Basic Materials / Specialty Chemicals

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)

$73.24
-1.37%
$19.4B
Market Cap
23.5
P/E Ratio
0.94
Beta
2.10%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 1.3 DistressBeneish M -2.47 CleanROIC−WACC -10.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 23.5x earnings — a 36% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — IFF is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.3.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. currently reflect a distressed operational cycle, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -10.2% and negative net margins at -3.3%. This poor capital efficiency is mathematically decomposed via DuPont analysis into weak asset turnover of 0.43x dragging down returns despite moderate leverage; however, the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests underlying financial stability that contrasts sharply with the Altman Z-Score of 1.2, which flags potential distress risks. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.47 indicates low earnings manipulation risk and gross margins remain robust at 36.2%, revenue contraction of -5.2% year-over-year highlights a disconnect between top-line volume and profitability. The Fama-French alpha data further complicates this picture, showing negative performance relative to the market (-7.97%) and value factors (-0.355), yet offset by positive exposure to robust profitability characteristics (RMW: 0.453).

Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between historical norms and current pricing realities. The stock trades at a P/E multiple substantially below the sector average of 36.1x, suggesting market discounting is already priced in. However, this compression conflicts with an implied free cash flow growth trajectory of 27.2% over ten years, which would typically command a premium valuation rather than a deep value setup. This discrepancy implies that current pricing may be reacting disproportionately to near-term margin pressures and revenue declines while ignoring the long-term growth assumptions embedded in forward models. The market appears to be penalizing earnings volatility more heavily than fundamental quality metrics might justify given the strong profitability factor score.

Risk assessment reveals conflicting signals regarding future trajectory. While insider activity over the last 90 days shows $11,966,533 in net buying, potentially signaling confidence from those with superior information access, the negative Fama-French alpha and low Altman Z-Score introduce substantial downside risk if operational turnaround fails to materialize quickly. The combination of a high profitability factor score against a backdrop of shrinking revenues creates an asymmetric scenario where any stabilization in asset turnover could unlock significant value, whereas further margin erosion would exacerbate the already tight liquidity position indicated by the Altman metric.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

23.5x
IFF P/E
36.7x
Sector Avg
-36%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current trading environment for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. presents a complex risk profile where the $75.25 price point sits within a sector characterized by cyclical volatility inherent to basic materials. While specific drawdown metrics are not provided in this snapshot, the fundamental backdrop of the chemical and fragrance industry often subjects equity prices to sharp corrections when raw material costs fluctuate or demand slows globally. This suggests that any upward momentum observed near these levels may be fragile rather than structural, potentially susceptible to sudden reversion if macroeconomic headwinds intensify. Volatility in this segment frequently acts as a double-edged sword; it can amplify gains during periods of commodity price surges but also accelerates losses when supply chain disruptions occur or consumer spending tightens. The absence of clear trend confirmation data implies that the asset is currently navigating a transitional phase where technical support levels may be tested more aggressively than usual. Investors must weigh whether recent price stability represents a genuine consolidation following a downturn or merely a temporary pause before further downside pressure from sector-wide headwinds takes hold. Ultimately, the interplay between current valuation and underlying industry fundamentals indicates that risk dynamics remain elevated. Without corroborating data on volume profiles or longer-term moving averages, it remains uncertain if the price action reflects sustainable value realization or speculative positioning vulnerable to rapid unwinding. The market structure appears sensitive to external shocks typical of the basic materials sector, meaning that momentum signals derived solely from current pricing could misrepresent the true resilience of

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.3
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.47
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

