Technology

Paychex, Inc. (PAYX)

$100.79
-1.61%
$34.7B
Market Cap
21.4
P/E Ratio
0.89
Beta
4.91%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 2.6 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.16 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC +9.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 21.4x earnings — a 67% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — PAYX is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 2.6. DCF fair value of $76 implies 15% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -2.16 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits a robust capital allocation profile, generating an ROIC of 18.8% against a WACC of 10.2%, resulting in an 8.6 percentage point spread that signals efficient value creation relative to the cost of equity and debt. This high return is primarily driven by exceptional net margins at 29.7%, supported by strong gross margin expansion to 72.4%, while asset turnover remains modest at 0.34x, indicating a leverage-heavy capital structure with an equity multiplier of 4.01x that boosts the DuPont ROE decomposition to 40.2%. Although the Piotroski F-Score sits in the middle range at 4/9 and the Altman Z-Score of 2.8 suggests moderate distress risk, a Beneish M-Score of -2.16 points toward low earnings manipulation potential, reinforcing the credibility of these profitability metrics despite slower revenue growth of just 5.6% year-over-year.

Valuation analysis reveals a significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow modeling. The current P/E ratio of 20.2x appears elevated when weighed against an implied long-term free cash flow growth rate of only 8.2%, leading to a DCF fair value calculation that suggests -26.1% downside relative to present prices. This compression implies the market is pricing in higher growth expectations than the model supports, or alternatively, that current multiples are unsustainable given the constrained expansion trajectory and lack of significant historical premium. The stock's factor exposures show a tilt toward value characteristics with an HML score of 0.293, yet this is counterbalanced by robust profitability signals (RMW: 0.105) and negative Fama-French alpha of -14.78% annually, suggesting underperformance relative to style benchmarks over the measured period.

Despite the fundamental disconnect between DCF valuations and current pricing, recent insider activity shows $197,258 in net buying over the last 90 days, which may indicate management confidence or opportunistic accumulation at these levels. However, investors must weigh this against the negative alpha drag and the fact that the low asset turnover limits scalability despite high margins. The data presents a classic value trap scenario where strong profitability metrics coexist with depressed growth rates and significant valuation discounts relative to intrinsic models, requiring careful assessment of whether current pricing reflects temporary market dislocation or structural limitations in future earnings power.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$100.79
Fair Value
$77
Implied Upside
-23.5%
$77IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)5%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)9.5%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
6.5%annual FCF growth priced in at $100.79

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 6% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.5%9.5%11.5%
2%$95$67$51
3%$114$76$56
4%$143$88$62

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $100.79.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $76 (-15.1%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

21.4x
PAYX P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
24.8x
5Y Avg P/E
-67%
vs Sector

Currently trading 24% below its 5-year average P/E of 24.8x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.6
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.16
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

72.4%
Gross Margin
29.7%
Net Margin
18.8%
ROIC
9.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +9.3%— Positive value creation spread.
+5.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-2.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.7B
Free Cash Flow
85%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

29.7%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.34x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
4.01x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
40.2%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

3.01x
Debt / Equity
1.28x
Current Ratio
21.6x
Interest Coverage
1.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.09%
FCF Yield
2.5B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$197,258
Net Buying
2
Buy Transactions
0
Sale Transactions
2026-03-03GOLISANO B THOMASOther$103,390
2026-02-04DOODY JOSEPH GSold 1/8 qtrsBuy$98,760
2026-02-04BONADIO THOMAS FBuy$98,498
2026-01-30GOLISANO B THOMASOther$3M
2026-01-23GOLISANO B THOMASOther$1M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $1.20
Act: $1.19
-0.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.20
Act: $1.22
+1.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.23
Act: $1.26
+2.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.67
Act: $1.71
+2.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$1.1900
Latest Dividend
$4.22
2025 Total
+10.2%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.92
2016
$1.92
2017
$2.18
2018
$2.42
2019
$2.48
2020
$2.60
2021
$3.03
2022
$3.46
2023
$3.83
2024
$4.22
2025
$2.27
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-13$1.1900+10.2%
2026-01-28$1.08000.0%
2025-11-07$1.08000.0%
2025-07-21$1.08000.0%
2025-05-12$1.0800+10.2%
2025-02-07$0.98000.0%
2024-11-07$0.98000.0%
2024-08-08$0.98000.0%
2024-05-09$0.9800+10.1%
2024-02-12$0.89000.0%
2023-11-13$0.89000.0%
2023-08-09$0.89000.0%
Stock Splits
2000-05-23: 1.5:11999-05-24: 1.5:11998-05-26: 1.5:11997-05-30: 1.5:11996-05-24: 1.5:11995-05-26: 1.5:11993-08-27: 1.5:11992-05-21: 1.5:11987-11-16: 1.5:11986-06-13: 1.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

