ETF Overlap Analysis

VTI vs QQQ – ETF Overlap Analysis

VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares
vs
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
43.1% Overlap

Weighted holdings overlap using institutional min-weight methodology. Each shared stock contributes the lesser of its weight in either fund.

VerdictData-Driven

VTI and QQQ share a 43.1% overlap — moderate redundancy. Consider whether both are needed.

The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF and the Invesco QQQ Trust employ distinct investment philosophies, with VTI aiming to replicate the entire U.S. equity market while QQQ focuses exclusively on non-financial companies within the Nasdaq-100 index. Although both funds share a significant 43.1% overlap in holdings, their top five constituents reveal different weighting strategies; for instance, NVIDIA carries a heavier concentration in QQQ at 9.0% compared to its 6.6% weight in VTI, while Tesla appears exclusively among the largest positions of the Nasdaq-focused fund. This structural difference means that VTI provides broader diversification across all market capitalizations, whereas QQQ offers heightened exposure to large-cap growth stocks and technology sectors. Regarding operational metrics, VTI maintains a substantially lower expense ratio at 0.03% compared to QQQ's 0.20%, resulting in reduced annual costs for the former relative to its total assets under management of $2.1 trillion versus QQQ's $411.8 billion. While specific tracking error figures are not provided, the disparity in expense ratios suggests that VTI may offer a more cost-efficient vehicle for capturing broad market returns over long horizons. Investors holding larger positions might find the lower fee structure of VTI advantageous, while those seeking concentrated exposure to high-growth technology leaders through QQQ would accept higher costs as part of their specific sector tilt strategy.

AI-Synthesized Redundancy Verdict. Generated locally by Qwen-14B based on real-time constituent weight differentials and sector tilts.

Redundancy Matrix

Interactive overlap analysis. Shared holdings weighted by the institutional min-weight formula — each stock's contribution equals its lesser weight across both funds.

VTIQQQ43.1%OVERLAP
Moderate Overlap

Top Shared Holdings

VTI alloc.QQQ alloc.Overlap
NVDA6.63%9.03%6.6%
AAPL5.74%8.01%5.7%
MSFT4.36%7.17%4.4%
AMZN3.69%4.92%3.7%
GOOGL3.23%3.63%3.2%
AVGO2.85%3.26%2.9%
GOOG2.54%3.38%2.5%
META1.93%3.86%1.9%

Overlap weight = min(allocation in VTI, allocation in QQQ)

The Difference Makers

VTI Only — Overweight vs Peer

BRK.B
Financial Services1.22% weight
LLY
Healthcare1.14% weight
JPM
Financial Services1.14% weight
XOM
Energy0.93% weight

QQQ Only — Overweight vs Peer

PLTR
Technology2.23% weight
NFLX
Communication Services2.19% weight
CSCO
Technology1.68% weight
TMUS
Communication Services1.25% weight

Sector Tilt

Technology
-18.0%QQQ
Financial Services
+9.7%VTI
Communication Services
-7.3%QQQ
Industrials
+4.8%VTI
Consumer Cyclical
-3.8%QQQ

Look-Through Fundamentals

Harmonic P/E
VTI
27.4x
QQQ
32.3x
Weighted P/B
VTI
15.66x
QQQ
16.89x
HHI Concentration
VTI
147
QQQ
338
Total Holdings
VTI
3,700
QQQ
100
Top 5 Weight
VTI
22.3%
QQQ
33.1%
Dividend Yield
VTI
1.17%
QQQ
0.49%
Expense Ratio
VTI
0.03%
QQQ
0.20%
Annual Volatility
VTI
17.4%
QQQ
22.4%

VTI Concentration

01000200030004000147
Well Diversified

QQQ Concentration

01000200030004000338
Well Diversified

Top Sector Divergences

Largest allocation gaps between the two funds, by sector weight.

Technology:QQQ +18.0%
Financial Services:VTI +9.7%
Communication Services:QQQ +7.3%
Industrials:VTI +4.8%
Consumer Cyclical:QQQ +3.8%

QQQ has a +18.0% Technology tilt over VTI.

Sector Exposure Comparison

Technology
31.1%
49.1%
Communication Services
9.8%
17.1%
Consumer Cyclical
8.6%
12.4%
Financial Services
10.0%
0.3%
Industrials
7.7%
2.9%
Healthcare
7.5%
4.6%
Consumer Defensive
4.2%
4.3%
Energy
3.2%
0.5%
Utilities
2.1%
1.4%
Basic Materials
1.6%
0.0%
Real Estate
1.6%
0.2%
VTI QQQ

Risk & Return Metrics

MetricVTIQQQ
Expense Ratio0.03%0.20%
AUM$2095.3B$411.8B
Holdings3,700100
TTM Yield0.83%0.29%
Dividend Yield1.17%0.49%
Annual Volatility17.4%22.4%
Sharpe (1Y)1.441.45
Sharpe (3Y)0.961.02
Max Drawdown (3Y)-19.3%-22.8%

VTI Top Holdings

1NVDANVIDIA Corp.6.63%
2AAPLApple Inc.5.74%
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp.4.36%
4AMZNAmazon.com Inc.3.69%
5GOOGLAlphabet Inc. Class A3.23%
6AVGOBroadcom Inc.2.85%
7GOOGAlphabet Inc. Class C2.54%
8METAFacebook Inc. Class A1.93%
9TSLATesla Inc.1.55%
10BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B1.22%

QQQ Top Holdings

1NVDANVIDIA Corp.9.03%
2AAPLApple Inc.8.01%
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp.7.17%
4AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.4.92%
5TSLATesla, Inc.3.97%
6METAMeta Platforms, Inc.3.86%
7GOOGLAlphabet Inc.3.63%
8GOOGAlphabet Inc.3.38%
9AVGOBroadcom Inc.3.26%
10PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.2.23%

VTI Price

Loading chart...

QQQ Price

Loading chart...

Related Comparisons

Look-through metrics derived from constituent-level analysis. Overlap calculated using institutional min-weight methodology. Not investment advice.