Realty Income Corporation (O)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicO trades at 50.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 47.4x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Realty Income Corporation reveal a capital allocation environment where returns on invested capital significantly lag the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -5.3%. Despite generating robust top-line growth at 9.1% annually and maintaining high gross margins near 92.5%, the DuPont decomposition shows that earnings power is driven almost entirely by leverage (Equity Multiplier of 1.81x) rather than operational efficiency or asset turnover, which remains low at 0.08x. This structural reliance on debt to achieve a modest ROE of 2.6% is underscored by an Altman Z-Score of 1.1, indicating elevated bankruptcy risk relative to historical norms, although the Beneish M-Score of -2.43 suggests earnings are not subject to significant manipulation and the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects a mixed but stable financial trajectory.
Valuation metrics present a distinct premium over sector peers, with a current P/E multiple of 53.2x compared to the industry average of 41.4x. This substantial discount implies that market participants are pricing in aggressive future growth expectations or specific income stability attributes not fully captured by standard multiples. The discrepancy between the high valuation and the negative capital efficiency spread suggests the market is compensating for perceived low volatility rather than superior fundamental value creation, as indicated by the neutral Profitability Factor (RMW) of 0.014 despite strong net margins.
Risk-adjusted performance metrics highlight a divergence from traditional factor models; the stock exhibits an annual Fama-French Alpha of 11.82%, suggesting it has outperformed its risk-adjusted benchmark significantly over the measured period, while simultaneously holding a Value Factor (HML) score of 0.336 that points to a value tilt inconsistent with its high multiple profile. With neutral insider flow recorded at zero dollars over the last ninety days, there is no immediate signal from management regarding capital deployment or confidence shifts. The combination of elevated distress risk metrics and strong alpha generation creates a complex risk-reward dynamic where downside protection may be offset by valuation sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 8% above its 5-year average P/E of 50.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedO, a real estate investment trust in the retail sector, is currently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages at $64.82, indicating an uptrend with positive momentum, while the Relative Strength Index of 53 suggests it's neither overbought nor oversold but leaning slightly bullish.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | $0.2710 | 0.0% |
| 2026-04-30 | $0.2710 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-31 | $0.2710 | +0.4% |
| 2026-02-27 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-31 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-01 | $0.2700 | +0.4% |
| 2025-09-02 | $0.2690 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-01 | $0.2690 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-01 | $0.2690 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
10-K Risk Factor Expansion
Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IYR or SCHH, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell O shares regardless of Realty Income Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $11.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to O through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Realty Income Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Realty Income Corporation (O) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with O. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
O Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 O shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Realty Income Corporation (O) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.4% of the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and 4.4% of the Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 187M shares (20.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.
ETFs with Highest O Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
O Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Realty Income Corporation over the past year sits near $55.84 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $59.91 trades 7.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 7,913 | $61.52 | $486,807.76 |
| 2026-05-11 | 135 | $61.92 | $8,359.2 |
| 2026-05-07 | 3,795 | $64.01 | $242,917.95 |
| 2026-05-06 | 59 | $63.57 | $3,750.63 |
| 2026-04-20 | 10,646 | $65.09 | $692,948.14 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1,690 | $63.96 | $108,092.4 |
| 2026-04-15 | 6 | $63.81 | $382.86 |
| 2026-04-06 | 244 | $62.21 | $15,179.24 |
| 2026-04-02 | 99 | $61.88 | $6,126.12 |
| 2026-03-25 | 91 | $60.46 | $5,501.86 |
| 2026-03-11 | 16,265 | $64.88 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-10 | 22,579 | $64.94 | $1.5M |
| 2026-03-09 | 16,265 | $65.00 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-06 | 3,800 | $64.80 | $246,240 |
| 2026-03-05 | 10,093 | $66.00 | $666,138 |
| 2026-03-04 | 182 | $66.56 | $12,113.92 |
| 2026-03-03 | 2,950 | $67.56 | $199,302 |
| 2026-03-02 | 2,961 | $67.00 | $198,387 |
| 2026-02-27 | 1,781 | $66.60 | $118,614.6 |
| 2026-02-26 | 449,094 | $65.99 | $29.6M |
| 2026-02-25 | 2,475 | $66.52 | $164,637 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,425 | $66.14 | $94,249.5 |
| 2026-02-11 | 3,685 | $63.90 | $235,471.5 |
| 2026-02-09 | 56 | $63.23 | $3,540.88 |
| 2026-02-03 | 99 | $60.53 | $5,992.47 |
| 2026-01-30 | 74 | $60.78 | $4,497.72 |
| 2026-01-29 | 149 | $60.07 | $8,950.43 |
| 2026-01-28 | 297,911 | $60.92 | $18.1M |
| 2026-01-22 | 6 | $61.79 | $370.74 |
| 2026-01-20 | 300 | $61.42 | $18,426 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ADC | 0.719 | 0.678 | High co-movement |
| WPC | 0.709 | 0.648 | High co-movement |
| VRTPX | 0.641 | 0.597 | Moderate |
| VICI | 0.589 | 0.492 | Moderate |
| PSA | 0.584 | 0.560 | Moderate |
| PNW | 0.540 | 0.504 | Moderate |
| REG | 0.533 | 0.518 | Moderate |
| EXR | 0.533 | 0.527 | Moderate |
| LNT | 0.524 | 0.566 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare O to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.