VTI vs QQQ – ETF Overlap Analysis
Weighted holdings overlap using institutional min-weight methodology. Each shared stock contributes the lesser of its weight in either fund.
VTI and QQQ share a 43.1% overlap — moderate redundancy. Consider whether both are needed.
The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF and the Invesco QQQ Trust employ distinct investment philosophies, with VTI aiming to replicate the entire U.S. equity market while QQQ focuses exclusively on non-financial companies within the Nasdaq-100 index. Although both funds share a significant 43.1% overlap in holdings, their top five constituents reveal different weighting strategies; for instance, NVIDIA carries a heavier concentration in QQQ at 9.0% compared to its 6.6% weight in VTI, while Tesla appears exclusively among the largest positions of the Nasdaq-focused fund. This structural difference means that VTI provides broader diversification across all market capitalizations, whereas QQQ offers heightened exposure to large-cap growth stocks and technology sectors. Regarding operational metrics, VTI maintains a substantially lower expense ratio at 0.03% compared to QQQ's 0.20%, resulting in reduced annual costs for the former relative to its total assets under management of $2.1 trillion versus QQQ's $411.8 billion. While specific tracking error figures are not provided, the disparity in expense ratios suggests that VTI may offer a more cost-efficient vehicle for capturing broad market returns over long horizons. Investors holding larger positions might find the lower fee structure of VTI advantageous, while those seeking concentrated exposure to high-growth technology leaders through QQQ would accept higher costs as part of their specific sector tilt strategy.
AI-Synthesized Redundancy Verdict. Generated locally by Qwen-14B based on real-time constituent weight differentials and sector tilts.
Redundancy Matrix
Interactive overlap analysis. Shared holdings weighted by the institutional min-weight formula — each stock's contribution equals its lesser weight across both funds.
Top Shared Holdings
Overlap weight = min(allocation in VTI, allocation in QQQ)
The Difference Makers
VTI Only — Overweight vs Peer
QQQ Only — Overweight vs Peer
Sector Tilt
Look-Through Fundamentals
VTI Concentration
QQQ Concentration
Top Sector Divergences
Largest allocation gaps between the two funds, by sector weight.
QQQ has a +18.0% Technology tilt over VTI.
Sector Exposure Comparison
Risk & Return Metrics
| Metric | VTI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% |
| AUM | $2095.3B | $411.8B |
| Holdings | 3,700 | 100 |
| TTM Yield | 0.83% | 0.29% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 0.49% |
| Annual Volatility | 17.4% | 22.4% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 1.44 | 1.45 |
| Sharpe (3Y) | 0.96 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (3Y) | -19.3% | -22.8% |
VTI Price
QQQ Price
Related Comparisons
Look-through metrics derived from constituent-level analysis. Overlap calculated using institutional min-weight methodology. Not investment advice.