Real Estate / REIT - Retail

Realty Income Corporation (O)

$59.91
+0.60%
$57.1B
Market Cap
50.2
P/E Ratio
0.76
Beta
5.30%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 1.1 DistressBeneish M -2.43 CleanROIC−WACC -5.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

O trades at 50.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 47.4x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Realty Income Corporation reveal a capital allocation environment where returns on invested capital significantly lag the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -5.3%. Despite generating robust top-line growth at 9.1% annually and maintaining high gross margins near 92.5%, the DuPont decomposition shows that earnings power is driven almost entirely by leverage (Equity Multiplier of 1.81x) rather than operational efficiency or asset turnover, which remains low at 0.08x. This structural reliance on debt to achieve a modest ROE of 2.6% is underscored by an Altman Z-Score of 1.1, indicating elevated bankruptcy risk relative to historical norms, although the Beneish M-Score of -2.43 suggests earnings are not subject to significant manipulation and the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects a mixed but stable financial trajectory.

Valuation metrics present a distinct premium over sector peers, with a current P/E multiple of 53.2x compared to the industry average of 41.4x. This substantial discount implies that market participants are pricing in aggressive future growth expectations or specific income stability attributes not fully captured by standard multiples. The discrepancy between the high valuation and the negative capital efficiency spread suggests the market is compensating for perceived low volatility rather than superior fundamental value creation, as indicated by the neutral Profitability Factor (RMW) of 0.014 despite strong net margins.

Risk-adjusted performance metrics highlight a divergence from traditional factor models; the stock exhibits an annual Fama-French Alpha of 11.82%, suggesting it has outperformed its risk-adjusted benchmark significantly over the measured period, while simultaneously holding a Value Factor (HML) score of 0.336 that points to a value tilt inconsistent with its high multiple profile. With neutral insider flow recorded at zero dollars over the last ninety days, there is no immediate signal from management regarding capital deployment or confidence shifts. The combination of elevated distress risk metrics and strong alpha generation creates a complex risk-reward dynamic where downside protection may be offset by valuation sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

50.2x
O P/E
47.4x
Sector Avg
50.6x
5Y Avg P/E
+6%
vs Sector

Currently trading 8% above its 5-year average P/E of 50.6x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

O, a real estate investment trust in the retail sector, is currently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages at $64.82, indicating an uptrend with positive momentum, while the Relative Strength Index of 53 suggests it's neither overbought nor oversold but leaning slightly bullish.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.43
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

92.5%
Gross Margin
18.4%
Net Margin
2.6%
ROIC
8.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.4%— Negative spread.
+9.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+23.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

18.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.08x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.81x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
2.6%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.81x
Debt / Equity
1.42x
Current Ratio
2.0x
Interest Coverage
5.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.8B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.33
Act: $0.28
-15.0%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.22
-45.1%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.36
-10.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.33
-18.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.2710
Latest Dividend
$3.49
2025 Total
+21.5%
YoY Growth
2 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$2.81
2023
$2.87
2024
$3.49
2025
$1.35
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-29$0.27100.0%
2026-04-30$0.27100.0%
2026-03-31$0.2710+0.4%
2026-02-27$0.27000.0%
2026-01-30$0.27000.0%
2025-12-31$0.27000.0%
2025-11-28$0.27000.0%
2025-10-31$0.27000.0%
2025-10-01$0.2700+0.4%
2025-09-02$0.26900.0%
2025-08-01$0.26900.0%
2025-07-01$0.26900.0%
Stock Splits
2021-11-15: 1.032:12005-01-03: 2:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

16.8%
Annual Volatility
1.11
Sharpe (1Y)
-11.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.26
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.058
Size (SMB)
Neutral
+0.336
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.014
Profit (RMW)
Neutral
+0.397
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +11.82%
R²: 14.9%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

35.6
Forward P/E
5.68
PEG Ratio
1.46
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$67.94
52W High
$55.52
52W Low
35%
52W Range Position

10-K Risk Factor Expansion

Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.

+46.5%
YoY Change (20242025)
18,340
Latest Word Count
+56%
6-Year Total
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$11.4B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding O
0.17%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.6T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like IYR or SCHH, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell O shares regardless of Realty Income Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $11.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to O through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Realty Income Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

O Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
OEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFVRTPXUnknownWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskWELLLow RiskPLDMed Risk
O Price Drop (%)0

If Realty Income Corporation (O) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with O. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

O Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 O shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
O
Total Shares
932M
ETF Lock-Up
20.0%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
20.0%Locked Float

Realty Income Corporation (O) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.4% of the iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and 4.4% of the Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 187M shares (20.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.

Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

O Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
O
PRICE
$59.91
FLOOR (POC)
$55.84
STRENGTH
High
$54$54$5511%$56POC 15%$5710%$578%$586%$596%$60$60$59.91$61$62$62$63$64$65$65$66$67$68
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Realty Income Corporation over the past year sits near $55.84 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $59.91 trades 7.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-147,913$61.52$486,807.76
2026-05-11135$61.92$8,359.2
2026-05-073,795$64.01$242,917.95
2026-05-0659$63.57$3,750.63
2026-04-2010,646$65.09$692,948.14
2026-04-161,690$63.96$108,092.4
2026-04-156$63.81$382.86
2026-04-06244$62.21$15,179.24
2026-04-0299$61.88$6,126.12
2026-03-2591$60.46$5,501.86
2026-03-1116,265$64.88$1.1M
2026-03-1022,579$64.94$1.5M
2026-03-0916,265$65.00$1.1M
2026-03-063,800$64.80$246,240
2026-03-0510,093$66.00$666,138
2026-03-04182$66.56$12,113.92
2026-03-032,950$67.56$199,302
2026-03-022,961$67.00$198,387
2026-02-271,781$66.60$118,614.6
2026-02-26449,094$65.99$29.6M
2026-02-252,475$66.52$164,637
2026-02-231,425$66.14$94,249.5
2026-02-113,685$63.90$235,471.5
2026-02-0956$63.23$3,540.88
2026-02-0399$60.53$5,992.47
2026-01-3074$60.78$4,497.72
2026-01-29149$60.07$8,950.43
2026-01-28297,911$60.92$18.1M
2026-01-226$61.79$370.74
2026-01-20300$61.42$18,426

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

SEC Comment Letters

SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.

Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
ADC0.7190.678High co-movement
WPC0.7090.648High co-movement
VRTPX0.6410.597Moderate
VICI0.5890.492Moderate
PSA0.5840.560Moderate
PNW0.5400.504Moderate
REG0.5330.518Moderate
EXR0.5330.527Moderate
LNT0.5240.566Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare O to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.