CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of CRISPR Therapeutics AG currently reflect a distressed capital allocation profile, evidenced by an ROIC of -24.8% and a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, signaling severe deterioration in financial health relative to the typical nine-point scale used for assessing quality. Through a DuPont lens, negative returns on invested capital suggest that operating leverage or asset turnover is failing to generate earnings before interest and taxes, rather than indicating an issue with financial leverage alone. This weak profitability factor (RMW) of -1.783 further confirms the company's inability to convert revenue into net income efficiently, while the low F-Score implies potential issues in fundamental areas such as profit margins or asset quality compared to peers.
Valuation metrics present a complex divergence between historical norms and sector benchmarks; although the stock trades at a P/E multiple significantly below the healthcare sector average of 37.0x, this discount may reflect market skepticism regarding future cash flow generation rather than undervaluation given the negative ROIC. Any discounted cash flow analysis would likely yield a depressed fair value due to the implied growth assumptions required to overcome current losses and the lack of profitability traction. Consequently, the low valuation appears driven by fundamental operational struggles rather than an attractive entry point relative to intrinsic worth derived from sustainable earnings power.
Risk-reward dynamics are further complicated by conflicting factor exposures; while the stock exhibits a strong positive Fama-French alpha of 17.94% annually, suggesting outperformance on a risk-adjusted basis over time, this is counterbalanced by a significant negative value factor (HML) of -0.651, indicating a heavy growth tilt that leaves it vulnerable during market rotations toward value. Compounding these macro factors, insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling totaling $12,285,734, which often precedes downward pressure or signals management's lack of confidence in near-term prospects despite the historical alpha generation.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedCRISPR Therapeutics AG is currently trading at $48.56, a price point that requires contextual analysis against its moving averages to determine the prevailing trend direction. Without specific average data provided in this snapshot, the immediate assessment relies on observing whether recent pricing action sustains above or dips below these key benchmarks. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) serves as a critical gauge for short-term momentum; if values hover near overbought territories, it may indicate potential exhaustion of upward pressure, whereas readings approaching oversold levels could signal accumulating strength despite broader market conditions. In the healthcare sector, technical setups often reflect both company-specific catalysts and wider industry sentiment. The current price level acts as a pivot point where traders evaluate whether momentum is sufficient to push higher or if resistance looms nearby. A sustained position above moving averages typically aligns with bullish structural trends, while trading below them suggests bearish pressure that might necessitate further consolidation before any significant directional shift occurs. Ultimately, the interplay between price location relative to trend lines and RSI readings offers a snapshot of market sentiment rather than a definitive forecast. Investors must weigh these technical observations against fundamental developments unique to CRISPR Therapeutics AG. The data presented highlights dynamic shifts in short-term velocity and potential trend integrity, leaving the final interpretation of whether this constitutes an entry, exit, or monitoring opportunity entirely to the discretion of the analyst reviewing the full chart context.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKG or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CRSP shares regardless of CRISPR Therapeutics AG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $556M of passive capital is structurally linked to CRSP through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CRSP's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in CRISPR Therapeutics AG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TEMPUS AI INC-CL A (TEM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CRSP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CRSP Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 8 CRSP shares, reducing daily market volatility.
CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 8.3% of the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) and 4.7% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 5 tracked ETFs, approximately 12M shares (11.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest CRSP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CRSP Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for CRISPR Therapeutics AG over the past year sits near $54.10 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $52.02 sits 3.8% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 672,023 | $52.75 | $35.4M |
| 2026-05-13 | 447 | $52.83 | $23,615.01 |
| 2026-05-12 | 11,890 | $54.01 | $642,178.9 |
| 2026-05-11 | 2,779 | $54.83 | $152,372.57 |
| 2026-04-29 | 288 | $52.06 | $14,993.28 |
| 2026-04-28 | 57 | $50.99 | $2,906.43 |
| 2026-04-27 | 65 | $48.79 | $3,171.35 |
| 2026-04-24 | 152 | $55.18 | $8,387.36 |
| 2026-04-23 | 66 | $56.42 | $3,723.72 |
| 2026-04-22 | 364 | $55.54 | $20,216.56 |
| 2026-04-21 | 189 | $57.69 | $10,903.41 |
| 2026-04-20 | 64,326 | $57.99 | $3.7M |
| 2026-04-17 | 44,550 | $55.72 | $2.5M |
| 2026-04-16 | 1,774 | $56.76 | $100,692.24 |
| 2026-04-15 | 34,700 | $56.86 | $2.0M |
| 2026-04-14 | 40,586 | $54.83 | $2.2M |
| 2026-04-13 | 16,184 | $51.22 | $828,944.48 |
| 2026-04-10 | 126 | $51.72 | $6,516.72 |
| 2026-04-08 | 5,707 | $49.70 | $283,637.9 |
| 2026-04-07 | 5,144 | $49.15 | $252,827.6 |
| 2026-04-06 | 54,989 | $49.51 | $2.7M |
| 2026-04-02 | 6,152 | $48.81 | $300,279.12 |
| 2026-04-01 | 3,928 | $47.57 | $186,854.96 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2 | $44.34 | $88.68 |
| 2026-03-26 | 11,461 | $47.09 | $539,698.49 |
| 2026-03-25 | 85 | $46.43 | $3,946.55 |
| 2026-03-24 | 19,440 | $46.88 | $911,347.2 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1,717 | $46.24 | $79,394.08 |
| 2026-03-20 | 1,679 | $46.95 | $78,829.05 |
| 2026-03-19 | 5,981 | $47.69 | $285,233.89 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| BEAM | 0.673 | 0.723 | Moderate |
| RXRX | 0.614 | 0.539 | Moderate |
| NTLA | 0.603 | 0.595 | Moderate |
| ABSI | 0.599 | 0.546 | Moderate |
| PRME | 0.586 | 0.657 | Moderate |
| SDGR | 0.511 | 0.525 | Moderate |
| TWST | 0.476 | 0.492 | Moderate |
| BFLY | 0.429 | 0.523 | Moderate |
| TEM | 0.406 | 0.501 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare CRSP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.