Real Estate / REIT - Retail

Regency Centers Corporation (REG)

$76.03
-0.14%
$14.5B
Market Cap
26.6
P/E Ratio
0.84
Beta
3.91%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.6 DistressBeneish M -2.52 CleanROIC−WACC -4.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 26.6x earnings — a 44% discount to the sector average of 47.4x — REG is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.6.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Regency Centers Corporation present a distinct divergence between profitability metrics and capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are driven primarily by high net margins (34.0%) rather than asset turnover or leverage, this is counterbalanced by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -4.2%, indicating current investments destroy value relative to the cost of capital. Despite these efficiency concerns, financial stability appears robust with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.52 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk; however, an Altman Z-Score of 1.6 flags potential distress territory that warrants scrutiny alongside the negative spread.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in growth expectations significantly higher than historical norms or sector peers. The current P/E multiple of 27.3x stands well below the REIT sector average of 87.1x, yet it remains elevated relative to a company generating limited capital efficiency as evidenced by the negative spread. While factor analysis highlights robust profitability (RMW: 0.366) and a value tilt (HML: 0.168), these positive attributes are offset by an annual Fama-French alpha of -3.20%, implying underperformance relative to standard risk factors over the measured period.

Insider activity further complicates the risk-reward profile, with $17.6 million in net selling observed over the last 90 days, which often signals management caution regarding near-term prospects or valuation levels. The synthesis of these data points paints a picture of a profitable entity operating below its cost of capital on new investments while trading at a discount to sector multiples, yet facing insider distribution and negative risk-adjusted returns that suggest the market may be pricing in future margin expansion rather than current operational efficiency.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

26.6x
REG P/E
47.4x
Sector Avg
25.2x
5Y Avg P/E
-44%
vs Sector

Currently trading 10% above its 5-year average P/E of 25.2x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The security's current price of $77.25 is above both its 50-day simple moving average ($73.37) and its 200-day simple moving average ($70.12), indicating an upward trend in the medium to long term. With a Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 57.9, the security appears to be in overbought territory but still within a range that suggests ongoing buying pressure without extreme conditions.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.52
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

70.6%
Gross Margin
34.0%
Net Margin
4.7%
ROIC
8.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.2%— Negative spread.
+6.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+31.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

34.0%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.12x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.81x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
7.3%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.81x
Debt / Equity
0.80x
Current Ratio
3.6x
Interest Coverage
4.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.1B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$18M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
5
Sale Transactions
2026-03-11STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JRSold 4/8 qtrsSale$13M
2026-03-10STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JRSold 4/8 qtrsGrant6,460 shares
2026-02-20STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JRSold 4/8 qtrsSale$763,001
2026-02-12HERMAN MICHAEL R.Sold 1/8 qtrsOther7,459 shares
2026-02-12MAS MICHAEL JSold 2/8 qtrsOther26,196 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.56
Act: $0.58
+4.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.54
Act: $0.56
+4.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.55
Act: $0.58
+4.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.58
Act: $1.09
+89.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.7550
Latest Dividend
$2.87
2025 Total
+5.7%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.50
2016
$2.10
2017
$2.22
2018
$2.34
2019
$2.38
2020
$2.41
2021
$2.52
2022
$2.62
2023
$2.72
2024
$2.87
2025
$0.76
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-11$0.75500.0%
2025-12-15$0.7550+7.1%
2025-09-11$0.70500.0%
2025-06-11$0.70500.0%
2025-03-12$0.70500.0%
2024-12-16$0.7050+5.2%
2024-09-12$0.67000.0%
2024-06-12$0.67000.0%
2024-03-12$0.67000.0%
2023-12-13$0.6700+3.1%
2023-09-13$0.65000.0%
2023-06-13$0.65000.0%

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

18.2%
Annual Volatility
0.76
Sharpe (1Y)
-12.4%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.62
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.211
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.168
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.366
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.334
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -3.20%
R²: 39.5%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

30.7
Forward P/E
2.61
PEG Ratio
2.12
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$81.66
52W High
$66.86
52W Low
62%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.2B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding REG
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$3.8T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLRE or SPYD, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell REG shares regardless of Regency Centers Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to REG through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Regency Centers Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

REG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
REGEpicenterVOOETFIVVETFSPYETFVRTPXUnknownWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskPLDMed Risk
REG Price Drop (%)0

If Regency Centers Corporation (REG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with REG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

REG Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 REG shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
REG
Total Shares
183M
ETF Lock-Up
16.5%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
16.5%Locked Float

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.3% of the State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) and 1.3% of the SPYD (SPYD). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 30M shares (16.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

REG Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
REG
PRICE
$76.03
FLOOR (POC)
$69.30
STRENGTH
High
$66$67$689%$6912%$69POC 14%$7014%$717%$72$72$73$74$75$76$76.03$76$776%$786%$79$80$80$81
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Regency Centers Corporation over the past year sits near $69.30 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $76.03 trades 9.7% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-144,858$76.67$372,462.86
2026-05-086$77.86$467.16
2026-05-013,562$77.85$277,301.7
2026-04-27282,289$80.19$22.6M
2026-04-178,658$79.65$689,609.7
2026-04-141$78.33$78.33
2026-04-101$78.35$78.35
2026-04-0794,169$76.63$7.2M
2026-03-2518$74.58$1,342.44
2026-03-245$74.65$373.25
2026-02-19115$75.72$8,707.8
2026-02-09107$75.22$8,048.54
2026-02-0637$75.48$2,792.76
2026-01-306,039$71.98$434,687.22
2026-01-29307$70.45$21,628.15
2026-01-28183$71.29$13,046.07
2026-01-08114$69.99$7,978.86
2025-12-2440,323$69.12$2.8M
2025-12-1992$67.71$6,229.32
2025-12-186$68.05$408.3
2025-12-1615$68.25$1,023.75
2025-12-1540$67.76$2,710.4
2025-12-05456$69.07$31,495.92
2025-11-2818,867$71.26$1.3M
2025-11-26139$71.07$9,878.73
2025-11-172,447$69.59$170,286.73
2025-11-1322$70.00$1,540
2025-11-0613$69.42$902.46
2025-11-033$68.95$206.85
2025-10-2966,300$71.54$4.7M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
VRTPX0.7890.704High co-movement
FRT0.7800.789High co-movement
KIM0.7620.738High co-movement
BRX0.7480.725High co-movement
EGP0.6480.582Moderate
SPG0.6470.614Moderate
EQR0.6250.554Moderate
UDR0.6070.560Moderate
PLD0.5980.553Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare REG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.