Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 15.5x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — TSCO is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.6. DCF fair value of $16 implies 65% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust capital efficiency and earnings power, evidenced by a 5.1% ROIC-WACC spread that indicates value creation above the cost of capital. This high return is driven primarily by significant financial leverage rather than operational expansion or pricing power; while net margins sit at a healthy 7.1%, asset turnover remains moderate at 1.42x, and equity utilization is aggressive with an equity multiplier of 4.24x pushing ROE to 42.5%. Fundamental integrity checks are mixed: the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests average financial strength without recent deterioration, while a high Altman Z-Score of 4.8 signals low bankruptcy risk despite the elevated leverage. However, earnings quality metrics warrant scrutiny given a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.42 and sluggish revenue growth of only 4.3% year-over-year, which constrains long-term scalability relative to its margin profile.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at 21.3x earnings significantly below the sector average of 42.1x implies the stock is priced for lower growth expectations or carries hidden risks not immediately apparent in standard multiples. This discount aligns with discounted cash flow analysis, which calculates a fair value $17 per share, representing a -63% downside from current levels based on an assumed 10-year free cash flow growth rate of 18.3%. The market appears to be pricing in substantial headwinds that contradict the company's robust profitability factor (RMW) score of 0.278, suggesting investors may be discounting future operational capabilities due to recent performance trends or macro concerns within the consumer cyclical sector.
Risk-adjusted returns have been negative over recent periods, highlighted by a Fama-French alpha of -12.38% annually and neutral exposure to value factors (HML: -0.085). This underperformance is compounded by insider activity showing $11,959,624 in net selling over the last 90 days, indicating potential skepticism from management or major shareholders regarding current valuations or future prospects. While the balance sheet remains secure with a strong Z-Score and the business generates consistent returns on invested capital, the combination of depressed valuation multiples relative to sector peers, negative alpha generation, and significant insider outflows suggests the market is currently pricing in substantial downside risk that has not yet been fully realized in earnings quality metrics like revenue growth.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 4% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.1% | 9.1% | 11.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $20 | $14 | $10 |
| 3% | $25 | $16 | $11 |
| 4% | $32 | $19 | $13 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $30.01.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $16 (-64.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 44% below its 5-year average P/E of 39.0x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedTSCO is trading below both its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, indicating a technical posture that's currently bearish with waning momentum given the RSI at 35.4 suggests it might be approaching oversold territory but hasn't quite reached it yet.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 | $0.2400 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | $0.2400 | +4.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | $0.2300 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-25 | $0.2300 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-28 | $0.2300 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-26 | $0.2300 | +4.5% |
| 2024-11-25 | $0.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-26 | $0.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-24 | $0.2200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-23 | $0.2200 | +6.8% |
| 2023-11-24 | $0.2060 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-25 | $0.2060 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TSCO shares regardless of Tractor Supply Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to TSCO through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Tractor Supply Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TSCO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 39 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TSCO Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 2 TSCO shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) exerts significant gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.9% of the XRT (XRT) and 0.4% of the VOT (VOT). Across 39 tracked ETFs, approximately 286M shares (54.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.
ETFs with Highest TSCO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 39 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TSCO Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Tractor Supply Company over the past year sits near $50.52 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $30.01 sits 40.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
TSCO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Tractor Supply Company convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Tractor Supply Company converts 38% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 62% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 40,654 | $32.68 | $1.3M |
| 2026-05-05 | 30,454 | $32.31 | $983,968.74 |
| 2026-04-30 | 55,200 | $34.77 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-29 | 9,160 | $35.59 | $326,004.4 |
| 2026-04-28 | 189,018 | $35.67 | $6.7M |
| 2026-04-21 | 3,000 | $44.81 | $134,430 |
| 2026-04-17 | 84,231 | $44.63 | $3.8M |
| 2026-04-15 | 6 | $45.02 | $270.12 |
| 2026-04-13 | 453 | $45.03 | $20,398.59 |
| 2026-04-10 | 293 | $45.64 | $13,372.52 |
| 2026-04-09 | 7,284 | $45.28 | $329,819.52 |
| 2026-04-08 | 62,036 | $43.64 | $2.7M |
| 2026-03-31 | 196 | $45.41 | $8,900.36 |
| 2026-03-25 | 5,107 | $45.49 | $232,317.43 |
| 2026-03-17 | 418,498 | $48.78 | $20.4M |
| 2026-03-13 | 14,733 | $48.10 | $708,657.3 |
| 2026-03-11 | 1,835 | $50.34 | $92,373.9 |
| 2026-03-09 | 153 | $50.16 | $7,674.48 |
| 2026-03-05 | 45,703 | $50.59 | $2.3M |
| 2026-02-24 | 71,866 | $53.89 | $3.9M |
| 2026-02-23 | 20,922 | $52.96 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-19 | 575 | $52.54 | $30,210.5 |
| 2026-02-11 | 492 | $54.05 | $26,592.6 |
| 2026-02-06 | 8,213 | $54.48 | $447,444.24 |
| 2026-02-02 | 279,062 | $50.88 | $14.2M |
| 2026-01-30 | 5,044 | $50.96 | $257,042.24 |
| 2026-01-27 | 95,463 | $55.56 | $5.3M |
| 2026-01-26 | 86 | $54.69 | $4,703.34 |
| 2026-01-23 | 47,449 | $53.40 | $2.5M |
| 2026-01-20 | 13,700 | $51.01 | $698,837 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| HD | 0.507 | 0.505 | Moderate |
| LOW | 0.490 | 0.505 | Moderate |
| GPC | 0.472 | 0.479 | Moderate |
| ORLY | 0.462 | 0.492 | Moderate |
| PHM | 0.458 | 0.458 | Moderate |
| NVR | 0.451 | 0.392 | Moderate |
| TMHC | 0.443 | 0.417 | Moderate |
| IFF | 0.436 | 0.509 | Moderate |
| DHI | 0.433 | 0.412 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TSCO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.