Energy

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)

$370.82
+0.70%
$27.1B
Market Cap
53.8
P/E Ratio
0.68
Beta
0.61%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 106.5 SafeBeneish M -2.34 CleanROIC−WACC +21.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Texas Pacific Land Corporation's P/E of 53.8 is above its sector average (34.8x), though accompanied by a 21.5% economic spread (ROIC − WACC). Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 106.5. DCF fair value of $7 implies 98% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of Texas Pacific Land Corporation exhibits exceptional quality, evidenced by a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 21.8% and an Altman Z-Score of 135.8 that signals negligible bankruptcy risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 33.0% return on equity is primarily driven by operating leverage rather than financial leverage or asset intensity, as a high net margin of 60.3% compensates for moderate asset turnover of 0.49x and low equity multipliers near unity. This fundamental strength is corroborated by superior profitability metrics, including a Beneish M-Score of -2.34 indicating minimal earnings manipulation risk and strong value factor loadings consistent with robust long-term cash generation capabilities.

Despite these operational fundamentals, current market pricing appears significantly detached from intrinsic valuation models. The stock trades at 63.7x forward earnings, more than double the sector average of 31.4x, while a DCF analysis implies a fair value $7 lower than the current price, suggesting a theoretical downside of approximately 98.5%. This extreme premium appears to be priced in under an assumption of hyper-growth, requiring implied free cash flow expansion at unsustainable rates of 50% annually over the next decade to justify existing multiples. Consequently, any deviation from this aggressive growth trajectory could precipitate a severe multiple compression event.

Risk assessment highlights a divergence between fundamental alpha and recent insider sentiment. While the stock demonstrates substantial Fama-French alpha of 22.66% annually and carries positive exposure to profitability factors, there is notable net selling activity totaling $785,818 from insiders over the past ninety days. This insider outflow contrasts sharply with the company's pristine Piotroski score relative to its sector peers, introducing a behavioral risk component that warrants scrutiny alongside the valuation gap.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$370.82
Fair Value
$7
Implied Upside
-98.1%
$7IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)-3%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)9.6%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
50.0%annual FCF growth priced in at $370.82

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 13% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.6%9.6%11.6%
2%$8$6$6
3%$9$7$6
4%$11$8$6

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $370.82.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $7 (-98.3%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

53.8x
TPL P/E
34.8x
Sector Avg
39.4x
5Y Avg P/E
+55%
vs Sector

Currently trading 49% above its 5-year average P/E of 39.4x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
106.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.34
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

85.5%
Gross Margin
60.3%
Net Margin
31.1%
ROIC
9.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +21.5%— Positive value creation spread.
+13.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+6.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
32.1M
Free Cash Flow
460%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

60.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.49x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.11x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
33.0%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.11x
Debt / Equity
4.34x
Current Ratio
885.5x
Interest Coverage
-0.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.11%
FCF Yield
673.6M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-785,818
Net Selling
56
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-03-25HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C.Buy$538
2026-03-24HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C.Buy$535
2026-03-23HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C.Buy$529
2026-03-20HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C.Buy$534
2026-03-19HORIZON KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT L.L.C.Buy$527

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $1.92
Act: $1.76
-8.7%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $3.60
Act: $1.79
-50.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.6000
Latest Dividend
$2.13
2025 Total
-57.6%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.04
2004
$0.01
2006
$0.02
2007
$0.02
2008
$0.02
2009
$0.02
2010
$0.02
2011
$0.05
2012
$0.03
2014
$0.03
2015
$0.03
2016
$0.15
2017
$0.45
2018
$0.67
2019
$2.89
2020
$1.22
2021
$3.56
2022
$1.44
2023
$5.04
2024
$2.13
2025
$1.20
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-06-01$0.60000.0%
2026-03-02$0.6000+12.5%
2025-12-01$0.53330.0%
2025-09-02$0.53330.0%
2025-06-02$0.53330.0%
2025-03-03$0.53330.0%
2024-12-02$0.5333+36.8%
2024-09-03$0.3900-88.3%
2024-07-01$3.3333+754.7%
2024-06-03$0.3900+0.3%
2024-02-29$0.3889+7.7%
2023-11-30$0.36110.0%
Stock Splits
2025-12-23: 3:12024-03-27: 3:12007-07-13: 5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

46.4%
Annual Volatility
0.12
Sharpe (1Y)
0.69
Sharpe (3Y)
-52.2%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-52.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.24
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.246
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.616
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.217
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.335
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +22.66%
R²: 19.7%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

5.4
Forward P/E
7.33
PEG Ratio
17.42
Price/Book
474552
Avg Volume
$547.20
52W High
$269.23
52W Low
37%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$4.3B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TPL
0.07%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.6T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or XLE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TPL shares regardless of Texas Pacific Land Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to TPL through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Texas Pacific Land Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TPL Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TPLEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFXOMLow RiskXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow Risk
TPL Price Drop (%)0

If Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies EXXON MOBIL CORP (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TPL. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TPL Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 TPL shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TPL
Total Shares
69M
ETF Lock-Up
15.4%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
15.4%Locked Float

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.9% of the XOP (XOP) and 1.3% of the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 11M shares (15.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TPL Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TPL
PRICE
$370.82
FLOOR (POC)
$303.63
STRENGTH
High
$276$29011%$304POC 18%$31812%$3316%$3458%$359$373$370.82$387$401$415$429$442$456$470$484$498$512$5266%$540
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Texas Pacific Land Corporation over the past year sits near $303.63 (18% of 252-day volume). The current price of $370.82 trades 22.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (18% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

TPL Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Texas Pacific Land Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$32M
EBITDA
$674M
FCF Conversion
5%
Reinvestment Rate
95%
5% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
31.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
21.5%

Texas Pacific Land Corporation converts 5% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 95% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 21.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-122,636$402.63$1.1M
2026-05-112,050$394.20$808,110
2026-05-083,457$399.08$1.4M
2026-04-28443$436.90$193,546.7
2026-04-27204$438.91$89,537.64
2026-04-234$439.50$1,758
2026-04-21365$434.82$158,709.3
2026-04-208,017$422.58$3.4M
2026-04-178,336$426.27$3.6M
2026-04-16170$417.30$70,941
2026-04-141$416.77$416.77
2026-04-08992$449.79$446,191.68
2026-04-0284$439.20$36,892.8
2026-03-311$467.37$467.37
2026-03-256$535.26$3,211.56
2026-03-2317$519.41$8,829.97
2026-03-16408$531.13$216,701.04
2026-03-13795$528.97$420,531.15
2026-03-1126$520.76$13,539.76
2026-03-10227$539.79$122,532.33
2026-03-0663$523.31$32,968.53
2026-03-031,088$531.09$577,825.92
2026-03-0223$524.29$12,058.67
2026-02-2715,742$512.54$8.1M
2026-02-26636$510.30$324,550.8
2026-02-25136$531.95$72,345.2
2026-02-24242$502.85$121,689.7
2026-02-23199$499.88$99,476.12
2026-02-20280$486.56$136,236.8
2026-02-113,737$401.62$1.5M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
EOG0.4870.457Moderate
FANG0.4750.418Moderate
MUR0.4610.418Moderate
OXY0.4500.495Moderate
COP0.4430.381Moderate
DVN0.4330.358Moderate
APA0.4150.414Moderate
CVX0.4130.373Moderate
XOM0.4110.349Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TPL to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.