Stock vs Stock Comparison

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

BMNR$16.90
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
BMNRACGL
5719.1%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
Valuation (P/E)6.9x
4.0%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
57.1Safety (Altman Z)1.3
84.1%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
0.01xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
-0.06%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.035
252-Day Correlation
-0.243
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricBMNRACGL
Market Cap$11.0B$31.2B
P/E Ratio6.9x
Forward P/E20.5x9.0x
P/B0.97x1.34x
Dividend Yield0.05%
Beta1.690.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBMNRACGL
DCF Fair Value$453.32
DCF Upside+366.9%
Piotroski F4/95/9
Altman Z57.151.31
Beneish M-0.52
FCF Yield-0.06%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x
ROIC4.0%5.1%
WACC7.7%
ROIC – WACC-2.6pp
Gross Margin5.1%
Net Margin5719.1%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY84.1%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio1%

BMNR Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BMNR found in:

ARKF2.31%
ARKK1.84%
ARKW1.74%
XSW0.65%
VXF0.12%
VBR0.11%
VGT0.00%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BMNR vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BMNR generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.0% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between BMNR and ACGL is 0.035, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

BMNR appears in 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BMNR or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares BMNR and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BMNR and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between BMNR and ACGL is 0.035. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.