Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 1/9; Altman Z of 0.2 falls in the academic distress zone.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. present a stark contrast to traditional value metrics, characterized by severe capital inefficiency and deteriorating operational performance. The company's Return on Invested Capital stands at -22.1%, indicating that deployed capital is actively destroying shareholder value rather than generating returns above the cost of equity. This distress is further illuminated by DuPont-style decomposition elements; with a net margin collapsing to -97.9% and revenue contracting 51.4% year-over-year, earnings power is eroding across both efficiency and profitability levers. Compounding this deterioration are robustly negative quality signals: the Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 suggests extreme weakness in financial health transitions, while an Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places the entity well below the threshold typically associated with bankruptcy risk, signaling precarious solvency conditions absent any provided liquidity data to offset these structural flaws.
Valuation multiples reflect a market pricing in significant uncertainty rather than current earnings power. While the sector average P/E ratio sits at 37.5x, Arcturus lacks traditional multiple comparability due to its negative earnings profile; consequently, any existing valuation must be interpreted through a lens of implied growth expectations or asset backing rather than cash flow generation. The disconnect between fundamental reality and market pricing is further highlighted by the Fama-French alpha data, which records an annualized alpha of 10.37%. This substantial positive alpha suggests that recent price movements have significantly outpaced risk-adjusted return benchmarks, potentially indicating a speculative premium detached from the underlying deteriorating fundamentals or reflecting specific event-driven catalysts not captured in standard factor models.
Risk-reward dynamics are heavily skewed by aggressive value factor underperformance and weak profitability signals. The Value Factor (HML) score of -0.981 confirms that the stock exhibits a pronounced growth tilt, meaning it is currently trading at valuations inconsistent with deep-value characteristics and exposing investors to higher downside volatility if mean reversion occurs. Simultaneously, the Profitability Factor (RMW) score of -1.405 underscores severe weakness in earnings quality relative to peers, suggesting that any recovery narrative faces steep headwinds without a fundamental pivot in operational execution. The combination of these factor loadings implies that current pricing may be driven by non-fundamental sentiment rather than sustainable economic moats, leaving the investment thesis highly sensitive to future clinical or commercial developments that could alter the trajectory of revenue contraction and capital destruction.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedArcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. is currently trading at $7.47, a position that requires contextualization against its moving average envelope to assess relative value dynamics. Without specific upper and lower band parameters or the precise location of the simple moving averages within this range, it remains unclear whether the current price represents an overextension above the mean or a potential oversold condition below it. The distance between the $7.47 market level and the central tendency defined by the SMAs will dictate the magnitude of any anticipated statistical pullback toward equilibrium. If the stock were trading significantly outside these bands, historical patterns often suggest increased volatility as prices gravitate back to the mean, whereas proximity to the envelope might indicate a continuation of existing trends rather than an imminent reversal. In the absence of explicit band boundaries or directional bias data, the immediate technical narrative relies on interpreting this price point relative to recent average costs incurred by market participants. A substantial deviation from the moving averages could imply that short-term sentiment has pushed the valuation away from its statistical norm, potentially setting conditions for a mean-reversion event if historical volatility regimes hold steady. Conversely, tight clustering around these averages would suggest stability with limited immediate pressure toward either extreme. The current $7.47 level serves as a pivot point where traders might evaluate whether the asset is undervalued relative to recent performance metrics or simply reflecting ongoing sector-specific pressures within the healthcare landscape. Ultimately, determining the probability of a price correction versus trend continuation depends entirely on
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ARCT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ARCT Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 11 ARCT shares, reducing daily market volatility.
ETFs with Highest ARCT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ARCT Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. over the past year sits near $7.22 (18% of 252-day volume). The current price of $7.65 trades 5.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (18% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 6,154 | $8.26 | $50,832.04 |
| 2026-05-08 | 6,093 | $8.90 | $54,227.7 |
| 2026-05-07 | 153 | $9.13 | $1,396.89 |
| 2026-05-05 | 8,991 | $8.57 | $77,052.87 |
| 2026-04-30 | 7,127 | $8.40 | $59,866.8 |
| 2026-04-29 | 517 | $8.87 | $4,585.79 |
| 2026-04-20 | 1,000 | $8.85 | $8,850 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1,902 | $8.62 | $16,395.24 |
| 2026-04-09 | 4 | $8.50 | $34 |
| 2026-04-08 | 861 | $8.51 | $7,327.11 |
| 2026-03-26 | 57 | $7.06 | $402.42 |
| 2026-03-25 | 6,346 | $6.65 | $42,200.9 |
| 2026-03-24 | 4,363 | $6.87 | $29,973.81 |
| 2026-03-19 | 8,653 | $6.55 | $56,677.15 |
| 2026-03-16 | 2,075 | $6.68 | $13,861 |
| 2026-03-13 | 1 | $7.00 | $7 |
| 2026-03-11 | 48 | $7.62 | $365.76 |
| 2026-03-09 | 807 | $7.11 | $5,737.77 |
| 2026-03-05 | 11,391 | $7.58 | $86,343.78 |
| 2026-03-04 | 273 | $7.91 | $2,159.43 |
| 2026-03-03 | 5,332 | $8.35 | $44,522.2 |
| 2026-03-02 | 1,914 | $8.23 | $15,752.22 |
| 2026-02-27 | 1,225 | $8.32 | $10,192 |
| 2026-02-26 | 2,415 | $8.30 | $20,044.5 |
| 2026-02-25 | 4,283 | $8.18 | $35,034.94 |
| 2026-02-23 | 3,663 | $7.67 | $28,095.21 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,200 | $7.97 | $9,564 |
| 2026-02-19 | 1,153 | $7.51 | $8,659.03 |
| 2026-02-17 | 2,820 | $7.21 | $20,332.2 |
| 2026-02-09 | 777 | $7.57 | $5,881.89 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| LII | 0.429 | 0.524 | Moderate |
| CMC | 0.407 | 0.351 | Moderate |
| BEAM | 0.404 | 0.434 | Moderate |
| SWK | 0.393 | 0.336 | Moderate |
| NDSN | 0.389 | 0.363 | Moderate |
| AOS | 0.376 | 0.417 | Moderate |
| RXRX | 0.375 | 0.358 | Moderate |
| CRSP | 0.375 | 0.403 | Moderate |
| TWST | 0.369 | 0.377 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare ARCT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.