IYM(IYM)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe IYM ETF presents a portfolio heavily concentrated within the Basic Materials sector, which accounts for over 62% of total assets. This distinct tilt is driven by significant weightings in mining and commodity producers, with Freeport-McMoRan representing nearly one-fifth of the fund's value alone. When combined with Newmont Corporation, Fresnillo PLC, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Nucor Corp, Anglo American Platinum Ltd, Steel Dynamics Inc., and Albemarle Group Holdings, more than 90% of the top ten holdings reside exclusively in this single sector. Such a narrow focus creates an investment vehicle that functions largely as a proxy for global metal prices rather than offering broad industrial diversification, despite the presence of minor Industrials exposure from companies like Fastenal Company comprising less than 4% of the portfolio.
Geographically and thematically, the fund's performance will be inextricably linked to supply chain dynamics affecting copper, gold, silver, aluminum, and specialty chemicals. The dominance of mining giants suggests that macroeconomic factors influencing commodity cycles, including inflation hedging demands or industrial demand shifts for green energy infrastructure, will disproportionately impact the fund compared to a diversified equity basket. With an asset under management exceeding one billion dollars, the ETF maintains sufficient liquidity while retaining its specialized mandate. Investors seeking exposure specifically to the cyclical nature of raw material extraction and processing may find this concentration appropriate, whereas those preferring sector neutrality or balanced industrial coverage would observe limited representation outside the primary thematic focus in this structure.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 03:29:51.536394+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 92/100The investment theme implied by the ticker IYM is a pure-play exposure to gold miners, yet the underlying portfolio reveals a significant thematic divergence. While the fund holds several names often associated with precious metals like Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan, these constitute only a fraction of the total assets under management alongside major industrial producers such as Linde and Ecolab. The dominance of Basic Materials companies that operate primarily in chemicals, fertilizers, or steel rather than gold extraction suggests the fund relies heavily on broad sector names to maintain stability rather than adhering strictly to a bullion-focused mandate. This structural composition indicates that while some holdings align with traditional mining expectations, the majority of capital is deployed across the wider materials complex, diluting the specific thematic purity one might anticipate from a dedicated precious metals vehicle.
Sector concentration presents both cohesion and risk within this framework. With Basic Materials comprising over 62% of the portfolio and Industrials making up less than 4%, the allocation remains tightly clustered around a single broad industry group rather than diversifying across energy, technology, or consumer sectors often seen in thematic funds. However, the top ten holdings account for approximately two-thirds of total assets, creating a high concentration risk where performance is heavily dependent on the fortunes of a few large-cap entities like Linde and Newmont. This lack of differentiation from a standard materials index means the fund does not offer unique exposure to specific mining sub-sectors or geographic regions typically sought by investors targeting gold miners specifically. The sector weights are internally consistent but fail to distinguish the portfolio from general market benchmarks, suggesting the vehicle serves as a concentrated materials proxy rather than a specialized thematic play on precious metals.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 22:49:58.313258+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of IYM presents a highly concentrated exposure to the Basic Materials industry, which accounts for 62.1% of total assets within just nine holdings. This overwhelming focus suggests an investment thesis centered squarely on commodities and resource extraction rather than a diversified approach across multiple economic sectors. The remaining Industrials allocation represents a negligible fraction at 3.9%, indicating that the fund does not aim to capture broad industrial growth but instead isolates specific drivers within the materials space, such as mining and chemical production.
This structural design creates significant concentration risk, evidenced by the top ten holdings comprising 66.0% of the portfolio's value. The dominance of individual positions like LIN at nearly 20%, followed closely by NEM and FCX, implies that the fund's performance will be disproportionately sensitive to price fluctuations in specific commodities or corporate developments within these single entities. Such a tight clustering means that adverse events affecting even one major holding could materially impact the overall portfolio trajectory more severely than in a broadly diversified vehicle.
