Stock vs Stock Comparison

Celanese Corporation vs BHP Group Limited

BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2.

CE$55.27
BHP$93.15

🏆 Tale of the Tape

26
CEBHP
-12.2%Profitability (Net Margin)17.6%
Valuation (P/E)22.1x
-2.3%Efficiency (ROIC)17.2%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
1.4Safety (Altman Z)3.8
-7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)-7.9%
0.98Risk (Sharpe 1Y)2.01
3.85xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.08x
4.67%FCF Yield4.57%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.199
252-Day Correlation
0.139
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCEBHP
Market Cap$5.8B$225.9B
P/E Ratio22.1x
Forward P/E8.0x16.7x
P/B1.43x4.48x
Dividend Yield0.23%2.99%
Beta0.810.80

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCEBHP
DCF Fair Value$59.59$19.51
DCF Upside-12.7%-75.0%
Piotroski F4/94/9
Altman Z1.363.78
Beneish M-3.04-2.88
FCF Yield4.67%4.57%
Net Debt/EBITDA37.9x0.3x
ROIC-2.3%17.2%
WACC6.3%9.2%
ROIC – WACC-8.6pp7.9pp
Gross Margin20.4%71.7%
Net Margin-12.2%17.6%
Rev Growth YoY-7.0%-7.9%
Sharpe (1Y)0.982.01
Max Drawdown 3Y-37.2%
FCF Payout Ratio2%69%

CE Price

Loading chart...

BHP Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CE found in:

IJS0.87%
SLYV0.69%
VAW0.48%
SPSM0.35%
VFVA0.33%
ONEY0.18%
VBR0.17%
VB0.10%
VXF0.09%
SPTM0.01%
ONEO0.00%

BHP found in:

VPL1.61%
VYMI1.05%
SPDW0.65%
VEA0.61%
CWI0.59%
VEU0.49%
VXUS0.17%
VT0.17%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CE vs BHP: Head-to-Head Analysis

Celanese Corporation (CE) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BHP leads 6–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CE generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -2.3% compared to BHP's 17.2%. This suggests BHP is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CE and BHP is 0.199, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

CE appears in 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while BHP appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CE or BHP?

Our quantitative analysis compares CE and BHP across nine fundamental dimensions. BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CE and BHP correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CE and BHP is 0.199. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.