VSEC (VSEC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 6.2 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of -2.05 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a distinct tension between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While the revenue growth rate of 41.5% YoY suggests strong momentum, the ROIC-WACC spread of -8.6% indicates that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital; this negative spread implies operations are not generating returns sufficient to cover financing costs and risk premiums. The DuPont decomposition reveals a margin-constrained profile with net margins compressed at 1.1%, despite gross margins holding steady near 12%. However, credit quality metrics remain robust: the Altman Z-Score of 6.2 signals low bankruptcy risk, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.05 and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 point to clean accounting practices and strong financial health respectively.
Valuation dynamics reflect a significant premium over historical norms despite current multiples appearing depressed relative to recent history. The current P/E ratio stands at 90.2x, which is down approximately 52% from the five-year average of 140.9x, yet it remains substantially elevated compared to typical sector benchmarks for firms with such thin net margins. This compression likely stems from market skepticism regarding sustainability given the negative ROIC-WACC spread, even as implied free cash flow growth over a ten-year horizon is projected at an aggressive 50%. The market appears to be pricing in high future profitability that has not yet materialized in current earnings per share or bottom-line margins.
Risk and reward profiles suggest a binary outcome dependent on execution of margin expansion. While the low Piotroski score and clean Beneish metrics mitigate concerns about financial engineering, the structural inability to generate returns above the cost of capital creates an overhang that must be resolved for valuation support to strengthen. The divergence between high revenue growth and negative economic value added indicates that future stock performance will hinge entirely on whether operating leverage can drive net margins higher or if the business model requires a strategic pivot to improve capital allocation efficiency before the current multiple contraction stabilizes into a floor.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-15 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-16 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-01 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-01-23 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-06 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-07-17 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-01 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-01-24 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-10-31 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-07-11 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XAR or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VSEC shares regardless of VSEC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $309M of passive capital is structurally linked to VSEC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VSEC's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in VSEC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If VSEC (VSEC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VSEC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
VSEC Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 15 VSEC shares, reducing daily market volatility.
VSEC (VSEC) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.4% of the XAR (XAR) and 0.6% of the SLYG (SLYG). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 2M shares (6.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest VSEC Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
VSEC Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for VSEC over the past year sits near $180.76 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $180.19 sits 0.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
VSEC Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does VSEC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
VSEC converts 4% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 96% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-8.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 91 | $207.45 | $18,877.95 |
| 2026-04-30 | 780 | $160.17 | $124,932.6 |
| 2026-04-27 | 265 | $178.83 | $47,389.95 |
| 2026-04-21 | 967 | $225.09 | $217,662.03 |
| 2026-04-15 | 2,850 | $222.33 | $633,640.5 |
| 2026-04-10 | 2,912 | $218.28 | $635,631.36 |
| 2026-04-07 | 51,922 | $190.79 | $9.9M |
| 2026-03-26 | 134 | $178.32 | $23,894.88 |
| 2026-03-23 | 139,224 | $177.33 | $24.7M |
| 2026-03-13 | 8,857 | $199.88 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-09 | 30 | $209.39 | $6,281.7 |
| 2026-03-03 | 59 | $221.95 | $13,095.05 |
| 2026-03-02 | 557 | $227.07 | $126,477.99 |
| 2026-02-27 | 8,026 | $226.50 | $1.8M |
| 2026-02-20 | 3,313 | $224.65 | $744,265.45 |
| 2026-02-19 | 677 | $217.46 | $147,220.42 |
| 2026-02-18 | 375 | $213.34 | $80,002.5 |
| 2026-02-13 | 3,110 | $202.89 | $630,987.9 |
| 2026-02-06 | 40 | $189.51 | $7,580.4 |
| 2026-02-05 | 1 | $193.61 | $193.61 |
| 2026-01-09 | 10 | $199.49 | $1,994.9 |
| 2025-12-24 | 2,943 | $178.87 | $526,414.41 |
| 2025-12-19 | 791 | $167.66 | $132,619.06 |
| 2025-12-15 | 37 | $170.07 | $6,292.59 |
| 2025-12-12 | 286 | $174.04 | $49,775.44 |
| 2025-12-11 | 407 | $170.09 | $69,226.63 |
| 2025-12-10 | 38 | $162.85 | $6,188.3 |
| 2025-12-02 | 2 | $174.26 | $348.52 |
| 2025-11-25 | 2,667 | $174.95 | $466,591.65 |
| 2025-11-14 | 910 | $166.59 | $151,596.9 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SARO | 0.522 | 0.561 | Moderate |
| AME | 0.509 | 0.510 | Moderate |
| MOD | 0.507 | 0.458 | Moderate |
| GE | 0.501 | 0.598 | Moderate |
| PH | 0.497 | 0.510 | Moderate |
| EMR | 0.496 | 0.613 | Moderate |
| WAB | 0.489 | 0.571 | Moderate |
| CW | 0.478 | 0.571 | Moderate |
| CMI | 0.473 | 0.479 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare VSEC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.