Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - General

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)

$115.65
+0.42%
$293.2B
Market Cap
33.4
P/E Ratio
0.20
Beta
2.86%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 4.0 SafeBeneish M -2.27 CleanROIC−WACC +8.9%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 33.4x earnings — a 49% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — MRK is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 4.0. DCF fair value of $97 implies 19% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Merck & Co. reveal a capital allocation profile characterized by robust efficiency, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of +10.1%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of capital. This strong value creation is underpinned primarily by exceptional profitability rather than asset intensity or leverage; the DuPont decomposition shows net margins at 28.1% driving a 34.7% ROE, while asset turnover remains modest at 0.47x and equity multipliers sit at 2.60x. However, qualitative risk metrics present a mixed picture: while the Altman Z-Score of 3.9 suggests manageable bankruptcy risk and the Beneish M-Score of -2.27 indicates low earnings manipulation probability, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals potential weakness in financial strength or operating efficiency trends. This divergence between high profitability metrics and a mediocre fundamental score warrants scrutiny regarding the sustainability of current operations amidst stagnant revenue growth of just 1.3% year-over-year.

Valuation analysis highlights a significant discount relative to sector peers, with the stock trading at 16.6x earnings compared to a healthcare sector average of 30.8x. This compression aligns with discounted cash flow models projecting a fair value of $139 and an implied free cash flow growth rate of only 4.8% over the next decade. The market appears to be pricing in limited expansion potential, creating a scenario where the current multiple may offer margin for error if profitability remains stable but fails to accelerate. Despite the attractive valuation gap relative to historical norms and peer groups, the low implied growth assumption suggests that significant upside is contingent on a re-rating of future cash flow expectations rather than immediate earnings surprise.

Risk-adjusted performance data introduces complexity to the investment thesis; notably, the stock has generated an annual Fama-French alpha of 20.81%, suggesting outperformance relative to traditional factor models over recent periods. However, this apparent strength is counterbalanced by a negative Value Factor exposure of -0.136 and neutral Profitability Factor returns of -0.022, indicating the asset may be misaligned with classic value or quality premia strategies. Furthermore, insider activity data reveals $40.69 million in net selling over the last 90 days, a signal that management holders are reducing their positions despite the company's strong capital efficiency metrics. Investors must weigh the attractive fundamental spread and valuation discount against these divergent signals regarding growth trajectory and internal sentiment before forming a final conclusion on risk exposure.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$115.65
Fair Value
$94
Implied Upside
-18.7%
$94IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)2%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)7.5%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
9.0%annual FCF growth priced in at $115.65

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.5%9.5%
2%$114$80$56
3%$149$97$63
4%$221$123$74

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $115.65.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $97 (-19.3%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

33.4x
MRK P/E
65.2x
Sector Avg
19.6x
5Y Avg P/E
-49%
vs Sector

Currently trading 15% below its 5-year average P/E of 19.6x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

Merck's stock is currently trading slightly above its 50-day moving average but well above the longer-term 200-day moving average, suggesting near-term support. The RSI reading of 43 indicates that momentum may be neutral to bearish at this point, as it falls below the midpoint of 50 but remains within a range where neither overbought nor oversold conditions are present.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
4.0
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.27
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

74.8%
Gross Margin
28.1%
Net Margin
16.3%
ROIC
7.4%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +8.9%— Positive value creation spread.
+1.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+6.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
12.4B
Free Cash Flow
66%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

28.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.47x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.60x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
34.7%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

1.60x
Debt / Equity
1.54x
Current Ratio
16.5x
Interest Coverage
1.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.72%
FCF Yield
28.3B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$41M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
12
Sale Transactions
2026-02-12GUINDO CHIRFISold 1/8 qtrsSale$1M
2026-02-10LI DEAN YSold 1/8 qtrsSale$1M
2026-02-09GUINDO CHIRFISold 1/8 qtrsSale$1M
2026-02-09ZACHARY JENNIFER LSold 1/8 qtrsSale$14M
2026-02-09ZACHARY JENNIFER LSold 1/8 qtrsGrant$14M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $2.14
Act: $2.22
+4.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.03
Act: $2.13
+5.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.35
Act: $2.58
+9.9%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $2.01
Act: $2.04
+1.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.8500
Latest Dividend
$3.28
2025 Total
+5.1%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.33
2016
$1.80
2017
$1.90
2018
$2.16
2019
$2.37
2020
$2.61
2021
$2.80
2022
$2.96
2023
$3.12
2024
$3.28
2025
$0.85
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-16$0.85000.0%
2025-12-15$0.8500+4.9%
2025-09-15$0.81000.0%
2025-06-16$0.81000.0%
2025-03-17$0.81000.0%
2024-12-16$0.8100+5.2%
2024-09-16$0.77000.0%
2024-06-17$0.77000.0%
2024-03-14$0.77000.0%
2023-12-14$0.7700+5.5%
2023-09-14$0.73000.0%
2023-06-14$0.73000.0%
Stock Splits
2021-06-03: 1.048:11999-02-17: 2:11992-05-26: 3:11988-05-26: 3:11986-05-27: 2:11972-06-01: 2:11964-05-27: 3:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

28.7%
Annual Volatility
1.43
Sharpe (1Y)
-22.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.43
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.270
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
-0.136
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
-0.022
Profit (RMW)
Neutral
+1.410
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +20.81%
R²: 23.3%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

12.4
Forward P/E
5.58
PEG Ratio
6.39
Price/Book
10M
Avg Volume
$125.14
52W High
$75.40
52W Low
81%
52W Range Position

10-K Risk Factor Expansion

Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.

