | 14,228 | $3.52 | $50,082.56 |
| 2026-05-04 | 21,454 | $3.39 | $72,729.06 |
| 2026-05-01 | 6,623 | $3.46 | $22,915.58 |
| 2026-04-28 | 20,043 | $3.48 | $69,749.64 |
| 2026-04-27 | 572,992 | $3.51 | $2.0M |
| 2026-04-24 | 58,107 | $3.50 | $203,374.5 |
| 2026-04-23 | 123,115 | $3.73 | $459,218.95 |
| 2026-04-22 | 958,206 | $3.56 | $3.4M |
| 2026-04-21 | 573,061 | $3.69 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-20 | 103,430 | $3.78 | $390,965.4 |
| 2026-04-17 | 182,900 | $3.60 | $658,440 |
| 2026-04-16 | 487,437 | $3.75 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-15 | 124,999 | $3.54 | $442,496.46 |
| 2026-04-14 | 935,680 | $3.42 | $3.2M |
| 2026-04-13 | 1,165,602 | $3.28 | $3.8M |
| 2026-04-10 | 892,472 | $3.31 | $3.0M |
| 2026-04-09 | 475,471 | $3.39 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-08 | 150,864 | $3.19 | $481,256.16 |
| 2026-04-07 | 153,031 | $3.15 | $482,047.65 |
| 2026-04-06 | 230,448 | $3.11 | $716,693.28 |
| 2026-04-02 | 218,940 | $3.06 | $669,956.4 |
| 2026-04-01 | 108,797 | $3.07 | $334,006.79 |
| 2026-03-31 | 62,430 | $2.84 | $177,301.2 |
| 2026-03-30 | 362,134 | $2.94 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-27 | 30,555 | $3.15 | $96,248.25 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ABSI | 0.634 | 0.636 | Moderate |
| CRSP | 0.614 | 0.539 | Moderate |
| SDGR | 0.598 | 0.597 | Moderate |
| BEAM | 0.549 | 0.547 | Moderate |
| TWST | 0.537 | 0.569 | Moderate |
| PRME | 0.536 | 0.620 | Moderate |
| NTLA | 0.471 | 0.415 | Moderate |
| TEM | 0.467 | 0.541 | Moderate |
| PACB | 0.452 | 0.570 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare RXRX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.