Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 14.4x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — STZ is in the lower valuation range.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of this Consumer Defensive name reveal a significant divergence between top-line pricing power and bottom-line capital efficiency. While the company maintains robust gross margins at 52.1%, indicating strong brand moats, it is currently operating with a negative net margin of -0.8% driven by elevated costs or restructuring charges. This operational pressure has resulted in a deteriorating DuPont ROE decomposition, where low asset turnover (0.47x) and high leverage (3.03x multiplier) cannot offset the margin compression to yield a negative return on equity of 1.1%. Capital allocation quality is further questioned by an ROIC that stands at just 1.5%, falling sharply below the cost of capital's 6.6% hurdle, creating a value-destroying spread of -5.1%. These fundamentals are corroborated by weak financial health signals: a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests limited operational resilience, while an Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places the firm in the "grey zone" for potential distress, despite a clean Beneish M-Score of -3.37 that rules out earnings manipulation.
Valuation metrics present a complex picture where current multiples appear compressed relative to historical norms and peers, yet intrinsic value models suggest substantial upside contingent on mean reversion. The stock trades at 23.7x forward earnings, significantly under the sector average of 34.4x, implying the market has priced in persistent execution risks rather than a temporary setback. A DCF analysis places fair value at $259, suggesting potential appreciation of approximately 72.7% if free cash flow growth stabilizes from its current negative trajectory of -0.6% over the next decade. However, this valuation gap relies on the assumption that current margin headwinds are transitory; any persistence in these dynamics would invalidate the high implied multiple expansion required to reach fair value.
Risk-adjusted performance data highlights a notable disconnect between risk factors and recent pricing. The stock exhibits a negative Fama-French alpha of -23.76% annually, indicating underperformance relative to its factor exposures over time. While it displays characteristics of a growth tilt with a Value Factor (HML) score of -0.130, the Profitability Factor (RMW) remains positive at 0.103, reflecting underlying robust profitability metrics that may not yet be fully reflected in share prices. Recent insider activity shows $85,345 net selling over the last 90 days, which typically signals caution from management regarding near-term visibility or capital needs, adding a layer of sentiment risk to the fundamental turnaround narrative.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe stock is trading below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a recent decline in price. The RSI at 40.3 suggests that the near-term momentum may be weakening but still within neutral territory, not yet signaling an oversold condition.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | $1.0300 | +1.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | $1.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-30 | $1.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-30 | $1.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-04-29 | $1.0200 | +1.0% |
| 2025-02-07 | $1.0100 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-05 | $1.0100 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-14 | $1.0100 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-02 | $1.0100 | +13.5% |
| 2024-02-07 | $0.8900 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-02 | $0.8900 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-09 | $0.8900 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MOAT or XLP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell STZ shares regardless of Constellation Brands, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to STZ through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Constellation Brands, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with STZ. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
STZ Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 STZ shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.3% of the MOAT (MOAT) and 1.4% of the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 25M shares (14.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest STZ Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
STZ Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Constellation Brands, Inc. over the past year sits near $139.20 (8% of 252-day volume). The current price of $136.76 sits 1.8% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 765 | $140.52 | $107,497.8 |
| 2026-05-12 | 63 | $142.41 | $8,971.83 |
| 2026-05-04 | 3,681 | $152.82 | $562,530.42 |
| 2026-05-01 | 47,173 | $156.58 | $7.4M |
| 2026-04-24 | 949 | $159.31 | $151,185.19 |
| 2026-04-20 | 200 | $162.28 | $32,456 |
| 2026-04-17 | 208 | $164.25 | $34,164 |
| 2026-04-16 | 137 | $163.95 | $22,461.15 |
| 2026-04-15 | 1,471 | $164.50 | $241,979.5 |
| 2026-04-13 | 4,394 | $166.15 | $730,063.1 |
| 2026-04-10 | 97 | $163.07 | $15,817.79 |
| 2026-04-07 | 285 | $155.25 | $44,246.25 |
| 2026-04-02 | 781 | $151.09 | $118,001.29 |
| 2026-04-01 | 2,741 | $150.00 | $411,150 |
| 2026-03-26 | 72 | $151.56 | $10,912.32 |
| 2026-03-25 | 14 | $152.68 | $2,137.52 |
| 2026-03-24 | 16,416 | $152.46 | $2.5M |
| 2026-03-20 | 328 | $151.91 | $49,826.48 |
| 2026-03-12 | 19,447 | $149.96 | $2.9M |
| 2026-03-09 | 27,262 | $146.47 | $4.0M |
| 2026-03-02 | 2 | $157.86 | $315.72 |
| 2026-02-25 | 2,509 | $160.07 | $401,615.63 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,100 | $156.41 | $172,051 |
| 2026-02-20 | 931 | $154.64 | $143,969.84 |
| 2026-02-19 | 158 | $156.29 | $24,693.82 |
| 2026-02-09 | 950 | $164.33 | $156,113.5 |
| 2026-02-04 | 408 | $160.62 | $65,532.96 |
| 2026-01-29 | 100 | $157.74 | $15,774 |
| 2026-01-28 | 1,474 | $161.25 | $237,682.5 |
| 2026-01-22 | 119 | $163.38 | $19,442.22 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| BF.B | 0.583 | 0.539 | Moderate |
| TAP | 0.432 | 0.359 | Moderate |
| PEP | 0.406 | 0.372 | Moderate |
| NVR | 0.395 | 0.396 | Moderate |
| CSL | 0.395 | 0.358 | Moderate |
| KDP | 0.388 | 0.371 | Moderate |
| BLDR | 0.385 | 0.387 | Moderate |
| MKC | 0.371 | 0.318 | Moderate |
| VRTPX | 0.360 | 0.175 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare STZ to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.