36.2%
Gross Margin
-3.3%
Net Margin
-0.7%
ROIC
9.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -10.4%— Negative spread.
-5.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-237.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
254.0M
Free Cash Flow
161%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-3.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.43x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.80x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-2.5%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.80x
Debt / Equity
1.42x
Current Ratio
-0.8x
Interest Coverage
5.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.12%
FCF Yield
779.0M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$12M
Net Buying
2
Buy Transactions
0
Sale Transactions
2026-03-13FYRWALD J. ERIKBuy$995,204
2026-03-12FRIBOURG PAUL JSold 1/8 qtrsBuy$11M
2026-01-02MULLER ANDRES ROBERTOOther1,825 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.14
Act: $1.20
+5.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.12
Act: $1.15
+2.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.02
Act: $1.05
+3.3%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.83
Act: $0.80
-3.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.4000
Latest Dividend
$1.60
2025 Total
0.0%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.84
2016
$2.66
2017
$2.84
2018
$2.96
2019
$3.04
2020
$3.12
2021
$3.20
2022
$3.24
2023
$1.60
2024
$1.60
2025
$0.40
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-20$0.40000.0%
2025-12-19$0.40000.0%
2025-09-29$0.40000.0%
2025-06-20$0.40000.0%
2025-03-21$0.40000.0%
2024-12-20$0.40000.0%
2024-09-20$0.40000.0%
2024-06-21$0.40000.0%
2024-03-21$0.4000-50.6%
2023-12-27$0.81000.0%
2023-09-21$0.81000.0%
2023-06-22$0.81000.0%
Stock Splits
1994-01-20: 3:11974-12-17: 1.02:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

30.3%
Annual Volatility
-0.03
Sharpe (1Y)
-26.2%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.69
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.690
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
-0.355
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
+0.453
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+1.348
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -7.97%
R²: 40.2%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

15.8
Forward P/E
0.90
PEG Ratio
1.37
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$84.45
52W High
$59.14
52W Low
56%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.5B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding IFF
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.1T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLB or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IFF shares regardless of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to IFF through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

IFF Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
IFFEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFLINLow RiskLINLow RiskNEMLow RiskNEMLow RiskCRHLow Risk
IFF Price Drop (%)0

If International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IFF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

IFF Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 IFF shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
IFF
Total Shares
255M
ETF Lock-Up
15.3%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
15.3%Locked Float

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.4% of the State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and 1.1% of the VAW (VAW). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 39M shares (15.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

IFF Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
IFF
PRICE
$73.24
FLOOR (POC)
$64.56
STRENGTH
Medium
$59$61$628%$639%$65POC 12%$669%$67$68$70$71$72$748%$73.24$756%$76$77$79$80$81$83$84
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. over the past year sits near $64.56 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $73.24 trades 13.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

IFF Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$254M
EBITDA
$779M
FCF Conversion
33%
Reinvestment Rate
67%
33% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
-0.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-10.4%

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. converts 33% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 67% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-10.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-143,432$77.48$265,911.36
2026-05-139,508$78.47$746,092.76
2026-05-048,539$70.81$604,646.59
2026-04-3094$68.89$6,475.66
2026-04-153$72.59$217.77
2026-04-10102$73.13$7,459.26
2026-03-2525$67.90$1,697.5
2026-03-10555$73.16$40,603.8
2026-03-066,394$75.38$481,979.72
2026-03-03676$80.75$54,587
2026-03-021,967$82.23$161,746.41
2026-02-2770,274$80.94$5.7M
2026-02-2661,786$79.88$4.9M
2026-02-231,317$81.39$107,190.63
2026-02-20485$81.62$39,585.7
2026-02-189,395$82.74$777,342.3
2026-02-09806$74.82$60,304.92
2026-01-30109$69.60$7,586.4
2026-01-2686,342$73.23$6.3M
2026-01-2129,702$70.86$2.1M
2026-01-205,580$71.68$399,974.4
2026-01-1569,027$70.18$4.8M
2026-01-148,469$69.61$589,527.09
2026-01-072,727$68.87$187,808.49
2026-01-02182$67.39$12,264.98
2025-12-317,311$67.93$496,636.23
2025-12-23237$66.57$15,777.09
2025-12-11265$65.39$17,328.35
2025-12-10216$64.54$13,940.64
2025-12-01110$69.48$7,642.8

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
PPG0.6190.559Moderate
MAS0.5530.548Moderate
NDSN0.5370.493Moderate
VRTPX0.5360.445Moderate
AVY0.5350.484Moderate
SHW0.5280.501Moderate
BALL0.5270.475Moderate
DD0.5270.407Moderate
ITW0.5230.456Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare IFF to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.