+3.9%
YoY Change (20242025)
11,443
Latest Word Count
+8%
6-Year Total
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Smart Money Flow

Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.

FundQuarterShares Change% ChangeAction
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q1-1,800-47.4%Decreased
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q1-32,100-8.1%Decreased
Citadel Advisors2026-Q1-1,400-18.4%Decreased
Bridgewater Associates2026-Q1-25,777-100.0%Exited
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q1-1,248,312-99.9%Decreased
DE Shaw2026-Q1-106,821-12.9%Decreased
Millennium Management2026-Q1+67,134+520.4%Increased
Citadel Advisors2025-Q4-1,200-13.6%Decreased
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q4-722,700-64.5%Decreased
DE Shaw2025-Q4+133,580+19.2%Increased
Bridgewater Associates2025-Q4-36,290-58.5%Decreased
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q4+149,771+13.6%Increased

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$37.3B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding MRK
0.50%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$7.4T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLV or IYH, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MRK shares regardless of Merck & Co., Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $37.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to MRK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Merck & Co., Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MRK Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MRKEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFJNJLow RiskLLYLow RiskLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskLLYLow Risk
MRK Price Drop (%)0

If Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with MRK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 43 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MRK Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 MRK shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
MRK
Total Shares
2.5B
ETF Lock-Up
14.5%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
14.5%Locked Float

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 5.4% of the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and 5.0% of the IYH (IYH). Across 44 tracked ETFs, approximately 357M shares (14.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 44 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MRK Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
MRK
PRICE
$115.65
FLOOR (POC)
$79.78
STRENGTH
High
$75$7712%$80POC 12%$8212%$856%$88$90$93$95$98$101$103$106$108$111$113$116$115.65$119$1216%$124
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Merck & Co., Inc. over the past year sits near $79.78 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $115.65 trades 45.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

MRK Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Merck & Co., Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$12.4B
EBITDA
$28.3B
FCF Conversion
44%
Reinvestment Rate
56%
44% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
16.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
8.9%

Merck & Co., Inc. converts 44% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 56% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 8.9% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-123,277$111.28$364,664.56
2026-05-0819,323$112.30$2.2M
2026-05-042$112.16$224.32
2026-04-24183$114.62$20,975.46
2026-04-23193$112.89$21,787.77
2026-04-221,234$112.56$138,899.04
2026-04-211,367$117.10$160,075.7
2026-04-203,143$119.07$374,237.01
2026-04-168,618$117.90$1.0M
2026-04-1521$119.96$2,519.16
2026-04-134,427$121.42$537,526.34
2026-04-07200$120.85$24,170
2026-04-06365$120.87$44,117.55
2026-04-02179$120.84$21,630.36
2026-04-01147$120.29$17,682.63
2026-03-27889$118.93$105,728.77
2026-03-26789$119.37$94,182.93
2026-03-25148$116.37$17,222.76
2026-03-23192,159$114.18$21.9M
2026-03-18159$115.87$18,423.33
2026-03-17952$115.43$109,889.36
2026-03-164,900$115.61$566,489
2026-03-05169$120.28$20,327.32
2026-03-0310,725$121.41$1.3M
2026-03-022,742$123.82$339,514.44
2026-02-2617$122.46$2,081.82
2026-02-2351,458$122.26$6.3M
2026-02-1922$121.66$2,676.52
2026-02-13178$119.24$21,224.72
2026-02-117$117.15$820.05

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)

Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.

FundQuarterSharesValue ($K)
DE Shaw2026-Q1723,653$125,517,613K
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q1365,500$63,395,975K
Millennium Management2026-Q180,034$13,881,897K
Citadel Advisors2026-Q16,200$1,075,390K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q12,000$346,900K
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q11,600$277,520K
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q41,249,912$231,883,674K
DE Shaw2025-Q4830,474$154,069,536K
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q4397,600$73,762,752K
Bridgewater Associates2025-Q425,777$4,782,149K
Millennium Management2025-Q412,900$2,393,208K
Citadel Advisors2025-Q47,600$1,409,952K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2025-Q43,800$704,976K
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q31,120,300$225,774,059K
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q31,100,141$221,711,416K

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.

SEC Comment Letters

SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.

Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
PFE0.6570.469Moderate
BMY0.6240.452Moderate
AZN0.5890.423Moderate
DHR0.5710.352Moderate
AMGN0.5680.458Moderate
A0.5590.426Moderate
ABBV0.5280.339Moderate
TMO0.5240.235Moderate
WAT0.5010.425Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare MRK to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.