QQQ vs ARKK – ETF Overlap Analysis
Weighted holdings overlap using institutional min-weight methodology. Each shared stock contributes the lesser of its weight in either fund.
Only 14.1% overlap — these funds complement each other well for diversification.
The iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF and the ARK Innovation ETF pursue distinctly different investment philosophies, resulting in divergent sector exposures despite a modest 14.1% overlap in holdings. QQQ maintains a broad focus on established technology giants, with its top five positions heavily weighted toward industry leaders like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Tesla. In contrast, ARKK employs an active thematic strategy targeting disruptive innovation across biotechnology, fintech, and robotics, evidenced by significant allocations to companies such as CRISPR Therapeutics and Intellia Therapeutics alongside semiconductor firms. While both funds include Tesla within their largest constituents, the underlying compositions reflect QQQ's concentration in mature market caps versus ARKK's exposure to high-growth, often smaller-cap innovators. These structural differences are mirrored in their cost structures and scale metrics. QQQ operates with a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.20%, supported by substantial assets under management totaling $411.8 billion, which typically facilitates tighter tracking error relative to its benchmark. Conversely, ARKK carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and manages approximately $6.7 billion in assets, reflecting the higher operational costs associated with active portfolio construction rather than passive index replication. The disparity in fund size also suggests varying levels of liquidity and investor base maturity; QQQ's massive scale implies deep market penetration for its top holdings, whereas ARKK's smaller footprint may result in different volatility characteristics driven by its concentrated thematic bets.
AI-Synthesized Redundancy Verdict. Generated locally by Qwen-14B based on real-time constituent weight differentials and sector tilts.
Redundancy Matrix
Interactive overlap analysis. Shared holdings weighted by the institutional min-weight formula — each stock's contribution equals its lesser weight across both funds.
Top Shared Holdings
Overlap weight = min(allocation in QQQ, allocation in ARKK)
The Difference Makers
QQQ Only — Overweight vs Peer
ARKK Only — Overweight vs Peer
Sector Tilt
Look-Through Fundamentals
QQQ Concentration
ARKK Concentration
Top Sector Divergences
Largest allocation gaps between the two funds, by sector weight.
QQQ has a +25.8% Technology tilt over ARKK.
Sector Exposure Comparison
Risk & Return Metrics
| Metric | QQQ | ARKK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $411.8B | $6.7B |
| Holdings | 100 | 35 |
| TTM Yield | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| Annual Volatility | 22.4% | 46.6% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 1.45 | 1.18 |
| Sharpe (3Y) | 1.02 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (3Y) | -22.8% | -39.6% |
QQQ Top Holdings
| 1 | NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 9.03% |
| 2 | AAPLApple Inc. | 8.01% |
| 3 | MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 7.17% |
| 4 | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | 4.92% |
| 5 | TSLATesla, Inc. | 3.97% |
| 6 | METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 3.86% |
| 7 | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. | 3.63% |
| 8 | GOOGAlphabet Inc. | 3.38% |
| 9 | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | 3.26% |
| 10 | PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 2.23% |
ARKK Top Holdings
| 1 | TSLATESLA INC | 10.54% |
| 2 | AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 5.14% |
| 3 | CRCLCIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC | 4.85% |
| 4 | TEMTEMPUS AI INC-CL A | 4.72% |
| 5 | CRSPCRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG | 4.69% |
| 6 | HOODROBINHOOD MARKETS INC - A | 4.43% |
| 7 | COINCOINBASE GLOBAL INC -CLASS A | 4.31% |
| 8 | ROKUROKU INC | 4.29% |
| 9 | SHOPSHOPIFY INC - CLASS A | 4.13% |
| 10 | PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 3.06% |
QQQ Price
ARKK Price
Related Comparisons
Look-through metrics derived from constituent-level analysis. Overlap calculated using institutional min-weight methodology. Not investment advice.