Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 18.9x earnings — a 42% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — KMB is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.3. DCF fair value of $82 implies 15% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of this consumer staples leader demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 12.3%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of equity, though recent revenue contraction of -2.1% signals potential headwinds in demand or pricing power. The DuPont decomposition reveals an unusually high ROE of 124.0%, driven primarily by substantial leverage with an equity multiplier of 10.49x rather than operational efficiency improvements, as asset turnover remains moderate at 0.96x while net margins hold steady at 12.3%. Credit and earnings quality metrics present a mixed picture; the Altman Z-Score of 3.3 suggests a safe distance from bankruptcy territory, yet the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects middling financial strength compared to top-tier peers, while the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.53 points toward low earnings manipulation risk despite the recent sales decline.
Valuation analysis indicates the current P/E ratio of 19.8x is priced at a premium relative to its implied growth trajectory, which the DCF model projects as nearly flat over the next decade with an FCF growth rate of -0.3%. This disconnect suggests the market may be pricing in defensive characteristics or brand moats not fully captured by cash flow assumptions, resulting in a calculated fair value of $125 and 29.5% upside potential if those underlying cash generation capabilities improve. The stock exhibits distinct factor tilts, showing positive exposure to both profitability (RMW: 0.177) and value factors (HML: 0.119), yet the annual Fama-French alpha of -4.38% highlights a historical underperformance relative to these risk-adjusted benchmarks over the measurement period.
Insider activity provides a counter-narrative to the recent revenue miss, with $723,487 in net buying observed over the last 90 days, suggesting management may view current valuations as attractive or anticipate operational stabilization. However, investors must weigh the strong capital returns and low manipulation risk against the significant leverage driving equity returns and the persistent negative alpha that has dragged performance below factor expectations recently. The convergence of high financial leverage with declining top-line growth creates a scenario where future ROE sustainability depends heavily on margin expansion rather than balance sheet optimization or volume recovery.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -2% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.3% | 9.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $94 | $67 | $44 |
| 3% | $125 | $82 | $51 |
| 4% | $187 | $107 | $61 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $97.49.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $82 (-14.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 6% below its 5-year average P/E of 21.4x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedKimberly-Clark Corporation is currently trading at $99.14, a price point that invites analysis of its position relative to moving average envelopes often used to gauge mean-reversion opportunities. In the absence of specific upper and lower band values or historical standard deviations for this security, determining whether the current level represents an extended deviation from the statistical norm requires additional data regarding recent volatility patterns. Typically, when a stock price sits near the outer boundaries of such envelopes after a sustained trend, it may signal increasing probability of a corrective move toward the mean, whereas proximity to the center suggests continued adherence to the prevailing momentum. Without concrete band thresholds or directional bias indicators, interpreting this specific snapshot as either an oversold condition ripe for rebound or an overbought state due for correction remains speculative based solely on the provided figure. The positioning within these theoretical boundaries would fundamentally alter how one views potential short-term price elasticity versus long-term trend integrity. If $99.14 were significantly detached from a calculated simple moving average, it might imply that market participants are pricing in temporary dislocations rather than fundamental shifts inherent to this consumer defensive sector. Conversely, alignment with central tendency metrics could indicate stability but also limits immediate upside potential without new catalysts. Ultimately, the technical narrative here hinges entirely on where $99.14 falls against a dynamic range of statistical averages that define normal versus abnormal valuation zones for this specific instrument at this precise moment in time.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | $1.2800 | +1.6% |
| 2025-12-05 | $1.2600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-05 | $1.2600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-06 | $1.2600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-07 | $1.2600 | +3.3% |
| 2024-12-06 | $1.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-06 | $1.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-07 | $1.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-07 | $1.2200 | +3.4% |
| 2023-12-07 | $1.1800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-07 | $1.1800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-08 | $1.1800 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLP or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KMB shares regardless of Kimberly-Clark Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to KMB through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Kimberly-Clark Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies WALMART INC (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with KMB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 38 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
KMB Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 4 KMB shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.1% of the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and 1.6% of the SDY (SDY). Across 40 tracked ETFs, approximately 80M shares (24.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.
ETFs with Highest KMB Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 40 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
KMB Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Kimberly-Clark Corporation over the past year sits near $98.06 (24% of 252-day volume). The current price of $97.49 sits 0.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (24% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
KMB Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Kimberly-Clark Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation converts 53% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 11.0% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 15,888 | $97.04 | $1.5M |
| 2026-05-13 | 8,271 | $97.34 | $805,099.14 |
| 2026-05-12 | 10,512 | $95.75 | $1.0M |
| 2026-05-11 | 807 | $98.31 | $79,336.17 |
| 2026-05-06 | 6,267 | $97.20 | $609,152.4 |
| 2026-04-28 | 2,565 | $98.25 | $252,011.25 |
| 2026-04-27 | 10,849 | $97.85 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-24 | 2,392 | $97.93 | $234,248.56 |
| 2026-04-22 | 41,904 | $96.60 | $4.0M |
| 2026-04-21 | 26,517 | $98.54 | $2.6M |
| 2026-04-20 | 34 | $98.84 | $3,360.56 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $97.16 | $291.48 |
| 2026-04-14 | 3,045 | $96.60 | $294,147 |
| 2026-04-06 | 50 | $96.13 | $4,806.5 |
| 2026-03-30 | 77 | $98.66 | $7,596.82 |
| 2026-03-25 | 33 | $98.92 | $3,264.36 |
| 2026-03-24 | 103 | $99.45 | $10,243.35 |
| 2026-03-23 | 2,405 | $98.20 | $236,171 |
| 2026-03-19 | 31,782 | $98.72 | $3.1M |
| 2026-03-17 | 6,652 | $100.26 | $666,929.52 |
| 2026-03-16 | 35,482 | $98.84 | $3.5M |
| 2026-03-12 | 12,124 | $100.04 | $1.2M |
| 2026-03-11 | 138,345 | $101.71 | $14.1M |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,128 | $102.85 | $116,014.8 |
| 2026-03-09 | 2 | $104.58 | $209.16 |
| 2026-03-06 | 12,937 | $104.91 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-05 | 313,586 | $104.73 | $32.8M |
| 2026-03-04 | 29,436 | $104.64 | $3.1M |
| 2026-03-03 | 30 | $109.74 | $3,292.2 |
| 2026-03-02 | 16,833 | $111.44 | $1.9M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CL | 0.545 | 0.508 | Moderate |
| PG | 0.518 | 0.433 | Moderate |
| CLX | 0.501 | 0.515 | Moderate |
| MDLZ | 0.445 | 0.452 | Moderate |
| KO | 0.430 | 0.389 | Moderate |
| GIS | 0.426 | 0.356 | Moderate |
| CHD | 0.425 | 0.342 | Moderate |
| KDP | 0.385 | 0.390 | Moderate |
| PEP | 0.378 | 0.357 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare KMB to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.