Stock vs Stock Comparison

Clean Harbors, Inc. vs Arcosa, Inc.

ACA wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

CLH
ACA

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
CLHACA
6.5%Profitability (Net Margin)7.2%
38.9xValuation (P/E)28.3x
8.5%Efficiency (ROIC)6.2%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
3.7Safety (Altman Z)
2.4%Growth (Rev YoY)12.2%
1.78xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.89x
2.57%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCLHACA
Market Cap$15.1B$5.9B
P/E Ratio38.9x28.3x
Forward P/E30.2x22.4x
P/B5.45x2.23x
Dividend Yield0.17%
Beta0.950.96

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCLHACA
DCF Fair Value$188.48$99.96
DCF Upside
Piotroski F7/98/9
Altman Z3.70
Beneish M-2.78-2.48
FCF Yield2.57%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.7x2.3x
ROIC8.5%6.2%
WACC9.6%
ROIC – WACC-1.1pp
Gross Margin31.3%22.4%
Net Margin6.5%7.2%
Rev Growth YoY2.4%12.2%
Sharpe (1Y)
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio6%

CLH Price

Loading chart...

ACA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CLH found in:

VBK0.44%
MDYV0.42%
SPMD0.41%
MDY0.41%
MDYG0.41%
VIS0.22%
VB0.19%
VXF0.19%
ONEV0.17%
ONEO0.07%
VONV0.05%
SPTM0.02%
VONE0.02%

ACA found in:

SLYG0.45%
SPSM0.35%
SLYV0.25%
VTWO0.18%
VFMO0.15%
VBR0.14%
VGK0.12%
VYMI0.10%
VIS0.09%
SPDW0.08%
VB0.08%
VXF0.08%
VEA0.06%
VSGX0.06%
CWI0.05%
VEU0.05%
VXUS0.04%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CLH vs ACA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACA leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CLH generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.5% compared to ACA's 6.2%. This suggests CLH is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CLH appears in 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACA appears in 18 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CLH or ACA?

Our quantitative analysis compares CLH and ACA across nine fundamental dimensions. ACA wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CLH and ACA correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.