Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 33.4x earnings — a 49% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — MRK is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 4.0. DCF fair value of $97 implies 19% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Merck & Co. reveal a capital allocation profile characterized by robust efficiency, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of +10.1%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of capital. This strong value creation is underpinned primarily by exceptional profitability rather than asset intensity or leverage; the DuPont decomposition shows net margins at 28.1% driving a 34.7% ROE, while asset turnover remains modest at 0.47x and equity multipliers sit at 2.60x. However, qualitative risk metrics present a mixed picture: while the Altman Z-Score of 3.9 suggests manageable bankruptcy risk and the Beneish M-Score of -2.27 indicates low earnings manipulation probability, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals potential weakness in financial strength or operating efficiency trends. This divergence between high profitability metrics and a mediocre fundamental score warrants scrutiny regarding the sustainability of current operations amidst stagnant revenue growth of just 1.3% year-over-year.
Valuation analysis highlights a significant discount relative to sector peers, with the stock trading at 16.6x earnings compared to a healthcare sector average of 30.8x. This compression aligns with discounted cash flow models projecting a fair value of $139 and an implied free cash flow growth rate of only 4.8% over the next decade. The market appears to be pricing in limited expansion potential, creating a scenario where the current multiple may offer margin for error if profitability remains stable but fails to accelerate. Despite the attractive valuation gap relative to historical norms and peer groups, the low implied growth assumption suggests that significant upside is contingent on a re-rating of future cash flow expectations rather than immediate earnings surprise.
Risk-adjusted performance data introduces complexity to the investment thesis; notably, the stock has generated an annual Fama-French alpha of 20.81%, suggesting outperformance relative to traditional factor models over recent periods. However, this apparent strength is counterbalanced by a negative Value Factor exposure of -0.136 and neutral Profitability Factor returns of -0.022, indicating the asset may be misaligned with classic value or quality premia strategies. Furthermore, insider activity data reveals $40.69 million in net selling over the last 90 days, a signal that management holders are reducing their positions despite the company's strong capital efficiency metrics. Investors must weigh the attractive fundamental spread and valuation discount against these divergent signals regarding growth trajectory and internal sentiment before forming a final conclusion on risk exposure.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $114 | $80 | $56 |
| 3% | $149 | $97 | $63 |
| 4% | $221 | $123 | $74 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $115.65.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $97 (-19.3%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 15% below its 5-year average P/E of 19.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedMerck's stock is currently trading slightly above its 50-day moving average but well above the longer-term 200-day moving average, suggesting near-term support. The RSI reading of 43 indicates that momentum may be neutral to bearish at this point, as it falls below the midpoint of 50 but remains within a range where neither overbought nor oversold conditions are present.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-16 | $0.8500 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-15 | $0.8500 | +4.9% |
| 2025-09-15 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-16 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-17 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-16 | $0.8100 | +5.2% |
| 2024-09-16 | $0.7700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-17 | $0.7700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-14 | $0.7700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-14 | $0.7700 | +5.5% |
| 2023-09-14 | $0.7300 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-14 | $0.7300 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
10-K Risk Factor Expansion
Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.
