EchoStar Corporation (SATS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of -0.7 falls in the academic distress zone.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of SATS reveal a severe deterioration in capital efficiency and earnings generation, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread that is deeply negative at -44.8%, signaling potential value destruction rather than creation. The DuPont decomposition underscores this distress: while asset turnover remains moderate at 0.35x and leverage sits at 7.40x, the catastrophic net margin contraction of -96.6% drives a total ROE collapse to -249.4%. This operational weakness is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of only 3/9 and a Profitability Factor (RMW) of -0.681, indicating persistent struggles in generating sustainable returns despite maintaining a gross margin of 25.8% amid revenue contraction. Although the Beneish M-Score of -4.07 suggests low probability of manipulation, the underlying financial trajectory points to significant operational headwinds rather than accounting distortions.
Valuation metrics are not provided in the current dataset; however, the market's pricing mechanism appears to have already factored in extreme downside risk given the company's inability to post positive net income or demonstrate profitable growth. The absence of forward-looking valuation multiples implies that traditional DCF models would yield negative fair values unless aggressive turnaround assumptions regarding margin recovery and revenue stabilization are adopted. Consequently, the current price likely reflects a worst-case scenario where the market has priced in continued losses rather than anticipating an imminent reversal to profitability.
Risk factor analysis presents a complex divergence between historical performance and recent capital flows. While the stock exhibits a substantial Fama-French Alpha of 76.24% annually, suggesting strong outperformance relative to its risk profile over time, this is counterbalanced by severe fundamental degradation including negative ROIC and declining revenue. The Value Factor (HML) score of 0.561 indicates a value tilt, yet the weak profitability factor complicates any straightforward valuation thesis. Most critically, insider activity shows $15.5 million in net selling over the last ninety days, which contrasts sharply with the high alpha and suggests that management may be exiting positions despite the stock's historical outperformance relative to its risk factors.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or IWN, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SATS shares regardless of EchoStar Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to SATS through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in EchoStar Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If EchoStar Corporation (SATS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SATS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SATS Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 SATS shares, reducing daily market volatility.
EchoStar Corporation (SATS) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.6% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 1.1% of the IWN (IWN). Across 16 tracked ETFs, approximately 26M shares (16.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest SATS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SATS Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for EchoStar Corporation over the past year sits near $124.09 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $123.55 sits 0.4% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 5,047 | $129.38 | $652,980.86 |
| 2026-05-12 | 382 | $129.14 | $49,331.48 |
| 2026-05-11 | 18,624 | $127.15 | $2.4M |
| 2026-05-08 | 596 | $122.62 | $73,081.52 |
| 2026-05-07 | 85,266 | $125.75 | $10.7M |
| 2026-05-06 | 3,420 | $117.34 | $401,302.8 |
| 2026-05-04 | 12,310 | $123.18 | $1.5M |
| 2026-05-01 | 20 | $123.14 | $2,462.8 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,641 | $119.78 | $196,558.98 |
| 2026-04-29 | 8,034 | $123.70 | $993,805.8 |
| 2026-04-28 | 14,660 | $121.63 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-27 | 4,075 | $117.50 | $478,812.5 |
| 2026-04-21 | 1,098 | $135.11 | $148,350.78 |
| 2026-04-20 | 11,674 | $133.21 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 1 | $132.50 | $132.5 |
| 2026-04-16 | 7,734 | $131.39 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-15 | 9,521 | $130.47 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-13 | 31,268 | $128.59 | $4.0M |
| 2026-04-10 | 5,624 | $120.09 | $675,386.16 |
| 2026-04-09 | 297 | $122.82 | $36,477.54 |
| 2026-04-08 | 329 | $124.77 | $41,049.33 |
| 2026-04-07 | 1,109 | $126.95 | $140,787.55 |
| 2026-04-06 | 107,864 | $128.68 | $13.9M |
| 2026-04-02 | 75,139 | $120.60 | $9.1M |
| 2026-04-01 | 75 | $117.07 | $8,780.25 |
| 2026-03-31 | 16,490 | $112.23 | $1.9M |
| 2026-03-30 | 6,621 | $115.21 | $762,805.41 |
| 2026-03-25 | 8 | $110.84 | $886.72 |
| 2026-03-23 | 182,728 | $109.84 | $20.1M |
| 2026-03-19 | 5 | $107.75 | $538.75 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| GSAT | 0.259 | 0.418 | Low correlation |
| ROKU | 0.234 | 0.314 | Low correlation |
| VSAT | 0.222 | 0.428 | Low correlation |
| HEI | 0.201 | 0.141 | Low correlation |
| RKLB | 0.189 | 0.471 | Low correlation |
| BK | 0.184 | 0.209 | Low correlation |
| FN | 0.181 | 0.218 | Low correlation |
| TD | 0.178 | 0.276 | Low correlation |
| EL | 0.177 | 0.194 | Low correlation |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare SATS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.