Regency Centers Corporation (REG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 26.6x earnings — a 44% discount to the sector average of 47.4x — REG is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Regency Centers Corporation present a distinct divergence between profitability metrics and capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are driven primarily by high net margins (34.0%) rather than asset turnover or leverage, this is counterbalanced by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -4.2%, indicating current investments destroy value relative to the cost of capital. Despite these efficiency concerns, financial stability appears robust with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.52 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk; however, an Altman Z-Score of 1.6 flags potential distress territory that warrants scrutiny alongside the negative spread.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in growth expectations significantly higher than historical norms or sector peers. The current P/E multiple of 27.3x stands well below the REIT sector average of 87.1x, yet it remains elevated relative to a company generating limited capital efficiency as evidenced by the negative spread. While factor analysis highlights robust profitability (RMW: 0.366) and a value tilt (HML: 0.168), these positive attributes are offset by an annual Fama-French alpha of -3.20%, implying underperformance relative to standard risk factors over the measured period.
Insider activity further complicates the risk-reward profile, with $17.6 million in net selling observed over the last 90 days, which often signals management caution regarding near-term prospects or valuation levels. The synthesis of these data points paints a picture of a profitable entity operating below its cost of capital on new investments while trading at a discount to sector multiples, yet facing insider distribution and negative risk-adjusted returns that suggest the market may be pricing in future margin expansion rather than current operational efficiency.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 10% above its 5-year average P/E of 25.2x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe security's current price of $77.25 is above both its 50-day simple moving average ($73.37) and its 200-day simple moving average ($70.12), indicating an upward trend in the medium to long term. With a Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 57.9, the security appears to be in overbought territory but still within a range that suggests ongoing buying pressure without extreme conditions.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | $0.7550 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-15 | $0.7550 | +7.1% |
| 2025-09-11 | $0.7050 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-11 | $0.7050 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-12 | $0.7050 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-16 | $0.7050 | +5.2% |
| 2024-09-12 | $0.6700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-12 | $0.6700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-12 | $0.6700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-13 | $0.6700 | +3.1% |
| 2023-09-13 | $0.6500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-13 | $0.6500 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLRE or SPYD, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell REG shares regardless of Regency Centers Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to REG through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Regency Centers Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Regency Centers Corporation (REG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with REG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
REG Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 REG shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Regency Centers Corporation (REG) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.3% of the State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) and 1.3% of the SPYD (SPYD). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 30M shares (16.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest REG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
REG Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Regency Centers Corporation over the past year sits near $69.30 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $76.03 trades 9.7% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 4,858 | $76.67 | $372,462.86 |
| 2026-05-08 | 6 | $77.86 | $467.16 |
| 2026-05-01 | 3,562 | $77.85 | $277,301.7 |
| 2026-04-27 | 282,289 | $80.19 | $22.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 8,658 | $79.65 | $689,609.7 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $78.33 | $78.33 |
| 2026-04-10 | 1 | $78.35 | $78.35 |
| 2026-04-07 | 94,169 | $76.63 | $7.2M |
| 2026-03-25 | 18 | $74.58 | $1,342.44 |
| 2026-03-24 | 5 | $74.65 | $373.25 |
| 2026-02-19 | 115 | $75.72 | $8,707.8 |
| 2026-02-09 | 107 | $75.22 | $8,048.54 |
| 2026-02-06 | 37 | $75.48 | $2,792.76 |
| 2026-01-30 | 6,039 | $71.98 | $434,687.22 |
| 2026-01-29 | 307 | $70.45 | $21,628.15 |
| 2026-01-28 | 183 | $71.29 | $13,046.07 |
| 2026-01-08 | 114 | $69.99 | $7,978.86 |
| 2025-12-24 | 40,323 | $69.12 | $2.8M |
| 2025-12-19 | 92 | $67.71 | $6,229.32 |
| 2025-12-18 | 6 | $68.05 | $408.3 |
| 2025-12-16 | 15 | $68.25 | $1,023.75 |
| 2025-12-15 | 40 | $67.76 | $2,710.4 |
| 2025-12-05 | 456 | $69.07 | $31,495.92 |
| 2025-11-28 | 18,867 | $71.26 | $1.3M |
| 2025-11-26 | 139 | $71.07 | $9,878.73 |
| 2025-11-17 | 2,447 | $69.59 | $170,286.73 |
| 2025-11-13 | 22 | $70.00 | $1,540 |
| 2025-11-06 | 13 | $69.42 | $902.46 |
| 2025-11-03 | 3 | $68.95 | $206.85 |
| 2025-10-29 | 66,300 | $71.54 | $4.7M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| VRTPX | 0.789 | 0.704 | High co-movement |
| FRT | 0.780 | 0.789 | High co-movement |
| KIM | 0.762 | 0.738 | High co-movement |
| BRX | 0.748 | 0.725 | High co-movement |
| EGP | 0.648 | 0.582 | Moderate |
| SPG | 0.647 | 0.614 | Moderate |
| EQR | 0.625 | 0.554 | Moderate |
| UDR | 0.607 | 0.560 | Moderate |
| PLD | 0.598 | 0.553 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare REG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.