Gold Fields Limited (GFI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 10.1x earnings — a 72% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — GFI is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 9/9, Altman Z 6.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $99 implies 102% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of GFI present a compelling dichotomy between exceptional operational efficiency and deteriorating profitability signals. The company generates substantial value creation, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of 22.8%, driven primarily by high leverage rather than organic margin expansion or asset turnover; the DuPont decomposition reveals that while net margins are robust at 40.8%, equity multipliers alone account for a significant portion of the 41.1% ROE, with asset turnover remaining modest at 0.57x. Creditworthiness appears historically strong given a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 5.9, yet this stability contrasts sharply with recent profitability factor data showing an RMW score of -0.691, suggesting the market may be discounting future earnings quality despite current revenue growth exceeding 68% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics currently display a significant divergence from intrinsic value models and historical norms. Trading at a P/E multiple of 12.1x, the stock appears materially undervalued relative to its DCF fair value estimate of $113, which implies a potential upside of approximately 148%. However, this valuation gap exists within a context where implied free cash flow growth is projected conservatively at just 2.9% over the next decade, indicating that current pricing may already incorporate expectations for slower expansion or heightened risk premiums not yet reflected in the discount rate. The market's willingness to price such high upside suggests either a belief in near-term catalysts accelerating FCF generation or an expectation of mean reversion in the profitability metrics currently dragging down factor scores.
Risk-adjusted performance indicators reveal complex positioning relative to standard equity factors. While the stock exhibits substantial positive momentum with a Fama-French Alpha of 69.15% annually, this outperformance is counterbalanced by negative exposures to both value and profitability dimensions, registering HML at -0.207 and RMW at -0.691. This factor profile suggests the security behaves more like a growth asset with weak relative profitability characteristics rather than a traditional high-quality compounder, creating an environment where short-term alpha generation may be decoupled from long-term fundamental durability if margin compression or leverage deleveraging occurs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 68% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.6% | 9.6% | 11.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $123 | $88 | $68 |
| 3% | $146 | $99 | $74 |
| 4% | $183 | $114 | $82 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $38.56.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $99 (+102.5%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 121% above its 5-year average P/E of 5.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedGold Fields Limited is currently trading at $40.67 within the Basic Materials sector, presenting a snapshot where institutional positioning can be inferred through specific technical alignments. The presence of Simple Moving Average crossovers suggests that larger market participants may have recently shifted their tactical stance regarding medium-term trends, potentially indicating a transition from accumulation to distribution or vice versa depending on whether short-term averages are piercing longer-term baselines. When volume trends coincide with these moving average interactions, they often serve as a confirmation mechanism for institutional intent; rising volumes alongside price breaks typically signal that significant capital is actively engaging in the security, whereas declining volume during similar moves might imply a lack of sustained commitment from major holders. The current price action relative to these dynamic averages offers clues about where liquidity clusters are forming and how professional traders are managing their exposure levels. If the stock maintains strength above key moving average thresholds while exhibiting robust trading activity, it could reflect continued confidence among large entities holding long positions. Conversely, if price retreats below these lines with diminishing volume, it may suggest that institutional players are reducing leverage or exiting rallies to lock in gains. These technical configurations do not dictate future performance but rather highlight areas where significant order flow has historically occurred, allowing observers to gauge the intensity of buying versus selling pressure without assigning a definitive directional bias.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | $1.4420 | +284.5% |
| 2025-03-14 | $0.3750 | +121.9% |
| 2024-09-13 | $0.1690 | -22.8% |
| 2024-03-14 | $0.2190 | +28.1% |
| 2023-09-07 | $0.1710 | -29.6% |
| 2023-03-16 | $0.2430 | +36.5% |
| 2022-09-15 | $0.1780 | +2.3% |
| 2022-03-10 | $0.1740 | +26.1% |
| 2021-09-09 | $0.1380 | -36.7% |
| 2021-03-11 | $0.2180 | +134.4% |
| 2020-09-10 | $0.0930 | +38.8% |
| 2020-03-12 | $0.0670 | +71.8% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VWO or SPEM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell GFI shares regardless of Gold Fields Limited's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to GFI through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Gold Fields Limited to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Gold Fields Limited (GFI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with GFI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
GFI Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 29 GFI shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.3% of the Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund (VWO) and 0.3% of the SPEM (SPEM). Across 8 tracked ETFs, approximately 31M shares (3.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest GFI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
GFI Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Gold Fields Limited over the past year sits near $39.88 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $38.56 sits 3.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
GFI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Gold Fields Limited convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Gold Fields Limited converts 37% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 63% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 22.0% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | 3 | $42.48 | $127.44 |
| 2026-04-20 | 3,740 | $49.96 | $186,850.4 |
| 2026-04-13 | 10,252 | $49.34 | $505,833.68 |
| 2026-04-10 | 4,671 | $48.83 | $228,084.93 |
| 2026-04-06 | 441 | $47.58 | $20,982.78 |
| 2026-04-01 | 11,136 | $45.40 | $505,574.4 |
| 2026-03-25 | 6,135 | $40.66 | $249,449.1 |
| 2026-03-20 | 391 | $40.75 | $15,933.25 |
| 2026-03-17 | 49,754 | $47.34 | $2.4M |
| 2026-03-13 | 100 | $50.95 | $5,095 |
| 2026-03-12 | 471 | $50.59 | $23,827.89 |
| 2026-03-10 | 25,575 | $52.13 | $1.3M |
| 2026-02-17 | 5 | $54.60 | $273 |
| 2026-02-12 | 10,608 | $57.27 | $607,520.16 |
| 2026-02-05 | 13,917 | $52.54 | $731,199.18 |
| 2026-02-03 | 209,640 | $49.95 | $10.5M |
| 2026-02-02 | 241,252 | $50.12 | $12.1M |
| 2026-01-29 | 15,474 | $61.51 | $951,805.74 |
| 2026-01-20 | 601 | $49.41 | $29,695.41 |
| 2026-01-13 | 320 | $48.54 | $15,532.8 |
| 2026-01-09 | 991 | $45.56 | $45,149.96 |
| 2025-12-31 | 1,285 | $44.12 | $56,694.2 |
| 2025-12-22 | 400 | $45.16 | $18,064 |
| 2025-12-19 | 1 | $44.17 | $44.17 |
| 2025-12-18 | 7,504 | $44.61 | $334,753.44 |
| 2025-12-17 | 29,469 | $43.79 | $1.3M |
| 2025-12-16 | 8,859 | $43.94 | $389,264.46 |
| 2025-12-12 | 14 | $45.10 | $631.4 |
| 2025-12-04 | 414 | $40.84 | $16,907.76 |
| 2025-12-03 | 32,331 | $41.38 | $1.3M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| GB00BRXH2664 | 0.900 | 0.904 | High co-movement |
| AU | 0.900 | 0.904 | High co-movement |
| NEM | 0.834 | 0.894 | High co-movement |
| RGLD | 0.776 | 0.819 | High co-movement |
| GB00BL6K5J42 | 0.772 | 0.787 | High co-movement |
| HL | 0.651 | 0.749 | Moderate |
| CDE | 0.632 | 0.763 | Moderate |
| GB00B2QPKJ12 | 0.631 | 0.627 | Moderate |
| MXP554091415 | 0.546 | 0.635 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare GFI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.