Real Estate / REIT - Retail

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM)

$23.71
+0.30%
$16.2B
Market Cap
27.7
P/E Ratio
0.99
Beta
4.32%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 1.3 DistressBeneish M -2.62 CleanROIC−WACC -5.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 27.7x earnings — a 42% discount to the sector average of 47.4x — KIM is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.3.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Kimco Realty Corporation reveal a capital allocation challenge despite robust operational efficiency. The firm generates significant earnings power, evidenced by a net margin of 27.3% and an F-Score of 8/9 indicating strong financial health, yet this profitability is constrained by low asset turnover of 0.11x and leverage at 1.86x, resulting in a DuPont ROE of only 5.5%. More critically, the return on invested capital stands at 3.4%, which trails the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 8.8% by 5.5 percentage points; this negative spread suggests that current operations are destroying value relative to the required hurdle rate for equity holders. While the Altman Z-Score of 1.3 and Beneish M-Score of -2.62 point to potential solvency concerns and low earnings manipulation risk respectively, the core issue remains the inability to generate returns above the cost of capital in a mature asset class.

Valuation metrics present a complex picture where price appears disconnected from historical norms but justified by sector-wide multiples. The current P/E ratio of 27.6x is substantially lower than the sector average of 87.1x, yet it remains elevated relative to its own fundamental generation capabilities given the negative ROIC-WACC spread. This pricing dynamic implies that the market may be discounting future growth expectations or penalizing specific balance sheet risks rather than reflecting standard profitability valuations for a firm with such high gross margins (69.0%) and steady revenue expansion of 5.1% year-over-year. The divergence between the company's specific valuation and its peer group suggests that investors are pricing in distinct risk premiums, potentially offsetting the value tilt indicated by the HML factor score of 0.157.

Risk-adjusted performance data further complicates the investment thesis through a lens of systematic underperformance. Although the Beneish M-Score supports earnings integrity and the Profitability Factor (RMW) registers a positive 0.608, indicating strong relative profitability within its style box, the annual Fama-French Alpha is negative at -2.22%. This persistent alpha drag suggests that after accounting for market beta, size, value, and other risk factors, the stock has failed to generate excess returns over the benchmark period. Coupled with recent insider activity showing $198,872 in net selling over 90 days, these signals collectively highlight a divergence between operational metrics like high margins and the actual risk-adjusted compensation provided by the equity, leaving the risk-reward profile dependent on whether future capital deployment can reverse the current negative spread.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

27.7x
KIM P/E
47.4x
Sector Avg
24.5x
5Y Avg P/E
-42%
vs Sector

Currently trading 16% above its 5-year average P/E of 24.5x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

Kimco Realty Corporation currently trades at $24.11, a price level that sits within the broader context of its real estate sector dynamics. The technical landscape suggests a period where momentum is heavily influenced by underlying structural pressures rather than isolated short-term catalysts. In this environment, any observed drawdown or volatility spike should be interpreted not merely as market noise but potentially as a reflection of deeper fundamental adjustments specific to the asset class. When price action lacks strong supporting volume or clear trend confirmation at these levels, it often indicates that current movement is fragile and susceptible to reversal upon minor shifts in sentiment or macroeconomic data. The interplay between recent price fluctuations and sector-wide headwinds implies that risk dynamics are currently skewed toward caution. Without a definitive breakout above key resistance zones or a stabilization of trading ranges, the prevailing technical structure does not support sustained upward pressure. Instead, the market appears to be testing whether existing valuations can hold against continued scrutiny of cash flows and occupancy rates inherent to the REIT model. This setup creates an environment where downside protection becomes as critical as upside potential, suggesting that any acceleration in price needs to demonstrate resilience before being viewed as a structural shift rather than temporary volatility. Ultimately, the current configuration highlights the delicate balance between speculative interest and fundamental reality for this specific equity. The absence of clear directional dominance means that participants must remain vigilant regarding how external factors influence intraday and weekly patterns. Whether the recent activity represents a healthy consolidation or a warning sign depends entirely on

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.3
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.62
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

69.0%
Gross Margin
27.3%
Net Margin
3.4%
ROIC
8.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.4%— Negative spread.
+5.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+42.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