Smart Money Flow
Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares Change | % Change | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | -1,800 | -47.4% | Decreased |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-Q1 | -32,100 | -8.1% | Decreased |
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | -1,400 | -18.4% | Decreased |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-Q1 | -25,777 | -100.0% | Exited |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | -1,248,312 | -99.9% | Decreased |
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | -106,821 | -12.9% | Decreased |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | +67,134 | +520.4% | Increased |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | -1,200 | -13.6% | Decreased |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2025-Q4 | -722,700 | -64.5% | Decreased |
| DE Shaw | 2025-Q4 | +133,580 | +19.2% | Increased |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2025-Q4 | -36,290 | -58.5% | Decreased |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2025-Q4 | +149,771 | +13.6% | Increased |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLV or IYH, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MRK shares regardless of Merck & Co., Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $37.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to MRK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Merck & Co., Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with MRK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 43 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MRK Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 MRK shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 5.4% of the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and 5.0% of the IYH (IYH). Across 44 tracked ETFs, approximately 357M shares (14.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest MRK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 44 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MRK Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Merck & Co., Inc. over the past year sits near $79.78 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $115.65 trades 45.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
MRK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Merck & Co., Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Merck & Co., Inc. converts 44% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 56% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 8.9% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 3,277 | $111.28 | $364,664.56 |
| 2026-05-08 | 19,323 | $112.30 | $2.2M |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $112.16 | $224.32 |
| 2026-04-24 | 183 | $114.62 | $20,975.46 |
| 2026-04-23 | 193 | $112.89 | $21,787.77 |
| 2026-04-22 | 1,234 | $112.56 | $138,899.04 |
| 2026-04-21 | 1,367 | $117.10 | $160,075.7 |
| 2026-04-20 | 3,143 | $119.07 | $374,237.01 |
| 2026-04-16 | 8,618 | $117.90 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-15 | 21 | $119.96 | $2,519.16 |
| 2026-04-13 | 4,427 | $121.42 | $537,526.34 |
| 2026-04-07 | 200 | $120.85 | $24,170 |
| 2026-04-06 | 365 | $120.87 | $44,117.55 |
| 2026-04-02 | 179 | $120.84 | $21,630.36 |
| 2026-04-01 | 147 | $120.29 | $17,682.63 |
| 2026-03-27 | 889 | $118.93 | $105,728.77 |
| 2026-03-26 | 789 | $119.37 | $94,182.93 |
| 2026-03-25 | 148 | $116.37 | $17,222.76 |
| 2026-03-23 | 192,159 | $114.18 | $21.9M |
| 2026-03-18 | 159 | $115.87 | $18,423.33 |
| 2026-03-17 | 952 | $115.43 | $109,889.36 |
| 2026-03-16 | 4,900 | $115.61 | $566,489 |
| 2026-03-05 | 169 | $120.28 | $20,327.32 |
| 2026-03-03 | 10,725 | $121.41 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-02 | 2,742 | $123.82 | $339,514.44 |
| 2026-02-26 | 17 | $122.46 | $2,081.82 |
| 2026-02-23 | 51,458 | $122.26 | $6.3M |
| 2026-02-19 | 22 | $121.66 | $2,676.52 |
| 2026-02-13 | 178 | $119.24 | $21,224.72 |
| 2026-02-11 | 7 | $117.15 | $820.05 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)
Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares | Value ($K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | 723,653 | $125,517,613K |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-Q1 | 365,500 | $63,395,975K |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | 80,034 | $13,881,897K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | 6,200 | $1,075,390K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | 2,000 | $346,900K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | 1,600 | $277,520K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2025-Q4 | 1,249,912 | $231,883,674K |
| DE Shaw | 2025-Q4 | 830,474 | $154,069,536K |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2025-Q4 | 397,600 | $73,762,752K |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2025-Q4 | 25,777 | $4,782,149K |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q4 | 12,900 | $2,393,208K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | 7,600 | $1,409,952K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2025-Q4 | 3,800 | $704,976K |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2025-Q3 | 1,120,300 | $225,774,059K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2025-Q3 | 1,100,141 | $221,711,416K |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| PFE | 0.657 | 0.469 | Moderate |
| BMY | 0.624 | 0.452 | Moderate |
| AZN | 0.589 | 0.423 | Moderate |
| DHR | 0.571 | 0.352 | Moderate |
| AMGN | 0.568 | 0.458 | Moderate |
| A | 0.559 | 0.426 | Moderate |
| ABBV | 0.528 | 0.339 | Moderate |
| TMO | 0.524 | 0.235 | Moderate |
| WAT | 0.501 | 0.425 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare MRK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.