Real Estate / REIT - Office

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG)

$45.14
+0.89%
$3.5B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
1.60
Beta
5.90%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.4 DistressBeneish M -2.30 CleanROIC−WACC -7.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of SL Green Realty Corp. present a stark divergence between top-line expansion and bottom-line erosion, as evidenced by revenue growth of 8.4% occurring alongside a net margin contraction to -9.4%. This profitability collapse is mathematically decomposed in the DuPont analysis: while asset turnover remains low at 0.08x and leverage sits at 2.55x, the primary driver of the negative return on equity (-2.0%) is the severe operating inefficiency reflected in the net margin. Compounding this operational distress is a critically weak capital allocation profile; with an ROIC of merely 1.2% against a WACC of 8.9%, the company generates returns that fall significantly short of its cost of capital, resulting in a negative spread of -7.6%. This value-destructive trajectory is corroborated by risk metrics: an Altman Z-Score of 0.4 signals extreme proximity to insolvency thresholds, and a Fama-French alpha of -69.37% indicates substantial underperformance relative to standard market factors over the annualized period.

Valuation multiples appear detached from these deteriorating fundamentals when compared against sector norms. While the stock trades at a P/E multiple that is difficult to contextualize given negative earnings, it sits in contrast to a reported sector average of 89.5x, suggesting either a severe discount due to distress or an anomaly where price-to-book metrics would be more relevant than price-to-earnings for this specific asset class. The market pricing currently reflects these structural headwinds rather than growth potential; the negative Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests weakening financial health, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.30 indicates no signs of earnings manipulation masking poor performance. Consequently, the current valuation does not appear to incorporate a recovery scenario but rather prices in persistent operational challenges and capital destruction inherent to the real estate sector's cyclical pressures.

From an asset pricing perspective, the security exhibits distinct factor characteristics that further complicate its risk-reward profile. The stock displays a positive Value Factor (HML) of 0.518, aligning it with value-oriented portfolios, yet this is counterbalanced by a robust Profitability Factor score (RMW) of only 0.391, which typically rewards high-margin businesses—ironically, SLG's margins are deeply negative. The absence of insider flow over the last 90 days remains neutral, offering no clear signal of management conviction amidst these headwinds. Collectively, the data paints a picture of an asset trapped in a cycle where revenue growth fails to translate into capital accretion, leaving investors exposed to significant downside risk without the safety net of strong profitability or efficient capital deployment.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

SLG is trading below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a downtrend in the short to medium term, while the RSI at 41.3 suggests it's approaching oversold territory but hasn't quite reached it yet.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.30
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

44.1%
Gross Margin
-9.4%
Net Margin
1.2%
ROIC
8.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -7.6%— Negative spread.
+8.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-388.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-9.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.08x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.55x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-2.0%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.55x
Debt / Equity
1.83x
Current Ratio
0.6x
Interest Coverage
7.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
418.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.38
Act: $-0.39
-0.7%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.75
-1334.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.00
Act: $0.50
+160487.1%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.61
Act: $-1.36
-124.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.6180
Latest Dividend
$2.84
2025 Total
-5.7%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.20
2022
$3.23
2023
$3.01
2024
$2.84
2025
$0.62
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-31$0.6180+139.5%
2025-11-28$0.25800.0%
2025-10-31$0.25800.0%
2025-09-30$0.25800.0%
2025-08-29$0.25800.0%
2025-07-31$0.25800.0%
2025-06-30$0.25800.0%
2025-05-30$0.25800.0%
2025-04-30$0.25800.0%
2025-03-31$0.25800.0%
2025-02-28$0.25800.0%
2025-01-31$0.25800.0%
Stock Splits
2022-01-24: 0.97:12021-01-21: 0.971:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

38.6%
Annual Volatility
-0.63
Sharpe (1Y)
-45.4%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.23
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.932
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.518
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.391
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.192
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -69.37%
R²: 44.0%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

-25.0
Forward P/E
1.30
PEG Ratio
0.97
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$66.91
52W High
$34.77
52W Low
32%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$204M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding SLG
0.12%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$173B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SLG shares regardless of SL Green Realty Corp.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $204M of passive capital is structurally linked to SLG through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SLG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in SL Green Realty Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SLG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SLGEpicenterVNQETFVBRETFVTWOETFVRTPXUnknownWELLLow RiskPLDMed RiskEQIXMed RiskAMTHigh Risk
SLG Price Drop (%)0

If SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SLG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SLG Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 14 SLG shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
SLG
Total Shares
71M
ETF Lock-Up
7.2%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
7.2%Locked Float

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.4% of the SLYV (SLYV) and 0.2% of the SPSM (SPSM). Across 6 tracked ETFs, approximately 5M shares (7.2% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SLG Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
SLG
PRICE
$45.14
FLOOR (POC)
$44.70
STRENGTH
Medium
$36$376%$398%$40$42$4310%$45POC 11%$45.14$46$48$49$51$52$54$55$57$58$606%$61$63$65
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for SL Green Realty Corp. over the past year sits near $44.70 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $45.14 trades 1.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1331,272$43.65$1.4M
2026-05-12269$44.22$11,895.18
2026-05-1192,686$45.75$4.2M
2026-05-0817$45.28$769.76
2026-05-07612$44.71$27,362.52
2026-05-064,643$43.74$203,084.82
2026-05-0426$42.85$1,114.1
2026-05-019,543$42.41$404,718.63
2026-04-301,502$42.41$63,699.82
2026-04-274,869$42.16$205,277.04
2026-04-24337$42.06$14,174.22
2026-04-2343,485$43.03$1.9M
2026-04-204,841$43.28$209,518.48
2026-04-1713$40.81$530.53
2026-04-1655,222$41.63$2.3M
2026-04-157$40.66$284.62
2026-04-134,676$38.42$179,651.92
2026-04-0917$38.61$656.37
2026-04-08500$37.56$18,780
2026-04-0629$36.06$1,045.74
2026-03-31280$35.88$10,046.4
2026-03-30492$35.33$17,382.36
2026-03-23177$37.48$6,633.96
2026-03-1920,748$38.37$796,100.76
2026-03-1124,312$38.57$937,713.84
2026-03-10217$39.14$8,493.38
2026-03-052,298$40.97$94,149.06
2026-03-049$39.05$351.45
2026-03-03123,418$37.59$4.6M
2026-03-022,278$36.85$83,944.3

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
VNO0.8220.794High co-movement
BXP0.7770.713High co-movement
VRTPX0.5900.483Moderate
JLL0.5240.497Moderate
HST0.5230.506Moderate
FRT0.5170.404Moderate
ONB0.5080.494Moderate
CBRE0.5080.483Moderate
UMBF0.5000.522Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare SLG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.