Rio Tinto Group (RIO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 17.5x earnings — a 52% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — RIO is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 3.0. DCF fair value of $29 implies 71% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of RIO demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread, underpinned by an ROE of 14.9% driven primarily by high profitability rather than operational velocity or leverage. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the return is anchored in a substantial net margin of 17.3%, which benefits from gross margins exceeding 57%, while asset turnover remains modest at 0.45x and equity multipliers sit near 2x. This earnings quality profile, however, registers only a moderate Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, suggesting that despite strong current profitability, the balance sheet or cash flow dynamics may lack recent stability compared to top-tier financials. The revenue growth trajectory of 7.4% YoY indicates steady expansion but does not yet signal an acceleration phase typical of high-growth equities.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at a P/E multiple of 15.5x, the stock appears compressed relative to its implied growth potential if the DCF model's assumptions regarding 10-year free cash flow expansion hold true. The central valuation algorithm assigns a fair value of $29 based on these parameters, which implies that current market prices are pricing in significantly lower growth expectations or carry higher risk premiums than the discounted cash flow analysis suggests. This creates an upside gap of -69.2% relative to the calculated fair value, indicating that the market may be discounting future prospects more aggressively than the underlying fundamentals justify under standard modeling assumptions.
Insider activity over the preceding 90 days remains neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear signal regarding management's confidence in near-term execution or capital deployment strategies. The combination of moderate financial strength scores and a valuation that appears detached from fundamental growth proxies suggests an asymmetric risk-reward profile where downside protection may be limited if macro conditions deteriorate, yet upside potential exists if the market re-rates its assumptions on long-term cash flow generation. Investors must weigh whether the current discount reflects legitimate concerns about execution or represents a mispricing opportunity relative to the company's margin durability and capital efficiency.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 7% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.3% | 8.3% | 10.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $39 | $24 | $16 |
| 3% | $51 | $29 | $19 |
| 4% | $74 | $36 | $22 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $111.67.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $29 (-70.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 50% above its 5-year average P/E of 10.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | $2.5400 | +71.6% |
| 2025-08-15 | $1.4800 | -34.2% |
| 2025-03-07 | $2.2500 | +27.1% |
| 2024-08-16 | $1.7700 | -31.4% |
| 2024-03-07 | $2.5800 | +45.8% |
| 2023-08-10 | $1.7700 | -21.3% |
| 2023-03-09 | $2.2500 | -15.7% |
| 2022-08-11 | $2.6700 | -44.3% |
| 2022-03-10 | $4.7900 | -14.6% |
| 2021-08-12 | $5.6100 | +39.6% |
| 2021-03-04 | $4.0200 | +159.4% |
| 2020-08-06 | $1.5500 | -32.9% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like LIT or VGK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RIO shares regardless of Rio Tinto Group's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.9B of passive capital is structurally linked to RIO through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Rio Tinto Group to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Rio Tinto Group (RIO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Samsung SDI Co Ltd (006400.KS) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RIO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RIO Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 90 RIO shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Rio Tinto Group (RIO) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 20.2% of the LIT (LIT) and 0.7% of the VGK (VGK). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 14M shares (1.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest RIO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RIO Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Rio Tinto Group over the past year sits near $57.33 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $111.67 trades 94.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
RIO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Rio Tinto Group convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Rio Tinto Group converts 20% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 80% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 2,721 | $112.04 | $304,860.84 |
| 2026-05-13 | 2,330 | $109.50 | $255,135 |
| 2026-05-01 | 490 | $100.48 | $49,235.2 |
| 2026-04-30 | 13 | $96.49 | $1,254.37 |
| 2026-04-29 | 13 | $98.49 | $1,280.37 |
| 2026-04-27 | 900 | $99.61 | $89,649 |
| 2026-04-22 | 1 | $97.72 | $97.72 |
| 2026-04-20 | 19,900 | $100.15 | $2.0M |
| 2026-04-17 | 1,244 | $99.71 | $124,039.24 |
| 2026-04-14 | 53,588 | $99.20 | $5.3M |
| 2026-04-13 | 417 | $98.26 | $40,974.42 |
| 2026-04-09 | 251,729 | $98.45 | $24.8M |
| 2026-04-07 | 8 | $94.01 | $752.08 |
| 2026-04-01 | 21 | $93.29 | $1,959.09 |
| 2026-03-31 | 388 | $88.82 | $34,462.16 |
| 2026-03-27 | 11,389 | $85.79 | $977,062.31 |
| 2026-03-26 | 11,389 | $87.54 | $996,993.06 |
| 2026-03-25 | 11,389 | $86.77 | $988,223.53 |
| 2026-03-24 | 2,279 | $85.84 | $195,629.36 |
| 2026-03-23 | 532 | $83.15 | $44,235.8 |
| 2026-03-17 | 16,385 | $89.86 | $1.5M |
| 2026-03-13 | 93,858 | $90.70 | $8.5M |
| 2026-03-12 | 5,541 | $92.08 | $510,215.28 |
| 2026-03-11 | 100 | $91.68 | $9,168 |
| 2026-03-06 | 32,083 | $93.37 | $3.0M |
| 2026-03-05 | 373 | $96.25 | $35,901.25 |
| 2026-03-02 | 3,195 | $99.34 | $317,391.3 |
| 2026-02-27 | 5 | $99.09 | $495.45 |
| 2026-02-26 | 30,000 | $100.78 | $3.0M |
| 2026-02-24 | 300 | $97.67 | $29,301 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| BHP | 0.860 | 0.867 | High co-movement |
| FCX | 0.629 | 0.744 | Moderate |
| AA | 0.524 | 0.536 | Moderate |
| SQM | 0.520 | 0.516 | Moderate |
| ALB | 0.497 | 0.534 | Moderate |
| NEM | 0.481 | 0.612 | Moderate |
| RGLD | 0.478 | 0.599 | Moderate |
| GB00BL6K5J42 | 0.473 | 0.616 | Moderate |
| STLD | 0.460 | 0.573 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare RIO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.