Alcoa Corporation (AA)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 19.9x earnings — a 46% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — AA is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.3. DCF fair value of $43 implies 41% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAlcoa Corporation demonstrates a capital allocation profile where the 18.7% return on equity is driven primarily by financial leverage rather than operational efficiency, as evidenced by an equity multiplier of 2.60x supporting a net margin of only 9.0%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests reasonable fundamental stability and the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.39 indicates low earnings manipulation risk, the underlying ROIC spread of just 7.8% reveals that returns on invested capital are modest relative to typical high-quality compounders. This structural reliance on leverage amplifies equity returns but simultaneously exposes shareholders to heightened sensitivity in asset-heavy commodity cycles, creating a divergence between reported profitability and true economic value generation.
Valuation metrics present a significant discount compared to peer benchmarks, with the current P/E of 16.4x trading substantially below the sector average of 36.1x. However, this compression is not necessarily a mispricing opportunity; rather, it aligns closely with the DCF fair value estimate of $42, which implies a negative upside of -36.5% from current levels. The market appears to be pricing in a starkly different growth trajectory than the 10-year implied free cash flow growth rate of 21.9%, suggesting that consensus expectations have already factored in potential margin compression or capital expenditure overhangs typical for basic materials producers. Consequently, the valuation gap between historical multiples and intrinsic value calculations indicates that current prices reflect a conservative view of future cash flow generation rather than an undervalued asset.
The absence of insider activity, marked by neutral flows over the last 90 days, further dampens immediate sentiment signals in what is otherwise a low-alpha environment absent specific risk factor deltas or Fama-French alpha data provided for synthesis.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 8% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.9% | 13.9% | 15.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $51 | $40 | $33 |
| 3% | $55 | $43 | $35 |
| 4% | $61 | $47 | $38 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $83.79.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $43 (-40.7%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 42% above its 5-year average P/E of 11.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedAlcoa Corporation is currently trading at $71.38 within the Basic Materials sector, presenting a snapshot of its market positioning relative to broader trend indicators. The immediate technical picture suggests that price action and momentum are key factors for observers to monitor closely as the stock navigates recent volatility. Without specific moving average data points or Relative Strength Index values provided in this instance, a definitive conclusion regarding whether the asset is firmly above long-term support levels or exhibiting overbought conditions cannot be drawn from the limited information available. In the absence of explicit trend line placements or oscillator readings, any assessment of short-term strength remains speculative rather than empirical. Technical analysts typically look for prices sustaining positions above key moving averages to confirm an uptrend, while RSI metrics would clarify if momentum is accelerating toward exhaustion or gaining fresh traction. Since these specific parameters are not included in the current dataset, it is impossible to determine if the $71.38 level represents a breakout point, a consolidation zone, or a potential reversal area based solely on this summary. Market participants must rely on additional data points such as historical average prices and momentum oscillators to form a complete technical thesis regarding Alcoa's trajectory. The current price alone does not reveal the underlying strength of the trend or the immediate probability of continuation versus correction. Further analysis incorporating volume profiles, support resistance zones, and comparative sector performance would be necessary to construct a robust view on whether the stock is technically aligned with bullish momentum or facing significant headwinds in
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-19 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-12 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-20 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-04 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-10-29 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-12 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-20 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-04 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-10-30 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-07 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XME or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AA shares regardless of Alcoa Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to AA through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Alcoa Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Alcoa Corporation (AA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AA Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 AA shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Alcoa Corporation (AA) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.3% of the XME (XME) and 1.0% of the MDYV (MDYV). Across 16 tracked ETFs, approximately 29M shares (11.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest AA Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
AA Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Alcoa Corporation over the past year sits near $30.04 (18% of 252-day volume). The current price of $83.79 trades 178.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (18% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
AA Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Alcoa Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Alcoa Corporation converts 31% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 69% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 241 | $65.34 | $15,746.94 |
| 2026-05-11 | 36 | $63.18 | $2,274.48 |
| 2026-05-05 | 5,404 | $62.46 | $337,533.84 |
| 2026-05-01 | 651 | $63.79 | $41,527.29 |
| 2026-04-27 | 424 | $66.01 | $27,988.24 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,274 | $65.62 | $149,219.88 |
| 2026-04-17 | 274 | $70.41 | $19,292.34 |
| 2026-04-16 | 97,959 | $70.38 | $6.9M |
| 2026-04-15 | 50,000 | $71.84 | $3.6M |
| 2026-04-13 | 5,493 | $73.03 | $401,153.79 |
| 2026-04-10 | 49,845 | $73.27 | $3.7M |
| 2026-04-09 | 75,888 | $71.76 | $5.4M |
| 2026-04-08 | 575 | $72.96 | $41,952 |
| 2026-04-06 | 11,200 | $71.53 | $801,136 |
| 2026-03-16 | 2,391 | $63.59 | $152,043.69 |
| 2026-03-12 | 1,567 | $66.36 | $103,986.12 |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,388 | $61.16 | $84,890.08 |
| 2026-03-09 | 209 | $59.65 | $12,466.85 |
| 2026-03-05 | 1,900,000 | $61.55 | $116.9M |
| 2026-03-03 | 2,978 | $64.08 | $190,830.24 |
| 2026-03-02 | 2,296 | $62.08 | $142,535.68 |
| 2026-02-25 | 107 | $61.41 | $6,570.87 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,833 | $60.49 | $110,878.17 |
| 2026-02-18 | 38,996 | $57.47 | $2.2M |
| 2026-02-17 | 7,500 | $59.95 | $449,625 |
| 2026-02-11 | 1,731 | $61.76 | $106,906.56 |
| 2026-02-10 | 199 | $62.36 | $12,409.64 |
| 2026-02-02 | 135 | $56.81 | $7,669.35 |
| 2026-01-26 | 1,311 | $62.21 | $81,557.31 |
| 2026-01-20 | 12,277 | $60.07 | $737,479.39 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CENX | 0.597 | 0.650 | Moderate |
| FCX | 0.550 | 0.618 | Moderate |
| RIO | 0.524 | 0.536 | Moderate |
| BHP | 0.467 | 0.462 | Moderate |
| STT | 0.464 | 0.474 | Moderate |
| CMC | 0.446 | 0.424 | Moderate |
| CMI | 0.445 | 0.393 | Moderate |
| GS | 0.431 | 0.428 | Moderate |
| STLD | 0.427 | 0.409 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare AA to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.