Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicTexas Pacific Land Corporation's P/E of 53.8 is above its sector average (34.8x), though accompanied by a 21.5% economic spread (ROIC − WACC). Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 106.5. DCF fair value of $7 implies 98% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of Texas Pacific Land Corporation exhibits exceptional quality, evidenced by a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 21.8% and an Altman Z-Score of 135.8 that signals negligible bankruptcy risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 33.0% return on equity is primarily driven by operating leverage rather than financial leverage or asset intensity, as a high net margin of 60.3% compensates for moderate asset turnover of 0.49x and low equity multipliers near unity. This fundamental strength is corroborated by superior profitability metrics, including a Beneish M-Score of -2.34 indicating minimal earnings manipulation risk and strong value factor loadings consistent with robust long-term cash generation capabilities.
Despite these operational fundamentals, current market pricing appears significantly detached from intrinsic valuation models. The stock trades at 63.7x forward earnings, more than double the sector average of 31.4x, while a DCF analysis implies a fair value $7 lower than the current price, suggesting a theoretical downside of approximately 98.5%. This extreme premium appears to be priced in under an assumption of hyper-growth, requiring implied free cash flow expansion at unsustainable rates of 50% annually over the next decade to justify existing multiples. Consequently, any deviation from this aggressive growth trajectory could precipitate a severe multiple compression event.
Risk assessment highlights a divergence between fundamental alpha and recent insider sentiment. While the stock demonstrates substantial Fama-French alpha of 22.66% annually and carries positive exposure to profitability factors, there is notable net selling activity totaling $785,818 from insiders over the past ninety days. This insider outflow contrasts sharply with the company's pristine Piotroski score relative to its sector peers, introducing a behavioral risk component that warrants scrutiny alongside the valuation gap.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 13% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.6% | 9.6% | 11.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $8 | $6 | $6 |
| 3% | $9 | $7 | $6 |
| 4% | $11 | $8 | $6 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $370.82.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $7 (-98.3%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 49% above its 5-year average P/E of 39.4x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-02 | $0.6000 | +12.5% |
| 2025-12-01 | $0.5333 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-02 | $0.5333 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-02 | $0.5333 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-03 | $0.5333 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-02 | $0.5333 | +36.8% |
| 2024-09-03 | $0.3900 | -88.3% |
| 2024-07-01 | $3.3333 | +754.7% |
| 2024-06-03 | $0.3900 | +0.3% |
| 2024-02-29 | $0.3889 | +7.7% |
| 2023-11-30 | $0.3611 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or XLE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TPL shares regardless of Texas Pacific Land Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to TPL through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Texas Pacific Land Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies EXXON MOBIL CORP (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TPL. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TPL Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 TPL shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.9% of the XOP (XOP) and 1.3% of the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 11M shares (15.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest TPL Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TPL Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Texas Pacific Land Corporation over the past year sits near $303.63 (18% of 252-day volume). The current price of $370.82 trades 22.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (18% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
TPL Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Texas Pacific Land Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation converts 5% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 95% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 21.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 2,636 | $402.63 | $1.1M |
| 2026-05-11 | 2,050 | $394.20 | $808,110 |
| 2026-05-08 | 3,457 | $399.08 | $1.4M |
| 2026-04-28 | 443 | $436.90 | $193,546.7 |
| 2026-04-27 | 204 | $438.91 | $89,537.64 |
| 2026-04-23 | 4 | $439.50 | $1,758 |
| 2026-04-21 | 365 | $434.82 | $158,709.3 |
| 2026-04-20 | 8,017 | $422.58 | $3.4M |
| 2026-04-17 | 8,336 | $426.27 | $3.6M |
| 2026-04-16 | 170 | $417.30 | $70,941 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $416.77 | $416.77 |
| 2026-04-08 | 992 | $449.79 | $446,191.68 |
| 2026-04-02 | 84 | $439.20 | $36,892.8 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1 | $467.37 | $467.37 |
| 2026-03-25 | 6 | $535.26 | $3,211.56 |
| 2026-03-23 | 17 | $519.41 | $8,829.97 |
| 2026-03-16 | 408 | $531.13 | $216,701.04 |
| 2026-03-13 | 795 | $528.97 | $420,531.15 |
| 2026-03-11 | 26 | $520.76 | $13,539.76 |
| 2026-03-10 | 227 | $539.79 | $122,532.33 |
| 2026-03-06 | 63 | $523.31 | $32,968.53 |
| 2026-03-03 | 1,088 | $531.09 | $577,825.92 |
| 2026-03-02 | 23 | $524.29 | $12,058.67 |
| 2026-02-27 | 15,742 | $512.54 | $8.1M |
| 2026-02-26 | 636 | $510.30 | $324,550.8 |
| 2026-02-25 | 136 | $531.95 | $72,345.2 |
| 2026-02-24 | 242 | $502.85 | $121,689.7 |
| 2026-02-23 | 199 | $499.88 | $99,476.12 |
| 2026-02-20 | 280 | $486.56 | $136,236.8 |
| 2026-02-11 | 3,737 | $401.62 | $1.5M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| EOG | 0.487 | 0.457 | Moderate |
| FANG | 0.475 | 0.418 | Moderate |
| MUR | 0.461 | 0.418 | Moderate |
| OXY | 0.450 | 0.495 | Moderate |
| COP | 0.443 | 0.381 | Moderate |
| DVN | 0.433 | 0.358 | Moderate |
| APA | 0.415 | 0.414 | Moderate |
| CVX | 0.413 | 0.373 | Moderate |
| XOM | 0.411 | 0.349 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TPL to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.