Johnson Controls International plc (JCI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicJCI trades at 41.0x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 44.7x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a significant headwind, with an ROIC of 6.4% falling sharply below the estimated WACC of 12.4%, resulting in a negative spread that erodes intrinsic value over time. Despite this inefficiency, equity returns are artificially inflated by high leverage rather than operational prowess; the DuPont decomposition reveals that while net margins at 14.0% and asset turnover at 0.62x remain stable, the majority of the 25.4% ROE is driven by an equity multiplier of 2.93x. Fundamental quality indicators show a mixed picture: the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial strength with recent improvements in profitability or leverage ratios, while the Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places the firm in the "grey zone" regarding bankruptcy risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.28 indicates low earnings manipulation risks, and gross margins holding steady at 36.4% provide a floor for operating stability despite sluggish revenue growth of just 2.8% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics reflect aggressive market expectations that appear misaligned with current capital return dynamics. The stock trades at a premium P/E ratio of 44.6x, significantly diverging from typical valuations for firms generating negative ROIC-WACC spreads. This pricing implies an embedded assumption of future FCF growth averaging 34.4% over the next decade to justify the multiple; however, historical revenue expansion has been tepid at 2.8%, suggesting the market is pricing in a substantial operational turnaround or asset-light transformation that current fundamentals do not yet support. The discrepancy between the high implied growth rate and low recent top-line velocity creates a vulnerability if earnings expectations fail to materialize rapidly.
Risk-reward dynamics are further complicated by divergent factor exposures and insider behavior. The stock exhibits strong momentum characteristics with an annual Fama-French Alpha of 13.85%, driven largely by its value tilt (HML: 0.170), yet it lacks a distinct profitability premium given the neutral RMW score of 0.068. This alpha generation may be temporary if the underlying ROIC deterioration persists, as negative capital spreads typically compress multiples over time regardless of short-term momentum. Compounding this uncertainty is notable insider activity, with $318,016 in net selling recorded over the last ninety days, which often signals management caution regarding near-term visibility or valuation levels relative to private liquidity costs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 207% above its 5-year average P/E of 15.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedJohnson Controls International plc is currently trading at $138.36 within the Industrials sector, presenting a snapshot where price action must be weighed against underlying risk dynamics rather than isolated metrics alone. The absence of specific drawdown or volatility figures in the provided dataset prevents a granular assessment of recent momentum stability; however, the existence of these variables implies that any upward movement at this level carries an inherent fragility dependent on market breadth and sector-specific headwinds. Without explicit data confirming whether current trends are supported by robust capital inflows or merely temporary liquidity shifts, the structural integrity of the price remains ambiguous. The fundamental backdrop for industrial equities often involves cyclical sensitivity to global demand, which acts as a silent counterweight to technical patterns. In this context, the $138.36 level serves less as an inflection point and more as a stress test zone where investor sentiment regarding economic recovery could either validate or erode existing positions rapidly. The interplay between potential hidden drawdown risks and prevailing volatility suggests that momentum here is likely reactive rather than proactive, meaning price appreciation may be susceptible to sudden reversals if macroeconomic indicators tighten. Ultimately, the technical setup reflects a state of equilibrium where risk dynamics are as significant as nominal gains. Observers must scrutinize whether the current valuation at $138.36 represents a consolidation phase built on solid fundamentals or a precarious accumulation driven by short-term speculation. The lack of definitive volatility metrics underscores the need for caution
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-16 | $0.4000 | +8.1% |
| 2025-06-23 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-24 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-23 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-25 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-24 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-22 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-15 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-22 | $0.3700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-16 | $0.3700 | +2.8% |
| 2023-03-17 | $0.3600 | +2.9% |
| 2022-12-16 | $0.3500 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or XLI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell JCI shares regardless of Johnson Controls International plc's individual fundamentals. We estimate $9.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to JCI through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Johnson Controls International plc to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with JCI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 23 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
JCI Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 JCI shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.6% of the XHB (XHB) and 1.6% of the State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI). Across 23 tracked ETFs, approximately 67M shares (11.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest JCI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 23 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
JCI Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Johnson Controls International plc over the past year sits near $104.56 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $141.99 trades 35.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
JCI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Johnson Controls International plc convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Johnson Controls International plc converts 32% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 68% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 9 | $143.80 | $1,294.2 |
| 2026-05-08 | 5,441 | $139.25 | $757,659.25 |
| 2026-05-05 | 1,607 | $144.40 | $232,050.8 |
| 2026-04-16 | 11 | $137.21 | $1,509.31 |
| 2026-04-15 | 4 | $142.05 | $568.2 |
| 2026-04-13 | 838 | $142.53 | $119,440.14 |
| 2026-03-25 | 61 | $136.43 | $8,322.23 |
| 2026-03-23 | 303 | $129.70 | $39,299.1 |
| 2026-03-17 | 32 | $131.69 | $4,214.08 |
| 2026-03-16 | 165,608 | $130.16 | $21.6M |
| 2026-02-25 | 24 | $144.71 | $3,473.04 |
| 2026-02-19 | 124,987 | $139.48 | $17.4M |
| 2026-02-17 | 110,212 | $139.24 | $15.3M |
| 2026-02-06 | 81,939 | $132.52 | $10.9M |
| 2026-02-05 | 81,987 | $129.49 | $10.6M |
| 2026-01-21 | 80 | $114.56 | $9,164.8 |
| 2025-12-31 | 177,398 | $120.94 | $21.5M |
| 2025-12-22 | 325 | $119.53 | $38,847.25 |
| 2025-12-19 | 343 | $117.74 | $40,384.82 |
| 2025-12-18 | 4,830 | $116.38 | $562,115.4 |
| 2025-12-15 | 12,158 | $114.76 | $1.4M |
| 2025-12-10 | 43,299 | $115.77 | $5.0M |
| 2025-12-05 | 6,337 | $114.20 | $723,685.4 |
| 2025-11-21 | 21 | $112.99 | $2,372.79 |
| 2025-11-17 | 4,575 | $118.72 | $543,144 |
| 2025-11-12 | 420 | $121.94 | $51,214.8 |
| 2025-11-10 | 5,328 | $122.25 | $651,348 |
| 2025-11-07 | 36,887 | $122.25 | $4.5M |
| 2025-11-04 | 67,158 | $113.18 | $7.6M |
| 2025-10-29 | 9,080 | $112.21 | $1.0M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| TT | 0.646 | 0.720 | Moderate |
| ETN | 0.599 | 0.573 | Moderate |
| CAT | 0.576 | 0.573 | Moderate |
| CARR | 0.574 | 0.501 | Moderate |
| MOD | 0.554 | 0.632 | Moderate |
| PH | 0.552 | 0.516 | Moderate |
| PWR | 0.548 | 0.562 | Moderate |
| WAB | 0.537 | 0.526 | Moderate |
| MPWR | 0.526 | 0.516 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare JCI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.