Furthermore, the composition reveals a distinct tilt toward large-cap leaders with established market positions rather than small-cap growth or value factors derived from sector breadth. The heavy weighting of companies like ECL and APD alongside pure-play miners indicates an emphasis on firms capable of navigating cyclical commodity markets through scale. Consequently, while this allocation offers targeted exposure to the resource complex, it lacks the diversification buffers typically found in balanced equity strategies, leaving returns highly correlated with the specific performance dynamics of the materials sector and its largest constituents.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 00:17:07.863195+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share IYM's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of IYM's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VONEVONE | $10B | — | 10 | 66.0% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 10 | 66.0% |
| VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares | $2.1T | 0.03% | 9 | 62.5% |
| SPLGSPLG | $97B | — | 9 | 62.5% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 9 | 62.5% |
66% of IYM's portfolio by weight is also held by VONE, which commands 8× more assets under management. When VONE receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IYM's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIYM's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 96% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 66% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside IYM collectively pay out 52% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 57% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryIYM is up 38.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +22.4%. The remaining +15.8% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 66% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of IYM's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of IYM's analyzed weight, 66% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 34% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 66% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
HIGHLIN at 19.9% contributes an estimated 58% of portfolio variance.IYM holds 10 stocks but behaves like an 15-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
IYM has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.8% of the market capitalization of IYM's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 20 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LIN | Linde PLC Basic Materials | 19.89% | 33.0x | 5/9 |
| 2 | NEM | Newmont Corp Basic Materials | 10.51% | 14.2x | 9/9 |
| 3 | FCX | Freeport-McMoRan Inc Basic Materials | 7.25% | 34.8x | 6/9 |
| 4 | ECL | Ecolab Inc Basic Materials | 5.80% | 34.6x | 5/9 |
| 5 | APD | Air Products and Chemicals Inc Basic Materials | 4.75% | 29.3x | 3/9 |
| 6 | NUE | Nucor Corp Basic Materials | 4.43% | 24.8x | 5/9 |
| 7 | FAST | Fastenal Co Industrials | 3.88% | 39.1x | 7/9 |
| 8 | AU | Anglogold Ashanti PLC Basic Materials | 3.55% | 14.2x | 8/9 |
| 9 | STLD | Steel Dynamics Inc Basic Materials | 3.38% | 27.9x | 4/9 |
| 10 | ALB | Albemarle Corp Basic Materials | 2.57% | — | 5/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how IYM’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
10 holdings · 66.0% tracked weight2026-05-23
10 holdings · 66.0% tracked weight2026-05-22
10 holdings · 66.0% tracked weight2026-05-21
10 holdings · 66.0% tracked weight2026-05-20
10 holdings · 66.0% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove IYM Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedAt $181.64, the current trading price of IYM sits within a defined technical context that invites analysis regarding its proximity to moving average envelopes. While specific envelope boundaries are not explicitly detailed in the provided data, this price point represents a snapshot relative to historical trend lines where mean-reversion strategies often look for deviations from the mean. If this level is significantly detached from long-term averages, it may suggest potential volatility as prices gravitate back toward central tendency; conversely, if it aligns closely with recent moving average clusters, it could indicate sustained momentum rather than an imminent reversal. The positioning of price relative to these statistical bands serves primarily as a gauge for market sentiment extremes. A substantial gap between the current quote and upper or lower envelope limits typically precedes corrective movements in technical theory, whereas tight adherence suggests ongoing trend integrity. Observers might note that without additional data on volume spikes or broader index correlation, isolating pure mean-reversion probability at this specific juncture requires caution. The $181.64 figure alone does not confirm a breakout or breakdown but rather establishes the baseline from which relative strength or weakness against established averages can be inferred by comparing it to prior price distributions. Ultimately, the technical setup highlights the importance of context when evaluating whether current valuations are stretched or compressed compared to recent norms. Traders monitoring this instrument would likely focus on how quickly prices react if they test key support and resistance levels implied by these moving average structures. The absence
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How IYM’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.