PBF (PBF)

$5.1B
Market Cap
11.4
P/E Ratio
0.23
Beta
2.55%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 2/9Beneish M -2.58 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of PBF reveal a distressed operational profile characterized by negative capital efficiency and profitability. An ROIC-WACC spread of -0.2% indicates the company is currently destroying value rather than generating returns above its cost of capital, while a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -2.9% underscores this deterioration through a confluence of a -0.5% net margin, elevated asset turnover at 2.25x, and significant leverage with an equity multiplier of 2.39x. This financial weakness is corroborated by the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, signaling severe fundamental degradation across multiple dimensions, including negative gross margins of -1.9% and revenue contraction of 11.4% year-over-year. Although the Beneish M-Score of -2.58 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, it does not mitigate the reality that the business is operating in a loss-making regime with shrinking top-line activity.

Valuation metrics for PBF are currently decoupled from traditional growth narratives due to its negative earnings base and declining revenue trajectory. With net margins compressed into the red and sales falling sharply, standard multiple comparisons become less meaningful as the denominator erodes; however, the market appears to be pricing in continued operational headwinds rather than a turnaround catalyst given the lack of positive momentum indicators. The absence of implied growth support is evident when viewed against the backdrop of an F-Score that flags deteriorating financial health, suggesting current valuations may reflect a "value trap" scenario where low multiples fail to account for the structural challenges inherent in negative ROIC and shrinking cash flows.

Insider activity presents a stark divergence from any potential recovery thesis, with $414 million in net insider selling over the past 90 days serving as a potent risk signal. This substantial outflow by management aligns with the deteriorating Piotroski metrics and reinforces concerns regarding capital preservation amidst negative operating leverage. While the low Beneish score implies transparency in reporting, the combination of aggressive insider disposition, revenue contraction, and value-destroying ROIC creates an asymmetric risk profile where downside potential outweighs any speculative upside from mean reversion.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

2/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-2.58
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

-1.9%
Gross Margin
-0.5%
Net Margin
-0.2%
ROIC
-11.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+70.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-783.2M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-0.5%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
2.25x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.39x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-2.9%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven by high asset turnover — an efficient, capital-light business.

Balance Sheet Health

1.39x
Debt / Equity
1.21x
Current Ratio
-0.1x
Interest Coverage
2.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
634.1M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$414M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
23
Sale Transactions
2026-03-26NIMBLEY THOMAS J.Sold 2/8 qtrsSale$3M
2026-03-26NIMBLEY THOMAS J.Sold 2/8 qtrsGrant$1M
2026-03-26LUCEY MATTHEW C.Grant$7M
2026-03-25CONTROL EMPRESARIAL DE CAPITALES, S.A. DSale$57M
2026-03-24CANTY TRECIA MSold 3/8 qtrsSale$3M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-3.29
Act: $-3.09
+6.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-1.21
Act: $-1.03
+15.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.75
Act: $-0.52
+30.9%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.11
Act: $0.49
+550.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.95
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$52.18
52W High
$16.47
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$234M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PBF
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$238B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PBF shares regardless of PBF's individual fundamentals. We estimate $234M of passive capital is structurally linked to PBF through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PBF's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in PBF to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PBF Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PBFEpicenterVYMETFVBRETFMDYETFXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow RiskOVVMed RiskDINOLow Risk
PBF Price Drop (%)0

If PBF (PBF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PBF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PBF Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
PBF

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PBF Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does PBF convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-783,200,000
EBITDA
$634M
FCF Conversion
-124%
Reinvestment Rate
224%
-124% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

PBF converts -124% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 224% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-087,510$40.59$304,830.9
2026-05-0720$41.59$831.8
2026-05-06811$46.19$37,460.09
2026-05-01448$43.36$19,425.28
2026-04-24248$40.97$10,160.56
2026-04-222,648$40.69$107,747.12
2026-04-0717$46.37$788.29
2026-04-066,878$45.39$312,192.42
2026-03-261,426$49.35$70,373.1
2026-03-2415,579$46.59$725,825.61
2026-03-2316,069$49.32$792,523.08
2026-03-203,184$46.83$149,106.72
2026-03-1786$43.57$3,747.02
2026-03-13294$42.92$12,618.48
2026-03-12189$41.99$7,936.11
2026-03-099$43.25$389.25
2026-03-048$39.76$318.08
2026-02-0525,560$35.29$902,012.4
2026-02-046,518$34.46$224,610.28
2026-01-293,399$32.90$111,827.1
2026-01-2258$32.82$1,903.56
2026-01-214,277$30.79$131,688.83
2026-01-0223,906$27.12$648,330.72
2025-12-29808$26.15$21,129.2
2025-12-222,809$26.35$74,017.15
2025-12-1129,858$31.75$947,991.5
2025-12-0522,559$33.38$753,019.42
2025-12-0416,050$33.79$542,329.5
2025-11-211,656$34.75$57,546
2025-11-2015$37.46$561.9

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare PBF to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.