NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicNRG trades at 147.3x earnings — a 504% premium to its sector average of 24.4x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of NRG presents a distinct contradiction between its aggressive leverage and diminishing returns on invested capital. While the DuPont decomposition reveals an exceptionally high ROE of 51.4%, this metric is driven almost entirely by an equity multiplier of 17.33x rather than operational excellence, evidenced by thin net margins of just 2.8%. This structural reliance on leverage results in a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -2.6%, indicating that the company currently destroys value relative to its cost of capital despite generating revenue growth of 9.2% year-over-year. Although fundamental quality scores appear mixed, with a moderate Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 2.3 suggesting marginal safety, the deeply negative Beneish M-Score of -2.47 signals strong earnings quality without manipulation risks; however, the weak profitability factor (RMW) loading of -0.330 underscores persistent operational inefficiencies that constrain long-term compounding potential.
Valuation metrics reflect a market willing to price in hyper-growth expectations that may not align with current fundamental realities. The stock trades at a premium P/E ratio of 38.0x, significantly elevated relative to historical norms and sector peers, which appears justified only if the implied forward free cash flow growth rate of 19.5% materializes over the next decade. This aggressive pricing assumes that management can successfully transition from its current low-margin model to one capable of sustaining double-digit FCF expansion; any deviation in execution would likely trigger a rapid re-rating given the limited margin for error inherent in such high multiples. The substantial growth tilt (HML factor loading of -0.132) confirms that investors are currently compensating primarily for anticipated future earnings acceleration rather than current asset productivity or stability.
Risk-adjusted performance data highlights significant divergence between short-term momentum and long-term risk factors. Despite an impressive annual Fama-French alpha of 43.36%, which suggests superior stock selection relative to the market, this outperformance is heavily concentrated in growth characteristics that often correlate with higher volatility and valuation sensitivity. The most critical signal emerges from insider activity over the last ninety days, where net selling totaling approximately $5.3 billion indicates a pronounced lack of confidence among corporate insiders at these price levels. This massive distribution stands in stark contrast to the bullish valuation narrative, suggesting that while the stock may offer asymmetric upside if growth targets are met, it carries substantial downside risk should fundamentals fail to keep pace with expectations or if insider sentiment proves prescient regarding future earnings deterioration.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 120% above its 5-year average P/E of 18.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | $0.4750 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | $0.4750 | +8.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-01 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-01 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-03 | $0.4400 | +7.8% |
| 2024-11-01 | $0.4080 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-01 | $0.4080 | 0.0% |
| 2024-04-30 | $0.4080 | 0.0% |
| 2024-01-31 | $0.4080 | +7.9% |
| 2023-10-31 | $0.3780 | 0.0% |
| 2023-07-31 | $0.3780 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLU or VPU, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NRG shares regardless of NRG Energy, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $5.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to NRG through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NRG Energy, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NEXTERA ENERGY INC (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NRG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NRG Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 NRG shares, reducing daily market volatility.
NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.1% of the State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and 2.0% of the VPU (VPU). Across 27 tracked ETFs, approximately 35M shares (16.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest NRG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NRG Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for NRG Energy, Inc. over the past year sits near $150.44 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $133.51 sits 11.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
NRG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NRG Energy, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NRG Energy, Inc. converts 28% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 72% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | 200 | $159.81 | $31,962 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,453 | $167.73 | $411,441.69 |
| 2026-04-17 | 15,767 | $168.50 | $2.7M |
| 2026-04-16 | 207 | $168.45 | $34,869.15 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $170.96 | $512.88 |
| 2026-04-13 | 8,156 | $164.07 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-25 | 22 | $151.13 | $3,324.86 |
| 2026-03-20 | 100 | $161.40 | $16,140 |
| 2026-03-19 | 3,410 | $159.11 | $542,565.1 |
| 2026-03-03 | 22,628 | $175.58 | $4.0M |
| 2026-03-02 | 39 | $178.96 | $6,979.44 |
| 2026-02-23 | 53,969 | $179.18 | $9.7M |
| 2026-02-18 | 4,202 | $173.45 | $728,836.9 |
| 2026-02-17 | 79,132 | $172.35 | $13.6M |
| 2026-02-04 | 801 | $152.18 | $121,896.18 |
| 2026-02-03 | 2,501 | $149.11 | $372,924.11 |
| 2026-02-02 | 3,574 | $152.63 | $545,499.62 |
| 2026-01-15 | 96 | $149.83 | $14,383.68 |
| 2026-01-02 | 7 | $159.24 | $1,114.68 |
| 2025-12-30 | 36 | $160.96 | $5,794.56 |
| 2025-12-24 | 16,352 | $158.11 | $2.6M |
| 2025-12-19 | 11 | $154.64 | $1,701.04 |
| 2025-12-18 | 126,003 | $149.48 | $18.8M |
| 2025-12-17 | 64 | $160.15 | $10,249.6 |
| 2025-12-01 | 100 | $169.49 | $16,949 |
| 2025-11-20 | 159 | $168.80 | $26,839.2 |
| 2025-11-13 | 1 | $168.84 | $168.84 |
| 2025-11-06 | 16 | $173.19 | $2,771.04 |
| 2025-11-03 | 546 | $171.86 | $93,835.56 |
| 2025-10-24 | 4 | $163.81 | $655.24 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| VST | 0.730 | 0.785 | High co-movement |
| CEG | 0.634 | 0.734 | Moderate |
| PWR | 0.521 | 0.662 | Moderate |
| EME | 0.509 | 0.595 | Moderate |
| ETN | 0.491 | 0.558 | Moderate |
| LRCX | 0.491 | 0.600 | Moderate |
| FIX | 0.491 | 0.657 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.490 | 0.606 | Moderate |
| VRT | 0.482 | 0.526 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare NRG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.