Linde plc (LIN)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicLIN trades at 33.0x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 36.7x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.0. DCF fair value of $96 implies 81% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedLinde plc exhibits a capital allocation profile with a modest 1.0% ROIC-WACC spread, suggesting that while the firm generates returns above its cost of capital, the economic moat is not exceptionally wide relative to peers. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this 17.4% return on equity is primarily driven by robust net margins at 20.3%, supported by a moderate equity multiplier of 2.18x rather than aggressive leverage or rapid asset turnover. Financial health indicators present a mixed picture; the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates average fundamental strength, while an Altman Z-Score of 3.9 places the company in the safe zone for bankruptcy risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.62 signals low earnings manipulation risk, reinforcing confidence in the reported profitability metrics despite sluggish revenue growth of just 3.0% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics suggest significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from cash flow modeling. Trading at a forward P/E multiple of 34.4x, LIN trades below its sector average of 41.0x, implying the market assigns a lower growth premium than typical for basic materials peers. However, this relative discount appears severe when compared to discounted cash flow analysis, which calculates a fair value $96 and implies an -80.7% downside from current levels. This stark discrepancy indicates that while investors are not pricing in hyper-growth, the DCF model assumes highly optimistic long-term free cash flow expansion at 18.0% annually over ten years to justify such high multiples; any deviation from this aggressive growth trajectory would materially compress valuation.
Risk-adjusted performance data highlights a disconnect between quality factors and recent price action relative to style benchmarks. Although the stock demonstrates strong profitability characteristics with an RMW factor score of 0.206, it has underperformed value strategies significantly, evidenced by a Fama-French alpha of -3.79% annually and only marginal value exposure at 0.183 HML. This poor risk-adjusted return coincides with substantial insider activity, where $10.25 million in net selling over the last ninety days suggests internal stakeholders may perceive current valuations as elevated relative to future cash flow potential. The combination of high implied growth assumptions required for DCF parity and active insider distribution warrants a cautious assessment of whether the market has fully priced in structural headwinds or if these metrics reflect temporary dislocation.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 3% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.3% | 9.3% | 11.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $125 | $83 | $59 |
| 3% | $154 | $96 | $66 |
| 4% | $201 | $114 | $76 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $495.91.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $96 (-81.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 2% above its 5-year average P/E of 33.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedLinde plc is currently trading at $507.92 within the Basic Materials sector, presenting a snapshot of its recent market behavior through specific technical lenses. The immediate analysis focuses on the relationship between price action and moving averages to gauge trend direction, alongside Relative Strength Index readings that illuminate short-term momentum dynamics. Without access to the precise values of the 50-day or 200-day moving averages in this dataset, a definitive statement regarding whether the stock is technically above or below these key support levels cannot be made from the provided text alone; however, the current price point serves as the anchor for such an evaluation if those thresholds were visible. Similarly, while the RSI metric typically ranges between 30 and 70 to indicate neutral conditions, oscillating near extremes suggests potential overbought or oversold states depending on its specific reading here, which remains unspecified in the input data. Consequently, any assessment of whether short-term momentum is accelerating upward or losing steam requires correlating an unlisted RSI value with the price's position relative to its historical averages. If the stock were trading above these moving averages alongside a rising RSI, it would historically signal bullish strength, whereas a breach below those lines combined with diverging RSI readings might imply weakening momentum. The current figure of $507.92 provides the necessary baseline for traders to overlay their own technical overlays and determine if the asset is exhibiting characteristics of an established uptrend or entering a corrective phase
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | $1.6000 | +6.7% |
| 2025-12-03 | $1.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-04 | $1.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-04 | $1.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-13 | $1.5000 | +7.9% |
| 2024-12-03 | $1.3900 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-04 | $1.3900 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-04 | $1.3900 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-13 | $1.3900 | +9.0% |
| 2023-12-01 | $1.2750 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-01 | $1.2750 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-01 | $1.2750 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
10-K Risk Factor Expansion
Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IYM or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell LIN shares regardless of Linde plc's individual fundamentals. We estimate $22.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to LIN through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Linde plc to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Linde plc (LIN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Newmont Corp (NEM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with LIN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 20 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
LIN Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 10 LIN shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Linde plc (LIN) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 19.9% of the IYM (IYM) and 15.0% of the VAW (VAW). Across 19 tracked ETFs, approximately 47M shares (10.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest LIN Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 19 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
LIN Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Linde plc over the past year sits near $463.99 (10% of 252-day volume). The current price of $495.91 trades 6.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
LIN Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Linde plc convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Linde plc converts 39% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 61% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 7,496 | $501.87 | $3.8M |
| 2026-05-01 | 10 | $501.14 | $5,011.4 |
| 2026-04-24 | 434 | $508.06 | $220,498.04 |
| 2026-04-17 | 4 | $499.22 | $1,996.88 |
| 2026-04-16 | 132 | $497.94 | $65,728.08 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $499.65 | $1,498.95 |
| 2026-04-14 | 537 | $508.87 | $273,263.19 |
| 2026-04-09 | 1,572 | $500.48 | $786,754.56 |
| 2026-04-08 | 4,164 | $494.59 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-07 | 7,669 | $499.47 | $3.8M |
| 2026-04-06 | 12,760 | $502.60 | $6.4M |
| 2026-04-02 | 2,935 | $493.83 | $1.4M |
| 2026-04-01 | 4,700 | $495.76 | $2.3M |
| 2026-03-30 | 25 | $491.12 | $12,278 |
| 2026-03-27 | 335 | $495.49 | $165,989.15 |
| 2026-03-25 | 47 | $479.84 | $22,552.48 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1,975 | $488.15 | $964,096.25 |
| 2026-03-16 | 843 | $493.92 | $416,374.56 |
| 2026-02-26 | 2,046 | $508.27 | $1.0M |
| 2026-02-25 | 2,046 | $504.00 | $1.0M |
| 2026-02-23 | 14,727 | $496.51 | $7.3M |
| 2026-02-19 | 10 | $485.28 | $4,852.8 |
| 2026-02-13 | 2,982 | $472.86 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-09 | 14 | $448.24 | $6,275.36 |
| 2026-01-30 | 7,635 | $455.00 | $3.5M |
| 2026-01-26 | 10 | $451.57 | $4,515.7 |
| 2026-01-21 | 18,471 | $433.15 | $8.0M |
| 2026-01-20 | 14,240 | $438.96 | $6.3M |
| 2026-01-16 | 26 | $440.04 | $11,441.04 |
| 2026-01-15 | 2,390 | $439.98 | $1.1M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| VRTPX | 0.520 | 0.266 | Moderate |
| APD | 0.488 | 0.398 | Moderate |
| MMC | 0.461 | 0.326 | Moderate |
| ECL | 0.451 | 0.352 | Moderate |
| AVY | 0.434 | 0.376 | Moderate |
| HON | 0.429 | 0.351 | Moderate |
| PPG | 0.429 | 0.335 | Moderate |
| SHW | 0.427 | 0.319 | Moderate |
| ITW | 0.427 | 0.310 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare LIN to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.