Consumer Defensive / Packaged Foods

The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC)

$23.33
-1.27%
$28.5B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
0.05
Beta
6.66%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.5 DistressBeneish M -3.06 CleanROIC−WACC -11.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.5. DCF fair value of $214 implies 854% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of The Kraft Heinz Company present a severe value trap characterized by negative capital allocation efficiency and deteriorating profitability. With an ROIC-WACC spread of -9.5%, the company is actively destroying shareholder value, exacerbated by a DuPont ROE decomposition revealing a net margin contraction to -23.4% despite modest asset turnover of 0.30x. Financial distress signals are amplified by an Altman Z-Score of 0.5 and a Piotroski F-Score of only 4/9, indicating weak balance sheet health and declining fundamentals. While the Beneish M-Score of -3.06 suggests management earnings may not be aggressively manipulated, the core issue remains the inability to generate returns above the cost of capital amidst revenue contraction.

Valuation metrics display a stark divergence between market pricing and discounted cash flow models, creating an ambiguous risk-reward profile. The stock trades at a significant premium relative to its sector average P/E of 34.4x given current operational losses, yet DCF analysis implies a fair value of $470 with theoretical upside exceeding 1987%. This extreme discrepancy stems from the model's assumption of negative free cash flow growth averaging -14.6% over ten years; if this trajectory holds, the implied valuation is mathematically unsustainable without a fundamental regime shift in profitability. The Fama-French alpha of -27.14% annually further confirms that risk-adjusted returns have been severely underwhelming relative to market factors.

Risk assessment highlights significant headwinds driven by insider activity and factor exposures. Over the past 90 days, insiders executed net selling totaling $344,078, a signal often correlated with management concerns regarding near-term prospects or valuation levels. While the stock exhibits neutral exposure to value (HML: 0.080), it lacks robust profitability characteristics despite an RMW factor score of 0.133, which appears inconsistent with reported negative margins and warrants scrutiny in model inputs. Investors must weigh whether current pricing reflects a temporary cyclical downturn or a structural inability to reverse the negative ROIC-WACC spread observed over recent periods.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$23.33
Fair Value
$218
Implied Upside
+834.2%
$218IMPLIED FAIR VALUEUNDERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)23%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)6.3%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
-8.0%annual FCF growth priced in at $23.33

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -4% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%6.3%8.3%
2%$181$165$106
3%$239$214$125
4%$357$304$153

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $23.33.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $214 (+854.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The Kraft Heinz Company is currently trading at $23.79 within the consumer defensive sector, presenting a market position that requires careful observation of its relationship with key moving averages to gauge trend direction. While specific average values are not provided in this snapshot, the immediate price level serves as a critical reference point for determining whether recent momentum aligns with longer-term trends or indicates potential divergence. In such scenarios, analysts typically monitor if the current trading floor sustains above these benchmarks, which would signal an uptrend, or falls below them, suggesting downward pressure. The Relative Strength Index often acts as a vital gauge for short-term velocity in this type of equity, though its specific reading is absent here to prevent misinterpretation without data points. Generally, when price action oscillates near support levels like $23.79, the RSI helps distinguish between healthy consolidation and exhausted momentum that might precede a reversal. Without knowing if the indicator sits in overbought or oversold territory, one can only infer that the stock's immediate trajectory depends on whether buyers are successfully defending this price zone against selling pressure. Ultimately, the technical landscape for KHC hinges on how $23.79 interacts with historical averages and volume profiles to define the prevailing trend. Investors must weigh these positional factors alongside broader market conditions in the consumer defensive space before forming a view on future price movement. The absence of definitive momentum signals in this brief overview suggests that further analysis is required to confirm whether the current setup

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.5
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.06
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