23.4%
Annual Volatility
-1.92
Sharpe (1Y)
-0.26
Sharpe (3Y)
-45.0%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-45.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.69
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.102
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.293
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.105
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.038
Invest (CMA)
Neutral
Alpha (annual): -14.78%
R²: 22.9%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

16.4
Forward P/E
1.66
PEG Ratio
8.66
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$161.24
52W High
$85.45
52W Low
20%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$6.1B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PAYX
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.8T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SCHD or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PAYX shares regardless of Paychex, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to PAYX through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Paychex, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PAYX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PAYXEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFCVXLow RiskXOMLow RiskABBVMed RiskHDLow RiskKOLow Risk
PAYX Price Drop (%)0

If Paychex, Inc. (PAYX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Chevron Corp (CVX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PAYX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PAYX Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 PAYX shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
PAYX
Total Shares
358M
ETF Lock-Up
19.7%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
19.7%Locked Float

Paychex, Inc. (PAYX) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.1% of the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and 0.7% of the VOT (VOT). Across 35 tracked ETFs, approximately 71M shares (19.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 35 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PAYX Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
PAYX
PRICE
$100.79
FLOOR (POC)
$94.38
STRENGTH
High
$87$9115%$94POC 15%$986%$102$100.79$105$1099%$11210%$116$119$123$127$130$134$137$141$144$148$152$155
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Paychex, Inc. over the past year sits near $94.38 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $100.79 trades 6.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

PAYX Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Paychex, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.7B
EBITDA
$2.5B
FCF Conversion
69%
Reinvestment Rate
31%
69% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
18.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
9.2%

Paychex, Inc. converts 69% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 9.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-141,003$89.92$90,189.76
2026-05-08170,647$94.26$16.1M
2026-05-069,942$92.85$923,114.7
2026-05-056,193$92.48$572,728.64
2026-05-0113$92.63$1,204.19
2026-04-2969$90.99$6,278.31
2026-04-276$89.82$538.92
2026-04-21133$93.09$12,380.97
2026-04-201,000$91.96$91,960
2026-04-17141$92.13$12,990.33
2026-04-15227$88.85$20,168.95
2026-04-14411$89.32$36,710.52
2026-04-1311$85.57$941.27
2026-03-31918$93.12$85,484.16
2026-03-276,143$93.59$574,923.37
2026-03-2532$90.61$2,899.52
2026-03-2310,808$92.55$1.0M
2026-03-1910,420$90.64$944,468.8
2026-03-1852,741$92.43$4.9M
2026-03-174,392$93.10$408,895.2
2026-03-061,508$98.38$148,357.04
2026-03-05553$95.79$52,971.87
2026-03-029,926$93.65$929,569.9
2026-02-259,954$88.48$880,729.92
2026-02-2424$87.39$2,097.36
2026-02-181,071$93.27$99,892.17
2026-02-171,643$94.38$155,066.34
2026-02-1328$92.47$2,589.16
2026-02-123,787$94.84$359,159.08
2026-02-1128$99.03$2,772.84

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
ADP0.8360.847High co-movement
PAYC0.6550.660Moderate
ACN0.6210.705Moderate
TOST0.5720.652Moderate
ROP0.5550.580Moderate
MCO0.5450.531Moderate
GEN0.5250.643Moderate
WDAY0.5140.616Moderate
ICE0.5120.551Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare PAYX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.