VOO vs VTI – ETF Overlap Analysis
Weighted holdings overlap using institutional min-weight methodology. Each shared stock contributes the lesser of its weight in either fund.
Holding both VOO and VTI provides virtually zero diversification benefit — 86.8% weighted holdings overlap.
VOO and VTI both utilize passive investment strategies to track broad U.S. equity indices, yet they differ significantly in sector exposure and concentration. While the two funds share an 86.8% overlap in holdings, their top five positions reveal distinct weighting patterns; VOO exhibits higher concentration in technology giants like NVIDIA and Apple compared to VTI. This divergence suggests that VOO offers more aggressive exposure to large-cap tech leaders relative to its benchmark, whereas VTI maintains a broader distribution across the entire U.S. market spectrum, including mid-caps and small-caps absent from the specific data provided for VOO but inherent in its total market mandate. Regarding efficiency metrics, both funds operate with identical expense ratios of 0.03%, indicating comparable cost structures for investors regardless of their chosen vehicle. However, VTI commands a larger asset base at over $2 trillion compared to VOO's approximately $1.5 trillion, which may influence liquidity profiles and tracking precision during periods of market volatility. Although specific performance figures are not available in the provided data, the substantial difference in total assets managed suggests that VTI might offer slightly different scale advantages or fee structures for institutional participants seeking a comprehensive U.S. equity allocation without the slight tilt toward mega-cap technology seen in VOO's top holdings.
AI-Synthesized Redundancy Verdict. Generated locally by Qwen-14B based on real-time constituent weight differentials and sector tilts.
Redundancy Matrix
Interactive overlap analysis. Shared holdings weighted by the institutional min-weight formula — each stock's contribution equals its lesser weight across both funds.
Top Shared Holdings
Overlap weight = min(allocation in VOO, allocation in VTI)
The Difference Makers
VOO Only — Overweight vs Peer
VTI Only — Overweight vs Peer
Sector Tilt
Look-Through Fundamentals
VOO Concentration
VTI Concentration
Top Sector Divergences
Largest allocation gaps between the two funds, by sector weight.
VOO has a +4.0% Technology tilt over VTI.
Sector Exposure Comparison
Risk & Return Metrics
| Metric | VOO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $1509.9B | $2095.3B |
| Holdings | 500 | 3,700 |
| TTM Yield | 0.86% | 0.83% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.17% |
| Annual Volatility | 16.8% | 17.4% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 1.49 | 1.44 |
| Sharpe (3Y) | 1.01 | 0.96 |
| Max Drawdown (3Y) | -18.7% | -19.3% |
VOO Price
VTI Price
Related Comparisons
Look-through metrics derived from constituent-level analysis. Overlap calculated using institutional min-weight methodology. Not investment advice.