Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 8.3x earnings — a 87% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — FIS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 0.1. DCF fair value of $116 implies 149% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Fidelity National Information Services reveal a significant divergence between capital efficiency and profitability metrics. Despite generating modest revenue growth of 5.4% supported by healthy gross margins near 37%, the company's return on invested capital stands at just 4.8%, falling sharply below its weighted average cost of capital of 8.8%. This negative spread indicates that recent investments are failing to generate value above their financing costs, a conclusion reinforced by an ROE decomposition showing low asset turnover driving returns down despite moderate leverage and net margins around 3.6%. While the Beneish M-Score suggests earnings quality is unlikely to be manipulated at -2.71, the Altman Z-Score of 0.2 signals elevated financial distress risk that warrants close monitoring alongside a middling Piotroski F-Score of 5/9.
Valuation metrics present a complex picture where current multiples appear stretched relative to intrinsic value models but remain competitive within the sector context. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 63.4x, exceeding the technology sector average of 57.8x, which implies aggressive market expectations for future performance not yet reflected in earnings. However, discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $111 with an implied upside of 136.8%, contingent on achieving long-term free cash flow growth rates near 5.1% over the next decade. This disparity between current pricing and model-derived valuation highlights that the market is currently discounting the stock heavily, potentially due to concerns regarding capital allocation efficiency rather than a consensus view on long-term earnings power.
Risk-adjusted performance data further complicates the investment thesis through significant factor-based underperformance. The annual Fama-French alpha of -47.42% indicates substantial value destruction relative to risk-free benchmarks over the measured period, even though the stock exhibits a slight tilt toward the value factor with an HML score of 0.173 and neutral exposure to profitability factors. While insider activity shows net buying totaling $1.06 million over the last ninety days, suggesting some confidence from management or major holders, this positive signal must be weighed against the deteriorating capital efficiency metrics and high distress risk indicators that define the company's current operational trajectory.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 5% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.6% | 8.6% | 10.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $151 | $99 | $71 |
| 3% | $192 | $116 | $79 |
| 4% | $265 | $140 | $91 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $42.52.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $116 (+149.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 39% below its 5-year average P/E of 97.4x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at $43.62 presents a specific technical context regarding its trajectory relative to moving averages and short-term momentum indicators. Without explicit data on the position of the stock against its key moving averages or precise RSI readings in the provided input, any definitive statement about whether the price is trading above or below these benchmarks remains speculative based solely on the current figure. However, analyzing the sector classification as Technology alongside the specific valuation point suggests that market participants are monitoring this equity for signs of trend confirmation. The absence of raw momentum data means the Relative Strength Index cannot be evaluated to determine if short-term buying pressure is intensifying or waning at this exact moment. In a broader technical synthesis, the $43.62 level serves as an anchor point from which traders might assess potential support or resistance zones once comparative average data becomes available. The intersection of sector dynamics and current pricing implies that future price action will depend heavily on whether subsequent trading sessions establish a consistent direction relative to established moving averages. If the stock were to sustain positions above these longer-term benchmarks, it could indicate an underlying uptrend, whereas sustained movement below them might signal bearish momentum within the technology space. Ultimately, the technical picture relies on filling gaps in the provided dataset regarding average crossovers and oscillator levels to form a complete narrative of market sentiment.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | $0.4400 | +10.0% |
| 2025-12-09 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-10 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-10 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-11 | $0.4000 | +11.1% |
| 2024-12-09 | $0.3600 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-10 | $0.3600 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-10 | $0.3600 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-07 | $0.3600 | -30.8% |
| 2023-12-07 | $0.5200 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-07 | $0.5200 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-08 | $0.5200 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VOE or XLF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FIS shares regardless of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to FIS through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B (BRK.B) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FIS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
FIS Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 FIS shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.4% of the VOE (VOE) and 0.3% of the State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Across 27 tracked ETFs, approximately 76M shares (14.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest FIS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
FIS Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. over the past year sits near $66.16 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $42.52 sits 35.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
FIS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. converts 53% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 1,567 | $42.60 | $66,754.2 |
| 2026-04-16 | 5 | $48.32 | $241.6 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $46.98 | $140.94 |
| 2026-04-10 | 120,038 | $45.29 | $5.4M |
| 2026-04-09 | 136,720 | $47.01 | $6.4M |
| 2026-04-08 | 136,199 | $46.21 | $6.3M |
| 2026-03-25 | 6,902 | $49.14 | $339,164.28 |
| 2026-03-24 | 1,204 | $49.77 | $59,923.08 |
| 2026-03-23 | 35 | $49.79 | $1,742.65 |
| 2026-03-19 | 1,085 | $49.21 | $53,392.85 |
| 2026-03-18 | 163 | $50.23 | $8,187.49 |
| 2026-03-11 | 460 | $50.53 | $23,243.8 |
| 2026-03-10 | 649 | $51.62 | $33,501.38 |
| 2026-02-13 | 845 | $46.95 | $39,672.75 |
| 2026-02-05 | 11 | $51.57 | $567.27 |
| 2026-02-04 | 11 | $50.94 | $560.34 |
| 2026-01-23 | 17 | $61.30 | $1,042.1 |
| 2026-01-20 | 54 | $63.35 | $3,420.9 |
| 2026-01-16 | 3,203 | $63.45 | $203,230.35 |
| 2025-12-22 | 18,567 | $66.05 | $1.2M |
| 2025-12-19 | 18,304 | $65.90 | $1.2M |
| 2025-12-18 | 18,351 | $66.30 | $1.2M |
| 2025-12-05 | 72 | $65.56 | $4,720.32 |
| 2025-12-03 | 114 | $66.80 | $7,615.2 |
| 2025-12-02 | 3 | $66.20 | $198.6 |
| 2025-11-28 | 1,444 | $65.38 | $94,408.72 |
| 2025-11-26 | 7 | $65.65 | $459.55 |
| 2025-11-24 | 1,219 | $64.07 | $78,101.33 |
| 2025-11-21 | 150 | $62.38 | $9,357 |
| 2025-11-20 | 33 | $62.66 | $2,067.78 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ADP | 0.575 | 0.696 | Moderate |
| ACN | 0.540 | 0.620 | Moderate |
| ADBE | 0.514 | 0.636 | Moderate |
| MCO | 0.513 | 0.564 | Moderate |
| PYPL | 0.508 | 0.550 | Moderate |
| NDAQ | 0.505 | 0.628 | Moderate |
| PAYX | 0.499 | 0.627 | Moderate |
| GEN | 0.499 | 0.601 | Moderate |
| TOST | 0.494 | 0.586 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare FIS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.