Carvana Co. (CVNA)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicCVNA trades at 42.4x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 35.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 6.8. DCF fair value of $21 implies 94% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -0.43 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a stark divergence between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While revenue growth of 48.6% drives an impressive DuPont ROE decomposition via high asset turnover, the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -28.1% signals that returns on invested capital are failing to cover the cost of equity at a rate of 25.4%. This inefficiency is compounded by weak profitability metrics; despite a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 6.2 suggesting moderate financial stability, the Profitability Factor (RMW) registers -1.000, indicating significant weakness in generating profits relative to industry peers. The high equity multiplier of 3.14x suggests leverage is sustaining returns where operational margins alone cannot compensate for capital destruction.
Valuation metrics reflect extreme market pricing that appears disconnected from intrinsic value models. Trading at a current P/E of 37.2x, the stock commands a premium well above historical norms and sector averages, implying expectations of sustained hyper-growth that may not be materializing given the negative ROIC trajectory. A DCF analysis yields a fair value of $21, representing an implied downside of -93.5% from current levels, driven by assumptions that cannot reconcile the 48.6% revenue growth with the observed capital inefficiency. The market is effectively pricing in a decade-long free cash flow growth rate of 48.5%, a figure that seems inconsistent with the company's inability to generate returns above its cost of capital.
Risk-adjusted performance data reveals significant headwinds despite anomalous short-term momentum. Although the Fama-French Alpha stands at an unusually high 123.15% annually, this is counterbalanced by a Value Factor (HML) of -0.116 and a severe Profitability Factor score, suggesting the stock's outperformance stems from growth characteristics that are currently underperforming on fundamental quality metrics. Furthermore, insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling totaling $29 million, which often precedes or accompanies management concerns regarding valuation or future capital allocation challenges. The combination of negative ROIC spread, weak profitability factors, and substantial insider offloading creates a risk profile where current valuations rely entirely on future margin expansion that has not yet materialized in the income statement.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 49% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 23.3% | 25.3% | 27.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $24 | $20 | $17 |
| 3% | $25 | $21 | $17 |
| 4% | $26 | $22 | $18 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $65.60.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=25.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $21 (-94.2%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 145% above its 5-year average P/E of 16.3x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedCarvana Co. is currently trading at $66.02, a position that requires contextual analysis against its moving averages to determine the prevailing trend direction and momentum strength. Without specific values for short-term or long-term averages provided in this snapshot, it remains unclear whether the price action signifies an uptrend where the stock sits above key benchmarks or a downtrend where it lags below them. The absence of Relative Strength Index data further limits immediate insight into short-term overbought or oversold conditions, leaving the precise momentum state ambiguous based solely on these limited figures. In this technical configuration, the relationship between current price and historical averages serves as the primary indicator for trend validation. If the $66.02 level were to persist above established moving averages, it would typically suggest sustained bullish pressure, whereas a position below them might indicate weakening momentum or bearish dominance. The lack of RSI metrics prevents an assessment of whether short-term velocity is accelerating into potential exhaustion zones or gathering strength from oversold levels. Consequently, the immediate technical picture presents a neutral stance where trend confirmation relies heavily on comparing this price point to dynamic averages that are not explicitly detailed here. Ultimately, the data provided offers only the current valuation without sufficient historical context to definitively classify the market regime as bullish or bearish. Observers must look beyond the single price figure to evaluate how $66.02 aligns with prior performance trajectories and volatility patterns. Until additional indicators such as moving average crossovers
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CVNA shares regardless of Carvana Co.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $7.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to CVNA through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Carvana Co. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Carvana Co. (CVNA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CVNA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CVNA Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 23 CVNA shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Carvana Co. (CVNA) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.5% of the XRT (XRT) and 1.3% of the VOT (VOT). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 31M shares (4.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest CVNA Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CVNA Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Carvana Co. over the past year sits near $71.73 (17% of 252-day volume). The current price of $65.60 sits 8.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (17% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 60 | $69.90 | $4,194 |
| 2026-05-13 | 13,374 | $73.72 | $985,931.28 |
| 2026-05-12 | 26,952 | $76.23 | $2.1M |
| 2026-05-11 | 44,286 | $77.94 | $3.5M |
| 2026-05-08 | 1,429 | $400.02 | $571,628.58 |
| 2026-05-07 | 4,181 | $389.38 | $1.6M |
| 2026-05-05 | 210,120 | $376.55 | $79.1M |
| 2026-04-30 | 89 | $396.59 | $35,296.51 |
| 2026-04-29 | 941 | $406.42 | $382,441.22 |
| 2026-04-28 | 1,298 | $406.73 | $527,935.54 |
| 2026-04-27 | 9,548 | $409.08 | $3.9M |
| 2026-04-24 | 7,567 | $403.02 | $3.0M |
| 2026-04-23 | 640 | $416.79 | $266,745.6 |
| 2026-04-22 | 197 | $400.92 | $78,981.24 |
| 2026-04-21 | 27,483 | $401.99 | $11.0M |
| 2026-04-20 | 5,241 | $387.53 | $2.0M |
| 2026-04-16 | 213 | $371.08 | $79,040.04 |
| 2026-04-15 | 56,522 | $374.21 | $21.2M |
| 2026-04-14 | 7,959 | $359.27 | $2.9M |
| 2026-04-13 | 4,897 | $336.31 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-09 | 13,681 | $338.81 | $4.6M |
| 2026-04-08 | 2 | $320.22 | $640.44 |
| 2026-04-06 | 5,737 | $313.91 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-02 | 14,914 | $312.09 | $4.7M |
| 2026-04-01 | 496 | $314.38 | $155,932.48 |
| 2026-03-30 | 760 | $302.04 | $229,550.4 |
| 2026-03-27 | 225 | $301.37 | $67,808.25 |
| 2026-03-26 | 291 | $308.56 | $89,790.96 |
| 2026-03-25 | 561 | $300.97 | $168,844.17 |
| 2026-03-24 | 770 | $299.60 | $230,692 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SOFI | 0.525 | 0.573 | Moderate |
| META | 0.496 | 0.476 | Moderate |
| APP | 0.446 | 0.431 | Moderate |
| AMZN | 0.429 | 0.430 | Moderate |
| HOOD | 0.425 | 0.491 | Moderate |
| PLTR | 0.424 | 0.517 | Moderate |
| APH | 0.423 | 0.487 | Moderate |
| EBAY | 0.419 | 0.456 | Moderate |
| DAL | 0.415 | 0.501 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare CVNA to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.