WMS (WMS)

$135.66
+0.01%
$10.7B
Market Cap
25.5
P/E Ratio
1.33
Beta
0.57%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 5.6 SafeBeneish M -2.54 CleanROIC−WACC +4.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 5.6. DCF fair value of $97 implies 36% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency and operational leverage of WMS present a mixed fundamental profile characterized by strong profitability metrics juxtaposed with stagnant top-line expansion. The company generates an ROIC-WACC spread of 4.0%, indicating that it creates value above its cost of capital, supported by robust margins where net returns sit at 15.5% and gross returns reach 37.7%. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals a disconnect between margin quality and growth velocity; while profitability is high, revenue growth has decelerated to merely 1.0% year-over-year, suggesting that current ROE drivers rely heavily on operational leverage rather than market share gains or pricing power. Creditworthiness appears stable with an Altman Z-Score of 5.6 and a low Beneish M-Score of -2.54 signaling minimal earnings manipulation risk, yet the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates moderate financial strength without recent significant improvements in leverage or asset turnover.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in growth expectations that appear misaligned with current cash flow generation capabilities relative to intrinsic value models. Trading at a multiple of 24.8x, which sits virtually flat against its five-year average of 24.9x, implies investor consensus expects continued stability rather than acceleration. This premium valuation contrasts sharply with the DCF-derived fair value estimate of $97, which reflects an implied ten-year free cash flow growth rate of only 21.2% and suggests a potential discount of approximately -35.9%. The divergence between the current multiple anchored in historical norms and the lower intrinsic value indicates that either future growth assumptions must significantly exceed recent performance or the market is compensating for risks not captured in the static DCF model, creating a scenario where price sensitivity to earnings revisions could be heightened if growth fails to materialize as anticipated.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$135.66
Fair Value
$99
Implied Upside
-27.1%
$99IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)22%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)12.3%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
21.2%annual FCF growth priced in at $135.66

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →10.3%12.3%14.3%
2%$116$89$72
3%$130$97$77
4%$148$108$83

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $135.66.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $97 (-35.9%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
5.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.54
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

37.7%
Gross Margin
15.5%
Net Margin
16.4%
ROIC
12.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +4.0%— Positive spread.
+1.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-11.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
368.5M
Free Cash Flow
14%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.26x
Debt / Equity
3.33x
Current Ratio
7.4x
Interest Coverage
0.9x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.01%
FCF Yield
864.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $1.10
Act: $1.03
-6.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.76
Act: $1.95
+10.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.64
Act: $1.98
+20.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.10
Act: $1.27
+15.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.2000
Latest Dividend
$0.70
2025 Total
+12.9%
YoY Growth
5 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.12
2016
$0.27
2017
$0.31
2018
$1.35
2019
$0.36
2020
$0.42
2021
$0.47
2022
$0.54
2023
$0.62
2024
$0.70
2025
$0.38
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-06-01$0.2000+11.1%
2026-03-02$0.18000.0%
2025-12-01$0.18000.0%
2025-08-29$0.18000.0%
2025-05-30$0.1800+12.5%
2025-02-28$0.16000.0%
2024-12-02$0.16000.0%
2024-08-30$0.16000.0%
2024-05-31$0.1600+14.3%
2024-02-29$0.14000.0%
2023-11-30$0.14000.0%
2023-08-31$0.14000.0%

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

41.8%
Annual Volatility
0.94
Sharpe (1Y)
0.67
Sharpe (3Y)
-45.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-50.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

19.0
Forward P/E
1.27
PEG Ratio
5.44
Price/Book
925739
Avg Volume
$179.31
52W High
$105.14
52W Low
41%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$755M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding WMS
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$509B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WMS shares regardless of WMS's individual fundamentals. We estimate $755M of passive capital is structurally linked to WMS through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on WMS's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in WMS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

WMS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
WMSEpicenterVBETFVIGETFVXFETFBLDLow RiskMODLow RiskSGIMed RiskFLEXMed RiskOCMed Risk
WMS Price Drop (%)0

If WMS (WMS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TOPBUILD CORP (BLD) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with WMS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

WMS Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 14 WMS shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
WMS
Total Shares
77M
ETF Lock-Up
7.2%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
7.2%Locked Float

WMS (WMS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.3% of the XHB (XHB) and 0.3% of the VBK (VBK). Across 16 tracked ETFs, approximately 6M shares (7.2% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

WMS Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
WMS
PRICE
$135.66
FLOOR (POC)
$140.09
STRENGTH
High
$107$110$1148%$1187%$122$125$129$133$13610%$135.66$140POC 16%$14413%$14812%$1519%$155$159$162$166$170$174$177
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for WMS over the past year sits near $140.09 (16% of 252-day volume). The current price of $135.66 sits 3.2% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (16% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

WMS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does WMS convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$369M
EBITDA
$865M
FCF Conversion
43%
Reinvestment Rate
57%
43% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
16.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
4.0%

WMS converts 43% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 57% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.0% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-3011,863$146.41$1.7M
2026-04-249,872$153.02$1.5M
2026-04-2015$153.37$2,300.55
2026-04-171,183$144.32$170,730.56
2026-04-16172$147.75$25,413
2026-04-14340$152.05$51,697
2026-04-0923$147.42$3,390.66
2026-04-02430$137.00$58,910
2026-04-01600$137.13$82,278
2026-03-3115,101$131.46$2.0M
2026-03-191,325$135.39$179,391.75
2026-03-181,233$139.85$172,435.05
2026-03-103,786$149.90$567,521.4
2026-03-0471$162.21$11,516.91
2026-03-034,843$168.33$815,222.19
2026-02-23294$170.61$50,159.34
2026-02-192,459$169.95$417,907.05
2026-02-09436$175.38$76,465.68
2026-02-0662$170.03$10,541.86
2026-01-0911$151.61$1,667.71
2026-01-0830$148.23$4,446.9
2025-12-22342$148.51$50,790.42
2025-12-1912$146.85$1,762.2
2025-12-1631$148.33$4,598.23
2025-12-15766$149.67$114,647.22
2025-12-0317,388$151.78$2.6M
2025-11-132,221$150.85$335,037.85
2025-11-122,221$147.85$328,374.85
2025-11-1050$148.02$7,401
2025-11-0729,571$146.58$4.3M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
IBP0.7260.627High co-movement
PH0.6790.683Moderate
CRH0.6450.575Moderate
BLD0.6200.613Moderate
NDSN0.6120.552Moderate
SWK0.6110.560Moderate
BLDR0.6040.563Moderate
MAS0.5860.576Moderate
TOL0.5800.650Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare WMS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.