27.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.11x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.86x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
5.5%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.86x
Debt / Equity
3.31x
Current Ratio
2.5x
Interest Coverage
5.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.4B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-198,872
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-02-19LOURENSO FRANKSold 2/8 qtrsGrant7,720 shares
2026-02-19COHEN GLENN GARYGrant31,770 shares
2026-02-19COOPER ROSSGrant31,770 shares
2026-02-19RICHARDSON VALERIEGrant7,720 shares
2026-02-19MONIZ HENRYGrant7,720 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.18
+5.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.18
+2.9%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.19
Act: $0.19
-2.6%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.19
Act: $0.19
-3.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.2600
Latest Dividend
$1.01
2025 Total
+4.1%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.04
2016
$1.09
2017
$1.12
2018
$1.12
2019
$0.54
2020
$0.68
2021
$0.84
2022
$1.02
2023
$0.97
2024
$1.01
2025
$0.26
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-06$0.26000.0%
2025-12-05$0.2600+4.0%
2025-09-05$0.25000.0%
2025-06-06$0.25000.0%
2025-03-07$0.25000.0%
2024-12-05$0.2500+4.2%
2024-09-05$0.24000.0%
2024-06-06$0.24000.0%
2024-03-06$0.2400-27.3%
2023-12-06$0.3300+43.5%
2023-09-06$0.23000.0%
2023-06-07$0.23000.0%
Stock Splits
2005-08-24: 2:12001-12-24: 1.5:11995-12-22: 1.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

22.2%
Annual Volatility
0.81
Sharpe (1Y)
-12.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.81
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.570
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.157
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.608
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.439
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -2.22%
R²: 52.4%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

27.9
Forward P/E
3.37
PEG Ratio
1.56
Price/Book
5M
Avg Volume
$24.62
52W High
$19.76
52W Low
81%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.1B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding KIM
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$5.9T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLRE or SPYD, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KIM shares regardless of Kimco Realty Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to KIM through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Kimco Realty Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

KIM Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
KIMEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFVRTPXUnknownWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskPLDMed Risk
KIM Price Drop (%)0

If Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KIM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

KIM Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 KIM shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
KIM
Total Shares
674M
ETF Lock-Up
20.5%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
20.5%Locked Float

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.7% of the State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) and 1.4% of the SPYD (SPYD). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 138M shares (20.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.

Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

KIM Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
KIM
PRICE
$23.71
FLOOR (POC)
$20.04
STRENGTH
High
$20$208%$20POC 12%$2012%$2110%$217%$21$21$22$22$22$22$23$23$237%$23$24$23.71$24$24$24
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Kimco Realty Corporation over the past year sits near $20.04 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $23.71 trades 18.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1422,056$23.08$509,052.48
2026-05-13118$23.55$2,778.9
2026-05-07196$23.80$4,664.8
2026-05-0441$23.38$958.58
2026-04-206,654$24.19$160,960.26
2026-04-156$23.60$141.6
2026-04-068$22.60$180.8
2026-03-2568$22.56$1,534.08
2026-03-1722,010$23.19$510,411.9
2026-03-10589$23.20$13,664.8
2026-03-094$23.28$93.12
2026-03-0612$23.51$282.12
2026-03-0512$23.56$282.72
2026-03-0413$23.53$305.89
2026-03-029,194$23.55$216,518.7
2026-02-2780,201$23.64$1.9M
2026-02-2494,657$23.41$2.2M
2026-02-0622$21.69$477.18
2026-02-0312,383$20.83$257,937.89
2026-02-0239,379$21.08$830,109.32
2026-01-28134,927$20.94$2.8M
2026-01-271,704$20.85$35,528.4
2026-01-26403$20.96$8,446.88
2026-01-20271,984$21.06$5.7M
2026-01-1697,074$20.78$2.0M
2026-01-0819$20.31$385.89
2026-01-026$20.27$121.62
2025-12-2656$20.42$1,143.52
2025-12-19353$20.28$7,158.84
2025-12-02240$20.49$4,917.6

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
BRX0.8550.830High co-movement
FRT0.8160.740High co-movement
VRTPX0.7740.720High co-movement
REG0.7620.738High co-movement
EGP0.6580.576Moderate
PLD0.6330.574Moderate
SPG0.6230.557Moderate
CUBE0.6170.616Moderate
EXR0.5930.599Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare KIM to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.