VISN (VISN)

$12.44
+1.39%
$2.8B
Market Cap
18.4
P/E Ratio
1.97
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 0.6 DistressBeneish M -1.25 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -9.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 0.6. DCF fair value of $12 implies 37% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.25 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and severely compromised capital efficiency. While revenue growth of 39.7% and an extraordinary net margin of 118.2% suggest dominant pricing power or non-recurring gains, the ROIC-WACC spread of -9.3% indicates that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital. This negative spread persists despite a high Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a benign Beneish M-Score of -1.25, which typically signal financial strength and low earnings manipulation risk; however, an Altman Z-Score of 0.6 raises immediate concerns regarding long-term solvency and potential distress that the high margins may be masking through leverage or one-time items. The DuPont components are not explicitly broken down here, but the negative ROIC spread implies that either asset turnover is insufficiently efficient to compensate for capital costs, or financial leverage is distorting returns without generating true economic profit.

Valuation metrics reflect a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from cash flow assumptions. The stock trades at 17.2x earnings, representing a massive 2023% premium over its five-year average of 0.8x and implying that the market is pricing in sustained high-growth trajectories far beyond historical norms. However, this optimism clashes directly with the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, which assigns a fair value $12 lower than current prices, translating to an implied downside of -37.0%. This valuation gap suggests the market may be overpaying for growth expectations that are not yet reflected in normalized cash flows or free cash flow conversion rates, particularly given the tension between reported profitability and negative capital returns.

The risk profile appears bifurcated: strong operational indicators like high margins and a low manipulation score contrast sharply with solvency risks highlighted by the Altman Z-Score and value-destructive ROIC dynamics. Without explicit Fama-French alpha data or insider trading activity provided in the dataset, the primary uncertainty lies in whether current earnings quality can sustainably support the elevated multiple without triggering balance sheet stress as measured by the distress score. The combination of a deeply negative capital spread and a valuation that implies near-doubling from historical norms creates an environment where realized returns could diverge significantly from expectations if margin compression or liquidity constraints materialize.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$12.44
Fair Value
$12
Implied Upside
-5.5%
$12IMPLIED FAIR VALUEFAIRLY VALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)24%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)9.6%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
17.0%annual FCF growth priced in at $12.44

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 40% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.6%9.6%11.6%
2%$21$8$0
3%$30$12$2
4%$44$18$6

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $12.44.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (-37.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
0.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.25
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

49.5%
Gross Margin
118.2%
Net Margin
0.3%
ROIC
9.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -9.3%— Negative spread.
+39.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+823.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
252.6M
Free Cash Flow
7%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

33.13x
Debt / Equity
3.88x
Current Ratio
21.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.34%
FCF Yield
308.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.07
Act: $0.14
+92.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.24
Act: $0.44
+85.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.62
+169.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.14
Act: $0.17
+221.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$10.0000
Latest Dividend
DateAmountChange
2026-04-28$10.0000

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

89.1%
Annual Volatility
1.91
Sharpe (1Y)
0.82
Sharpe (3Y)
-86.7%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-96.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

8.9
Forward P/E
2.94
PEG Ratio
0.61
Price/Book
7M
Avg Volume
$20.55
52W High
$5.42
52W Low
46%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$85M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding VISN
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$139B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XTL or VFMV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VISN shares regardless of VISN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $85M of passive capital is structurally linked to VISN through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VISN's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in VISN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

VISN Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
VISNEpicenterVGTETFVTWOETFVFMOETFIRDMHigh RiskCIENLow RiskVIAVHigh RiskEXTRHigh RiskVSATHigh Risk
VISN Price Drop (%)0

If VISN (VISN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC (IRDM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VISN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

VISN Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 29 VISN shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
VISN
Total Shares
226M
ETF Lock-Up
3.4%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
3.4%Locked Float

VISN (VISN) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.9% of the XTL (XTL) and 0.4% of the VFMV (VFMV). Across 6 tracked ETFs, approximately 8M shares (3.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

VISN Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
VISN
PRICE
$12.44
FLOOR (POC)
$17.90
STRENGTH
Medium
$6$7$7$87%$9$10$10$11$12$13$12.44$13$14$157%$1611%$1610%$177%$18POC 12%$199%$196%$20
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for VISN over the past year sits near $17.90 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $12.44 sits 30.5% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

VISN Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does VISN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$253M
EBITDA
$309M
FCF Conversion
82%
Reinvestment Rate
18%
82% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
0.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-9.3%

VISN converts 82% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1321,276$11.77$250,418.52
2026-05-0480$11.93$954.4
2026-04-2780$19.40$1,552
2026-04-213,656$19.11$69,866.16
2026-04-156,076$18.98$115,322.48
2026-04-1421,992$19.30$424,445.6
2026-04-0629,840$18.73$558,903.2
2026-04-01598$18.20$10,883.6
2026-03-23150$17.72$2,658
2026-03-1816$17.82$285.12
2026-03-0976,091$17.21$1.3M
2026-03-0250$17.57$878.5
2026-02-19224$18.91$4,235.84
2026-01-29183$18.79$3,438.57
2026-01-21159$18.01$2,863.59
2026-01-204,042$18.59$75,140.78

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
IDXX0.6580.068Moderate
WSM0.3760.411Moderate
VSAT0.3430.530Moderate
BEN0.3340.280Moderate
GS0.3230.485Moderate
FIBK0.3210.354Moderate
IR0.3150.320Moderate
NVDA0.3110.291Moderate
EXTR0.3100.357Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare VISN to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.