WFRD (WFRD)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.8. DCF fair value of $265 implies 155% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits a robust capital efficiency profile with an ROIC of 14.9%, though its equity returns are heavily leveraged; the DuPont decomposition reveals that a 3.06x equity multiplier is driving a 25.4% ROE, masking underlying operational constraints where revenue contracted by 10.8% year-over-year despite maintaining an 8.8% net margin and strong 31.2% gross margins. Quality metrics present a mixed signal: the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates solid financial health with few red flags, while the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.58 suggests earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, yet this fundamental stability contrasts sharply with declining top-line growth and insider activity showing $15.8 million in net selling over the last ninety days.
Valuation metrics display a significant divergence between current market pricing and discounted cash flow models; trading at 17.3x forward earnings, the stock appears priced below its DCF-derived fair value of $282, implying nearly double-digit upside if growth assumptions hold or leverage compresses. However, this valuation gap relies on an aggressive implied free cash flow growth rate of 10% annually over a decade, which stands in stark contrast to the observed revenue contraction and modest historical performance, suggesting the market may be pricing in a structural turnaround rather than organic expansion.
The risk-reward dynamic is complicated by conflicting data points: while low insider selling could indicate management confidence or liquidity needs, it simultaneously raises questions about private capital allocation priorities given the recent sales decline. The combination of high leverage driving returns against a backdrop of shrinking revenues creates an asymmetric profile where valuation support exists only if operational efficiency improves significantly to offset top-line headwinds without further eroding cash flows.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -11% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.8% | 8.8% | 10.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $337 | $230 | $172 |
| 3% | $417 | $265 | $191 |
| 4% | $553 | $313 | $214 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $103.72.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $265 (+155.3%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | $0.2750 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-06 | $0.2750 | +10.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-06 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-06 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-21 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-06 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-13 | $0.2500 | — |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XES or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WFRD shares regardless of WFRD's individual fundamentals. We estimate $564M of passive capital is structurally linked to WFRD through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on WFRD's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in WFRD to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If WFRD (WFRD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with WFRD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
WFRD Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 13 WFRD shares, reducing daily market volatility.
WFRD (WFRD) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.2% of the XES (XES) and 0.5% of the VFQY (VFQY). Across 15 tracked ETFs, approximately 6M shares (7.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest WFRD Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
WFRD Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for WFRD over the past year sits near $86.58 (9% of 252-day volume). The current price of $103.72 trades 19.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
WFRD Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does WFRD convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
WFRD converts 47% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 53% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 6.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 106 | $108.61 | $11,512.66 |
| 2026-05-01 | 21 | $110.35 | $2,317.35 |
| 2026-04-27 | 53 | $108.54 | $5,752.62 |
| 2026-04-24 | 48 | $102.93 | $4,940.64 |
| 2026-04-16 | 5 | $99.79 | $498.95 |
| 2026-04-15 | 75,271 | $99.62 | $7.5M |
| 2026-04-13 | 37,356 | $102.78 | $3.8M |
| 2026-04-07 | 9 | $94.90 | $854.1 |
| 2026-04-06 | 238 | $95.29 | $22,679.02 |
| 2026-03-31 | 275 | $92.62 | $25,470.5 |
| 2026-03-24 | 723 | $91.55 | $66,190.65 |
| 2026-03-23 | 6 | $86.14 | $516.84 |
| 2026-03-11 | 17 | $92.48 | $1,572.16 |
| 2026-03-05 | 197 | $95.80 | $18,872.6 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1 | $106.86 | $106.86 |
| 2026-02-12 | 10 | $103.62 | $1,036.2 |
| 2026-02-11 | 46,908 | $101.84 | $4.8M |
| 2026-02-10 | 61 | $104.25 | $6,359.25 |
| 2026-02-06 | 6 | $100.96 | $605.76 |
| 2026-02-03 | 115 | $92.39 | $10,624.85 |
| 2026-01-30 | 1,444 | $94.04 | $135,793.76 |
| 2026-01-28 | 446 | $93.26 | $41,593.96 |
| 2026-01-16 | 48 | $84.11 | $4,037.28 |
| 2026-01-12 | 7 | $89.24 | $624.68 |
| 2025-12-29 | 165 | $77.66 | $12,813.9 |
| 2025-12-22 | 598 | $78.83 | $47,140.34 |
| 2025-12-17 | 175 | $76.23 | $13,340.25 |
| 2025-12-12 | 18 | $81.21 | $1,461.78 |
| 2025-12-05 | 609 | $77.08 | $46,941.72 |
| 2025-12-02 | 580 | $76.71 | $44,491.8 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SLB | 0.776 | 0.747 | High co-movement |
| NOV | 0.690 | 0.622 | Moderate |
| HAL | 0.689 | 0.587 | Moderate |
| WHD | 0.669 | 0.579 | Moderate |
| HP | 0.650 | 0.564 | Moderate |
| PTEN | 0.634 | 0.467 | Moderate |
| BKR | 0.630 | 0.602 | Moderate |
| OII | 0.607 | 0.473 | Moderate |
| SDRL | 0.590 | 0.464 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare WFRD to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.