33.3%
Gross Margin
-23.4%
Net Margin
-4.9%
ROIC
6.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -11.2%— Negative spread.
-3.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-313.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
3.7B
Free Cash Flow
52%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-23.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.30x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.96x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-14.0%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.96x
Debt / Equity
1.15x
Current Ratio
-4.7x
Interest Coverage
8.32%
FCF Yield
-3.5B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-344,078
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-03ONELL CORYSold 3/8 qtrsSale$344,078
2026-02-27CAHILLANE STEVEN AGrant182,853 shares
2026-02-27PATRICIO MIGUELSold 1/8 qtrsGrant56,029 shares
2026-02-27AMAYA NICOLASGrant48,254 shares
2026-02-27TORRES FLAVIOGrant32,991 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.60
Act: $0.62
+3.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.64
Act: $0.69
+8.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.58
Act: $0.61
+5.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.61
Act: $0.67
+9.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.4000
Latest Dividend
$1.60
2025 Total
0.0%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.77
2016
$2.45
2017
$2.50
2018
$1.60
2019
$1.60
2020
$1.60
2021
$1.60
2022
$1.60
2023
$1.60
2024
$1.60
2025
$0.40
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-06$0.40000.0%
2025-11-28$0.40000.0%
2025-08-29$0.40000.0%
2025-05-30$0.40000.0%
2025-03-07$0.40000.0%
2024-11-29$0.40000.0%
2024-08-30$0.40000.0%
2024-06-06$0.40000.0%
2024-03-07$0.40000.0%
2023-11-30$0.40000.0%
2023-08-31$0.40000.0%
2023-06-05$0.40000.0%

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

25.5%
Annual Volatility
-0.87
Sharpe (1Y)
-26.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.30
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.188
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.080
Value (HML)
Neutral
+0.133
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.930
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -27.14%
R²: 16.0%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

11.4
Forward P/E
0.99
PEG Ratio
0.68
Price/Book
15M
Avg Volume
$29.19
52W High
$21.04
52W Low
28%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.8B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding KHC
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.6T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SPHD or XLP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KHC shares regardless of The Kraft Heinz Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to KHC through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in The Kraft Heinz Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

KHC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
KHCEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskPGLow Risk
KHC Price Drop (%)0

If The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KHC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

KHC Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 KHC shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
KHC
Total Shares
1.2B
ETF Lock-Up
13.6%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
13.6%Locked Float

The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.7% of the SPHD (SPHD) and 1.3% of the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 162M shares (13.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

KHC Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
KHC
PRICE
$23.33
FLOOR (POC)
$24.27
STRENGTH
Medium
$21$22$22$22$23$23$239%$23.33$2410%$2411%$24POC 11%$259%$256%$256%$26$26$26$27$27$27$28
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for The Kraft Heinz Company over the past year sits near $24.27 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $23.33 sits 3.9% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1471,523$23.18$1.7M
2026-05-1318$23.37$420.66
2026-05-1123,126$23.96$554,098.96
2026-05-0811,068$23.64$261,647.52
2026-05-07369,939$23.07$8.5M
2026-05-041$22.49$22.49
2026-05-01991$22.66$22,456.06
2026-04-293,781$22.47$84,959.07
2026-04-27300$21.94$6,582
2026-04-2013,135$22.47$295,143.45
2026-04-1723$22.59$519.57
2026-04-156$22.11$132.66
2026-04-0913$22.95$298.35
2026-04-0786$23.57$2,027.02
2026-04-06119$22.79$2,712.01
2026-04-011,252$22.49$28,157.48
2026-03-318,826$22.34$197,172.84
2026-03-271,065$21.56$22,961.4
2026-03-254,321$21.32$92,123.72
2026-03-2421,789$21.21$462,144.69
2026-03-23455$21.57$9,814.35
2026-03-204,986$21.76$108,495.36
2026-03-1326,817$22.33$598,823.61
2026-03-1114,233$23.66$336,752.78
2026-03-10448$24.44$10,949.12
2026-03-0935,968$24.54$882,654.72
2026-03-061,500$24.23$36,345
2026-03-02200$24.61$4,922
2026-02-2619,402$24.56$476,513.12
2026-02-23200$24.40$4,880

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
CPB0.6860.657Moderate
GIS0.6830.698Moderate
CAG0.6390.658Moderate
MDLZ0.5400.604Moderate
PEP0.5150.521Moderate
MKC0.4860.452Moderate
EQR0.4760.382Moderate
MAA0.4660.409Moderate
HRL0.4660.514Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare KHC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.