Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.8. DCF fair value of $194 implies 334% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Molson Coors Beverage Company reveal a distressed operational profile characterized by a negative return on invested capital of -10.3%, which sits 16.8 percentage points below the weighted average cost of capital. This value destruction is amplified by a DuPont ROE decomposition showing net margins contracting to -19.2% despite robust gross margin expansion at 38.4%, indicating severe pressure on operating leverage and pricing power amidst declining revenue growth of 4.2%. Risk assessment metrics further highlight fragility, with an Altman Z-Score of 0.8 signaling elevated bankruptcy risk that outweighs the moderate Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, while a negative annualized Fama-French Alpha of -25.55% suggests underperformance relative to standard market factors over the measured period.
Despite these deteriorating fundamentals, valuation models present a stark divergence from current pricing mechanics. The stock trades at a significant discount compared to its sector average P/E of 34.2x, and discounted cash flow analysis implies an intrinsic value of $205, suggesting potential upside if future free cash flows align with the model's assumptions rather than the implied ten-year growth rate of -7.6%. However, this valuation gap must be weighed against the fact that profitability factors remain neutral to robust in isolation (RMW: 0.459), yet are currently overwhelmed by margin erosion and capital inefficiency. The market appears to have priced in a continuation of negative free cash flow generation rather than a structural turnaround, creating a scenario where theoretical value is disconnected from realized earnings power.
Insider activity over the last ninety days shows modest net buying totaling $98,239, which may indicate management confidence or opportunistic accumulation at depressed levels, though this signal is muted by the broader risk profile. The Beneish M-Score of -3.28 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation, lending credibility to the reported financial distress rather than accounting irregularities. Ultimately, the investment thesis hinges on whether the company can reverse its negative ROIC-WACC spread and stabilize margins before the high bankruptcy risk materializes into a liquidity event, as current factor tilts heavily against profitability despite attractive relative valuation multiples.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -4% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.7% | 8.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $187 | $155 | $103 |
| 3% | $246 | $194 | $120 |
| 4% | $364 | $262 | $143 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $38.91.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $194 (+334.3%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of TAP is trading below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, suggesting a technical posture that's currently bearish with reduced momentum as indicated by the RSI dipping into oversold territory. The stock’s movement also reflects a relatively low beta, indicating it might not be fully participating in broader market trends, which could offer some stability but limits potential gains during rallies.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | $0.4800 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | $0.4800 | +2.1% |
| 2025-12-05 | $0.4700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-05 | $0.4700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-06 | $0.4700 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-27 | $0.4700 | +6.8% |
| 2024-12-06 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-30 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-07 | $0.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-29 | $0.4400 | +7.3% |
| 2023-11-30 | $0.4100 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-31 | $0.4100 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SPYD or XLP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TAP shares regardless of Molson Coors Beverage Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to TAP through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Molson Coors Beverage Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TAP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 22 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TAP Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 TAP shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.0% of the SPYD (SPYD) and 0.5% of the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Across 22 tracked ETFs, approximately 24M shares (13.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest TAP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 22 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TAP Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Molson Coors Beverage Company over the past year sits near $45.30 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $38.91 sits 14.1% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 1 | $42.19 | $42.19 |
| 2026-04-24 | 2,257 | $42.87 | $96,757.59 |
| 2026-04-15 | 740 | $43.66 | $32,308.4 |
| 2026-04-10 | 270,003 | $44.68 | $12.1M |
| 2026-04-09 | 2,297 | $43.90 | $100,838.3 |
| 2026-04-08 | 23,073 | $45.05 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-06 | 10,817 | $44.04 | $476,380.68 |
| 2026-04-01 | 4,595 | $43.06 | $197,860.7 |
| 2026-03-31 | 732 | $42.92 | $31,417.44 |
| 2026-03-30 | 149 | $43.40 | $6,466.6 |
| 2026-03-26 | 3,756 | $41.27 | $155,010.12 |
| 2026-03-25 | 17 | $41.16 | $699.72 |
| 2026-03-09 | 35,053 | $46.64 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-04 | 6,242 | $48.06 | $299,990.52 |
| 2026-02-23 | 2,244 | $49.86 | $111,885.84 |
| 2026-02-18 | 37,079 | $50.90 | $1.9M |
| 2026-02-13 | 2,658 | $54.38 | $144,542.04 |
| 2026-02-12 | 496 | $53.27 | $26,421.92 |
| 2026-02-10 | 19,091 | $50.87 | $971,159.17 |
| 2026-02-04 | 1,145 | $49.32 | $56,471.4 |
| 2026-01-29 | 142 | $47.74 | $6,779.08 |
| 2026-01-23 | 58,672 | $49.76 | $2.9M |
| 2026-01-20 | 142,446 | $48.95 | $7.0M |
| 2026-01-16 | 475 | $50.64 | $24,054 |
| 2026-01-15 | 45 | $50.49 | $2,272.05 |
| 2026-01-14 | 17,845 | $49.20 | $877,974 |
| 2025-12-22 | 17,201 | $47.68 | $820,143.68 |
| 2025-12-18 | 2 | $48.06 | $96.12 |
| 2025-12-17 | 195 | $47.81 | $9,322.95 |
| 2025-12-15 | 11 | $47.60 | $523.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| BF.B | 0.538 | 0.541 | Moderate |
| CAG | 0.529 | 0.536 | Moderate |
| GIS | 0.513 | 0.518 | Moderate |
| CPB | 0.484 | 0.530 | Moderate |
| MKC | 0.472 | 0.500 | Moderate |
| PEP | 0.462 | 0.453 | Moderate |
| KHC | 0.459 | 0.485 | Moderate |
| STZ | 0.432 | 0.359 | Moderate |
| LEN | 0.425 | 0.387 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TAP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.