Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. vs BHP Group Limited
BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1.
🏆 Tale of the Tape
Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).
Rolling Correlation
Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.
Fundamentals
| Metric | CLF | BHP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.8B | $225.9B |
| P/E Ratio | — | 22.1x |
| Forward P/E | 31.0x | 16.7x |
| P/B | 1.33x | 4.48x |
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.99% |
| Beta | 2.01 | 0.80 |
Quantitative Metrics
| Metric | CLF | BHP |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Fair Value | — | $19.51 |
| DCF Upside | — | -75.0% |
| Piotroski F | 2/9 | 4/9 |
| Altman Z | 1.07 | 3.78 |
| Beneish M | -2.84 | -2.88 |
| FCF Yield | -8.28% | 4.57% |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | — | 0.3x |
| ROIC | -6.7% | 17.2% |
| WACC | 9.2% | 9.2% |
| ROIC – WACC | -15.8pp | 7.9pp |
| Gross Margin | -4.6% | 71.7% |
| Net Margin | -7.9% | 17.6% |
| Rev Growth YoY | -3.0% | -7.9% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 0.52 | 2.01 |
| Max Drawdown 3Y | -74.5% | -37.2% |
| FCF Payout Ratio | — | 69% |
CLF Price
BHP Price
ETF Exposure
More Comparisons
Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.
CLF vs BHP: Head-to-Head Analysis
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BHP leads 8–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.
In terms of capital efficiency, CLF generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -6.7% compared to BHP's 17.2%. This suggests BHP is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.
The 252-day rolling correlation between CLF and BHP is 0.418, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.
CLF appears in 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while BHP appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock is the better investment, CLF or BHP?
Our quantitative analysis compares CLF and BHP across nine fundamental dimensions. BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.
Are CLF and BHP correlated?
The 252-day correlation between CLF and BHP is 0.418. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.
How is the Tale of the Tape scored?
The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.